Is all space created equal? Uncovering the relationship between competing land uses in subdivisions

Joshua Abbott, H. Allen Klaiber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evaluating the importance of different forms of open space to households requires an evaluation of the service flows provided by each type of open space. For many non-market goods, these flows occur over multiple spatial scales and require analysis that simultaneously accounts for capitalization at each scale. To meet this often overlooked need, we apply a newly developed extension to the Hausman-Taylor model that treats multiple housing transactions occurring in a spatial location as a panel. This methodology allows us to account for omitted variables within a subdivision while instrumenting for variables identified through differences between subdivisions. We measure capitalization of open space at three distinct spatial extents: adjacency, walkability, and subdivision-wide. We find that the interactions between subdivision open space and private open space in the form of lot size change from complementarity at small scales to substitutability at large scales. These results confirm much of the intuition developed by ecologists and public planners on the likely service flows associated with open space and show how our approach to accounting for multiple spatial scales of capitalization in the evaluation of non-market goods could be beneficial to other areas of applied research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-307
Number of pages12
JournalEcological Economics
Volume70
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2010

Fingerprint

open space
land use
complementarity
Land use
Open space
methodology
Capitalization

Keywords

  • Capitalization
  • Endogeneity
  • Hausman-Taylor
  • Hedonic
  • Open space
  • Spatial scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Is all space created equal? Uncovering the relationship between competing land uses in subdivisions. / Abbott, Joshua; Klaiber, H. Allen.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 70, No. 2, 15.12.2010, p. 296-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78ec887e8e40441096b6a49cb38528c0,
title = "Is all space created equal? Uncovering the relationship between competing land uses in subdivisions",
abstract = "Evaluating the importance of different forms of open space to households requires an evaluation of the service flows provided by each type of open space. For many non-market goods, these flows occur over multiple spatial scales and require analysis that simultaneously accounts for capitalization at each scale. To meet this often overlooked need, we apply a newly developed extension to the Hausman-Taylor model that treats multiple housing transactions occurring in a spatial location as a panel. This methodology allows us to account for omitted variables within a subdivision while instrumenting for variables identified through differences between subdivisions. We measure capitalization of open space at three distinct spatial extents: adjacency, walkability, and subdivision-wide. We find that the interactions between subdivision open space and private open space in the form of lot size change from complementarity at small scales to substitutability at large scales. These results confirm much of the intuition developed by ecologists and public planners on the likely service flows associated with open space and show how our approach to accounting for multiple spatial scales of capitalization in the evaluation of non-market goods could be beneficial to other areas of applied research.",
keywords = "Capitalization, Endogeneity, Hausman-Taylor, Hedonic, Open space, Spatial scale",
author = "Joshua Abbott and Klaiber, {H. Allen}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "296--307",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is all space created equal? Uncovering the relationship between competing land uses in subdivisions

AU - Abbott, Joshua

AU - Klaiber, H. Allen

PY - 2010/12/15

Y1 - 2010/12/15

N2 - Evaluating the importance of different forms of open space to households requires an evaluation of the service flows provided by each type of open space. For many non-market goods, these flows occur over multiple spatial scales and require analysis that simultaneously accounts for capitalization at each scale. To meet this often overlooked need, we apply a newly developed extension to the Hausman-Taylor model that treats multiple housing transactions occurring in a spatial location as a panel. This methodology allows us to account for omitted variables within a subdivision while instrumenting for variables identified through differences between subdivisions. We measure capitalization of open space at three distinct spatial extents: adjacency, walkability, and subdivision-wide. We find that the interactions between subdivision open space and private open space in the form of lot size change from complementarity at small scales to substitutability at large scales. These results confirm much of the intuition developed by ecologists and public planners on the likely service flows associated with open space and show how our approach to accounting for multiple spatial scales of capitalization in the evaluation of non-market goods could be beneficial to other areas of applied research.

AB - Evaluating the importance of different forms of open space to households requires an evaluation of the service flows provided by each type of open space. For many non-market goods, these flows occur over multiple spatial scales and require analysis that simultaneously accounts for capitalization at each scale. To meet this often overlooked need, we apply a newly developed extension to the Hausman-Taylor model that treats multiple housing transactions occurring in a spatial location as a panel. This methodology allows us to account for omitted variables within a subdivision while instrumenting for variables identified through differences between subdivisions. We measure capitalization of open space at three distinct spatial extents: adjacency, walkability, and subdivision-wide. We find that the interactions between subdivision open space and private open space in the form of lot size change from complementarity at small scales to substitutability at large scales. These results confirm much of the intuition developed by ecologists and public planners on the likely service flows associated with open space and show how our approach to accounting for multiple spatial scales of capitalization in the evaluation of non-market goods could be beneficial to other areas of applied research.

KW - Capitalization

KW - Endogeneity

KW - Hausman-Taylor

KW - Hedonic

KW - Open space

KW - Spatial scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449237739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449237739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78449237739

VL - 70

SP - 296

EP - 307

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

IS - 2

ER -