Issues driving reform of faculty reward systems to advance professional graduate engineering education: Differentiating characteristics between scientific research and engineering

D. A. Keating, T. G. Stanford, J. M. Snellenberger, D. H. Quick, I. T. Davis, J. P. Tidwell, D. R. Depew, G. R. Bertoline, M. J. Dyrenfurth, Albert McHenry, D. D. Dunlap, S. J. Tricamo

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

This is the second paper in the special panel session focusing on issues driving reform of faculty reward systems to advance professional graduate engineering education for creative engineering practice and to stimulate leadership of technology innovation to enhance U.S. competitiveness. This paper addresses the characteristics that differentiate the pursuits of basic academic scientific research and of professional engineering practice for the systematic creation, development, and leadership of new and improved technology for purposeful innovation in industry and government service.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8527-8546
Number of pages20
JournalASEE Annual Conference Proceedings
StatePublished - Oct 26 2004
EventASEE 2004 Annual Conference and Exposition, "Engineering Researchs New Heights" - Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Duration: Jun 20 2004Jun 23 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Issues driving reform of faculty reward systems to advance professional graduate engineering education: Differentiating characteristics between scientific research and engineering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this