Is there a spirit of governance?

Jonathan Koppell, Jennifer Claire Auer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In his classic work, H. George Frederickson off ers a robust call to value anew the spirit of public administration. Th is was off ered not as an abstract treatise but as a reaction to the evolution of the practice of public administration that included institutions and approaches that stretched previous understanding of the fi eld. Much about the constitution of the "spirit of public administration" is left abstract by Frederickson. It is something of a placeholder for the norms, values, and principles that are threatened by the ascendance of "governance." In this article, the threat of an undermined spirit of administration in a governance era is considered with an attempt at greater specifi city and concreteness than previous discussions. To the end of opening a more empirical exploration of the spirit-governance nexus, this article moves away from an either/or position and attempts to distill the highest risks of deterioration of spirit in the provision of public goods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-33
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume72
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

public administration
governance
Values
constitution
threat
Governance
Public Administration
Threat
Deterioration
Constitution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Is there a spirit of governance? / Koppell, Jonathan; Auer, Jennifer Claire.

In: Public Administration Review, Vol. 72, No. SUPPL.1, 11.2012, p. 24-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koppell, Jonathan ; Auer, Jennifer Claire. / Is there a spirit of governance?. In: Public Administration Review. 2012 ; Vol. 72, No. SUPPL.1. pp. 24-33.
@article{74b12138957046d1a5bad75f2f7fb2a4,
title = "Is there a spirit of governance?",
abstract = "In his classic work, H. George Frederickson off ers a robust call to value anew the spirit of public administration. Th is was off ered not as an abstract treatise but as a reaction to the evolution of the practice of public administration that included institutions and approaches that stretched previous understanding of the fi eld. Much about the constitution of the {"}spirit of public administration{"} is left abstract by Frederickson. It is something of a placeholder for the norms, values, and principles that are threatened by the ascendance of {"}governance.{"} In this article, the threat of an undermined spirit of administration in a governance era is considered with an attempt at greater specifi city and concreteness than previous discussions. To the end of opening a more empirical exploration of the spirit-governance nexus, this article moves away from an either/or position and attempts to distill the highest risks of deterioration of spirit in the provision of public goods.",
author = "Jonathan Koppell and Auer, {Jennifer Claire}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02668.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "24--33",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there a spirit of governance?

AU - Koppell, Jonathan

AU - Auer, Jennifer Claire

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - In his classic work, H. George Frederickson off ers a robust call to value anew the spirit of public administration. Th is was off ered not as an abstract treatise but as a reaction to the evolution of the practice of public administration that included institutions and approaches that stretched previous understanding of the fi eld. Much about the constitution of the "spirit of public administration" is left abstract by Frederickson. It is something of a placeholder for the norms, values, and principles that are threatened by the ascendance of "governance." In this article, the threat of an undermined spirit of administration in a governance era is considered with an attempt at greater specifi city and concreteness than previous discussions. To the end of opening a more empirical exploration of the spirit-governance nexus, this article moves away from an either/or position and attempts to distill the highest risks of deterioration of spirit in the provision of public goods.

AB - In his classic work, H. George Frederickson off ers a robust call to value anew the spirit of public administration. Th is was off ered not as an abstract treatise but as a reaction to the evolution of the practice of public administration that included institutions and approaches that stretched previous understanding of the fi eld. Much about the constitution of the "spirit of public administration" is left abstract by Frederickson. It is something of a placeholder for the norms, values, and principles that are threatened by the ascendance of "governance." In this article, the threat of an undermined spirit of administration in a governance era is considered with an attempt at greater specifi city and concreteness than previous discussions. To the end of opening a more empirical exploration of the spirit-governance nexus, this article moves away from an either/or position and attempts to distill the highest risks of deterioration of spirit in the provision of public goods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873447923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873447923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02668.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02668.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873447923

VL - 72

SP - 24

EP - 33

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - SUPPL.1

ER -