It's a wonderful life: Signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay

Michael Gurven, Wesley Allen-Arave, Kim Hill, Ana Hurtado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

198 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intensive food sharing among foragers and horticulturists is commonly explained as a means of reducing the risk of daily shortfalls, ensuring adequate daily consumption for all group members who actively pool resources. Consistently high food producers who give more than they receive, however, gain the least risk-reduction benefit from this daily pooling because they are the least likely to go without food on any given day. Why then do some high producers consistently share food, and why do some average producers share proportionally more food than others? We propose that although these individuals may not receive the same amounts they give (i.e., strict Tit-for-Tat), one explanation for their generosity is that they receive additional food during hard times. These include brief episodes of sickness, disease, injury, or accidents - fairly common events in traditional societies that can render individuals incapable of producing food, thereby having long-term effects on morbidity and fecundity and ultimately on lifetime reproductive success. Data collected among the Ache, a group of South American forager-horticulturists, indicate that those who shared and produced more than average (signaling cooperative intent and/or ability to produce) were rewarded with more food from more people when injured or sick than those who shared and produced below average. These results, framed within the context of tradeoffs between short-term and long-term fitness, may provide insight into motivations behind costly expenditures for establishing and reinforcing status and reputation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-282
Number of pages20
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
Volume21
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Paraguay
horticulturists
food
Pain
Food
risk reduction
accidents
cooperatives
morbidity
long term effects
food industry
fecundity
producer
tit-for-tat
traditional society
Aptitude
Generosity
Risk Reduction Behavior
Health Expenditures
fitness

Keywords

  • Altruism
  • Food sharing
  • Generosity
  • Hunter-gatherers
  • Reputation
  • Status quest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Development

Cite this

It's a wonderful life : Signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay. / Gurven, Michael; Allen-Arave, Wesley; Hill, Kim; Hurtado, Ana.

In: Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 4, 07.2000, p. 263-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gurven, Michael ; Allen-Arave, Wesley ; Hill, Kim ; Hurtado, Ana. / It's a wonderful life : Signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay. In: Evolution and Human Behavior. 2000 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 263-282.
@article{622a4bfbf6b04725afdcacaf5c2b695e,
title = "It's a wonderful life: Signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay",
abstract = "Intensive food sharing among foragers and horticulturists is commonly explained as a means of reducing the risk of daily shortfalls, ensuring adequate daily consumption for all group members who actively pool resources. Consistently high food producers who give more than they receive, however, gain the least risk-reduction benefit from this daily pooling because they are the least likely to go without food on any given day. Why then do some high producers consistently share food, and why do some average producers share proportionally more food than others? We propose that although these individuals may not receive the same amounts they give (i.e., strict Tit-for-Tat), one explanation for their generosity is that they receive additional food during hard times. These include brief episodes of sickness, disease, injury, or accidents - fairly common events in traditional societies that can render individuals incapable of producing food, thereby having long-term effects on morbidity and fecundity and ultimately on lifetime reproductive success. Data collected among the Ache, a group of South American forager-horticulturists, indicate that those who shared and produced more than average (signaling cooperative intent and/or ability to produce) were rewarded with more food from more people when injured or sick than those who shared and produced below average. These results, framed within the context of tradeoffs between short-term and long-term fitness, may provide insight into motivations behind costly expenditures for establishing and reinforcing status and reputation.",
keywords = "Altruism, Food sharing, Generosity, Hunter-gatherers, Reputation, Status quest",
author = "Michael Gurven and Wesley Allen-Arave and Kim Hill and Ana Hurtado",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "263--282",
journal = "Evolution and Human Behavior",
issn = "1090-5138",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It's a wonderful life

T2 - Signaling generosity among the Ache of Paraguay

AU - Gurven, Michael

AU - Allen-Arave, Wesley

AU - Hill, Kim

AU - Hurtado, Ana

PY - 2000/7

Y1 - 2000/7

N2 - Intensive food sharing among foragers and horticulturists is commonly explained as a means of reducing the risk of daily shortfalls, ensuring adequate daily consumption for all group members who actively pool resources. Consistently high food producers who give more than they receive, however, gain the least risk-reduction benefit from this daily pooling because they are the least likely to go without food on any given day. Why then do some high producers consistently share food, and why do some average producers share proportionally more food than others? We propose that although these individuals may not receive the same amounts they give (i.e., strict Tit-for-Tat), one explanation for their generosity is that they receive additional food during hard times. These include brief episodes of sickness, disease, injury, or accidents - fairly common events in traditional societies that can render individuals incapable of producing food, thereby having long-term effects on morbidity and fecundity and ultimately on lifetime reproductive success. Data collected among the Ache, a group of South American forager-horticulturists, indicate that those who shared and produced more than average (signaling cooperative intent and/or ability to produce) were rewarded with more food from more people when injured or sick than those who shared and produced below average. These results, framed within the context of tradeoffs between short-term and long-term fitness, may provide insight into motivations behind costly expenditures for establishing and reinforcing status and reputation.

AB - Intensive food sharing among foragers and horticulturists is commonly explained as a means of reducing the risk of daily shortfalls, ensuring adequate daily consumption for all group members who actively pool resources. Consistently high food producers who give more than they receive, however, gain the least risk-reduction benefit from this daily pooling because they are the least likely to go without food on any given day. Why then do some high producers consistently share food, and why do some average producers share proportionally more food than others? We propose that although these individuals may not receive the same amounts they give (i.e., strict Tit-for-Tat), one explanation for their generosity is that they receive additional food during hard times. These include brief episodes of sickness, disease, injury, or accidents - fairly common events in traditional societies that can render individuals incapable of producing food, thereby having long-term effects on morbidity and fecundity and ultimately on lifetime reproductive success. Data collected among the Ache, a group of South American forager-horticulturists, indicate that those who shared and produced more than average (signaling cooperative intent and/or ability to produce) were rewarded with more food from more people when injured or sick than those who shared and produced below average. These results, framed within the context of tradeoffs between short-term and long-term fitness, may provide insight into motivations behind costly expenditures for establishing and reinforcing status and reputation.

KW - Altruism

KW - Food sharing

KW - Generosity

KW - Hunter-gatherers

KW - Reputation

KW - Status quest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034215531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034215531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034215531

VL - 21

SP - 263

EP - 282

JO - Evolution and Human Behavior

JF - Evolution and Human Behavior

SN - 1090-5138

IS - 4

ER -