Item response theory analysis of the modified roland-morris disability questionnaire in a population-based study

Thelma J. Mielenz, Timothy S. Carey, Michael Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional population-based survey. Objective. Shorten the modified 23-item Roland (mRoland) scale using item response theory (IRT) methods and describe where in the functional disability range each scale is the most precise. Summary of Background Data. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is recommended for a functional disability outcome measure in patients with low back pain (LBP). One commonly used version is the Roland. It is unknown where in the functional disability range the Roland measures. Methods. One candidate individual with LBP in randomly selected households was interviewed, identifying 694 adults with chronic LBP. To justify the use of a unidimensional 2-parameter logistic IRT model, we performed both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results. Exploratory factor analysis revealed one dominant eigenvalue. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicate that the 1-factor model fit well. IRT analysis revealed variability in the slopes, in the range from 1.07 to 3.10. The marginal reliability, an IRT-based analog to coefficient α, was 0.88. The mRoland produces reliable scores (i.e., with a standard error <0.3) from 1.4 standard deviations below the mean to roughly 0.2 above the mean. Conclusion. The mRoland measures one construct. The mRoland seems to be an excellent tool for measuring just-below-average levels of functional disability. The mRoland measures high levels of functional disability with relatively poor reliability and may be more appropriate for a less-disabled population with LBP. We demonstrate that the mRoland can be shortened to 11 items with minimal loss of information. We show that there are different ways to go about selecting the set of 11 items that yield short forms with different strengths.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E366-E371
JournalSpine
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Statistical Factor Analysis
Population
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • chronic low back pain
  • IRT
  • modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Item response theory analysis of the modified roland-morris disability questionnaire in a population-based study. / Mielenz, Thelma J.; Carey, Timothy S.; Edwards, Michael.

In: Spine, Vol. 40, No. 6, 15.03.2015, p. E366-E371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b65e80452f1e4602b6e4faf67de40429,
title = "Item response theory analysis of the modified roland-morris disability questionnaire in a population-based study",
abstract = "Study Design. This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional population-based survey. Objective. Shorten the modified 23-item Roland (mRoland) scale using item response theory (IRT) methods and describe where in the functional disability range each scale is the most precise. Summary of Background Data. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is recommended for a functional disability outcome measure in patients with low back pain (LBP). One commonly used version is the Roland. It is unknown where in the functional disability range the Roland measures. Methods. One candidate individual with LBP in randomly selected households was interviewed, identifying 694 adults with chronic LBP. To justify the use of a unidimensional 2-parameter logistic IRT model, we performed both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results. Exploratory factor analysis revealed one dominant eigenvalue. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicate that the 1-factor model fit well. IRT analysis revealed variability in the slopes, in the range from 1.07 to 3.10. The marginal reliability, an IRT-based analog to coefficient α, was 0.88. The mRoland produces reliable scores (i.e., with a standard error <0.3) from 1.4 standard deviations below the mean to roughly 0.2 above the mean. Conclusion. The mRoland measures one construct. The mRoland seems to be an excellent tool for measuring just-below-average levels of functional disability. The mRoland measures high levels of functional disability with relatively poor reliability and may be more appropriate for a less-disabled population with LBP. We demonstrate that the mRoland can be shortened to 11 items with minimal loss of information. We show that there are different ways to go about selecting the set of 11 items that yield short forms with different strengths.",
keywords = "chronic low back pain, IRT, modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire",
author = "Mielenz, {Thelma J.} and Carey, {Timothy S.} and Michael Edwards",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000000764",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "E366--E371",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Item response theory analysis of the modified roland-morris disability questionnaire in a population-based study

AU - Mielenz, Thelma J.

AU - Carey, Timothy S.

AU - Edwards, Michael

PY - 2015/3/15

Y1 - 2015/3/15

N2 - Study Design. This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional population-based survey. Objective. Shorten the modified 23-item Roland (mRoland) scale using item response theory (IRT) methods and describe where in the functional disability range each scale is the most precise. Summary of Background Data. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is recommended for a functional disability outcome measure in patients with low back pain (LBP). One commonly used version is the Roland. It is unknown where in the functional disability range the Roland measures. Methods. One candidate individual with LBP in randomly selected households was interviewed, identifying 694 adults with chronic LBP. To justify the use of a unidimensional 2-parameter logistic IRT model, we performed both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results. Exploratory factor analysis revealed one dominant eigenvalue. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicate that the 1-factor model fit well. IRT analysis revealed variability in the slopes, in the range from 1.07 to 3.10. The marginal reliability, an IRT-based analog to coefficient α, was 0.88. The mRoland produces reliable scores (i.e., with a standard error <0.3) from 1.4 standard deviations below the mean to roughly 0.2 above the mean. Conclusion. The mRoland measures one construct. The mRoland seems to be an excellent tool for measuring just-below-average levels of functional disability. The mRoland measures high levels of functional disability with relatively poor reliability and may be more appropriate for a less-disabled population with LBP. We demonstrate that the mRoland can be shortened to 11 items with minimal loss of information. We show that there are different ways to go about selecting the set of 11 items that yield short forms with different strengths.

AB - Study Design. This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional population-based survey. Objective. Shorten the modified 23-item Roland (mRoland) scale using item response theory (IRT) methods and describe where in the functional disability range each scale is the most precise. Summary of Background Data. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is recommended for a functional disability outcome measure in patients with low back pain (LBP). One commonly used version is the Roland. It is unknown where in the functional disability range the Roland measures. Methods. One candidate individual with LBP in randomly selected households was interviewed, identifying 694 adults with chronic LBP. To justify the use of a unidimensional 2-parameter logistic IRT model, we performed both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results. Exploratory factor analysis revealed one dominant eigenvalue. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicate that the 1-factor model fit well. IRT analysis revealed variability in the slopes, in the range from 1.07 to 3.10. The marginal reliability, an IRT-based analog to coefficient α, was 0.88. The mRoland produces reliable scores (i.e., with a standard error <0.3) from 1.4 standard deviations below the mean to roughly 0.2 above the mean. Conclusion. The mRoland measures one construct. The mRoland seems to be an excellent tool for measuring just-below-average levels of functional disability. The mRoland measures high levels of functional disability with relatively poor reliability and may be more appropriate for a less-disabled population with LBP. We demonstrate that the mRoland can be shortened to 11 items with minimal loss of information. We show that there are different ways to go about selecting the set of 11 items that yield short forms with different strengths.

KW - chronic low back pain

KW - IRT

KW - modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952916474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952916474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000764

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000764

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - E366-E371

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 6

ER -