Is Nothing Sacred? Religion, Sex, and Reproductive Strategies

Jordan W. Moon, Jaimie Arona Krems, Adam Cohen, Douglas Kenrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Religion has often been conceptualized as a collection of beliefs, practices, and proscriptions that lift people’s thoughts and behaviors out of the metaphorical gutter of sex and selfishness toward lives full of meaning, contemplation, and community service. But religious beliefs and behaviors may serve selfish, sexual motivations in ways that are not always obvious or consciously intended. We review two lines of research illustrating nonobvious links between the mundane and the religious. First, contrary to long-held assumptions that religious upbringing causes sexually restrictive attitudes and behaviors, several large data sets now suggest a reverse causal arrow—people’s preferred mating strategies determining their attraction toward, or repulsion from, religion. Second, other recent findings suggest that distrust of nonreligious individuals is almost completely erased by knowledge that they are following a restricted monogamous lifestyle. Thus, reproductive strategies often underlie apparently sacred concerns. We close with a consideration of ways in which reproductive interests might underlie a broad range of benefits associated with religious affiliation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Religion and Sex
Religion
Social Welfare
Life Style
Motivation
Research

Keywords

  • evolutionary psychology
  • mating
  • religion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Is Nothing Sacred? Religion, Sex, and Reproductive Strategies. / Moon, Jordan W.; Krems, Jaimie Arona; Cohen, Adam; Kenrick, Douglas.

In: Current Directions in Psychological Science, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9da9e9770cd436a9f6c621fb2f36d1c,
title = "Is Nothing Sacred? Religion, Sex, and Reproductive Strategies",
abstract = "Religion has often been conceptualized as a collection of beliefs, practices, and proscriptions that lift people’s thoughts and behaviors out of the metaphorical gutter of sex and selfishness toward lives full of meaning, contemplation, and community service. But religious beliefs and behaviors may serve selfish, sexual motivations in ways that are not always obvious or consciously intended. We review two lines of research illustrating nonobvious links between the mundane and the religious. First, contrary to long-held assumptions that religious upbringing causes sexually restrictive attitudes and behaviors, several large data sets now suggest a reverse causal arrow—people’s preferred mating strategies determining their attraction toward, or repulsion from, religion. Second, other recent findings suggest that distrust of nonreligious individuals is almost completely erased by knowledge that they are following a restricted monogamous lifestyle. Thus, reproductive strategies often underlie apparently sacred concerns. We close with a consideration of ways in which reproductive interests might underlie a broad range of benefits associated with religious affiliation.",
keywords = "evolutionary psychology, mating, religion",
author = "Moon, {Jordan W.} and Krems, {Jaimie Arona} and Adam Cohen and Douglas Kenrick",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0963721419838242",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Current Directions in Psychological Science",
issn = "0963-7214",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Nothing Sacred? Religion, Sex, and Reproductive Strategies

AU - Moon, Jordan W.

AU - Krems, Jaimie Arona

AU - Cohen, Adam

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Religion has often been conceptualized as a collection of beliefs, practices, and proscriptions that lift people’s thoughts and behaviors out of the metaphorical gutter of sex and selfishness toward lives full of meaning, contemplation, and community service. But religious beliefs and behaviors may serve selfish, sexual motivations in ways that are not always obvious or consciously intended. We review two lines of research illustrating nonobvious links between the mundane and the religious. First, contrary to long-held assumptions that religious upbringing causes sexually restrictive attitudes and behaviors, several large data sets now suggest a reverse causal arrow—people’s preferred mating strategies determining their attraction toward, or repulsion from, religion. Second, other recent findings suggest that distrust of nonreligious individuals is almost completely erased by knowledge that they are following a restricted monogamous lifestyle. Thus, reproductive strategies often underlie apparently sacred concerns. We close with a consideration of ways in which reproductive interests might underlie a broad range of benefits associated with religious affiliation.

AB - Religion has often been conceptualized as a collection of beliefs, practices, and proscriptions that lift people’s thoughts and behaviors out of the metaphorical gutter of sex and selfishness toward lives full of meaning, contemplation, and community service. But religious beliefs and behaviors may serve selfish, sexual motivations in ways that are not always obvious or consciously intended. We review two lines of research illustrating nonobvious links between the mundane and the religious. First, contrary to long-held assumptions that religious upbringing causes sexually restrictive attitudes and behaviors, several large data sets now suggest a reverse causal arrow—people’s preferred mating strategies determining their attraction toward, or repulsion from, religion. Second, other recent findings suggest that distrust of nonreligious individuals is almost completely erased by knowledge that they are following a restricted monogamous lifestyle. Thus, reproductive strategies often underlie apparently sacred concerns. We close with a consideration of ways in which reproductive interests might underlie a broad range of benefits associated with religious affiliation.

KW - evolutionary psychology

KW - mating

KW - religion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065195245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065195245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0963721419838242

DO - 10.1177/0963721419838242

M3 - Article

JO - Current Directions in Psychological Science

JF - Current Directions in Psychological Science

SN - 0963-7214

ER -