Is native anthropology really possible?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although native anthropologists are often understood to be quite different from non-native anthropologists, this paper argues that the distinction is not as clear as is often presumed. Both types of anthropologists are partial outsiders who are positioned at a relative distance from those they study in the field. This is illustrated with a discussion of the author's own fieldwork with Japanese Americans as a 'native anthropologist'. Ultimately, the cultural differences we experience with the 'natives' are productive for fieldwork and essential for anthropological knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-17
Number of pages4
JournalAnthropology Today
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is native anthropology really possible?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this