Is Active Representation an Organizational-Level Process? The Indirect Effect of Bureaucrats on Clients They Don’t Directly Serve

Nathan Favero, Angel Luis Molina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A now well-established link exists between passive representation of racial and gender minorities in certain bureaucracies and substantive benefits for the represented groups. However, few quantitative studies have distinguished between the multiple possible mechanisms by which passive representation might produce such effects. We conduct a novel set of empirical analyses aimed at determining whether or not passive representation produces effects only for those clients who directly interact with bureaucrats who share their demographic characteristics or if passive representation produces broader organizational-level effects. We find strong evidence that minority clients’ outcomes are positively associated with representation in portions of the bureaucracy with which they do not directly interact. This suggests that either passive representation produces substantial bottom-up, organizational-level effects or that managers who recruit minority personnel also adopt policies that are favorable toward minority clients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-17
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

minority
bureaucracy
Indirect effects
Organizational level
Bureaucrats
Minorities
personnel
manager
gender
evidence
Level effect
Bureaucracy
Group
Managers
Bottom-up
Personnel
Demographic characteristics

Keywords

  • bureaucratic outcomes
  • education
  • public sector diversity
  • race
  • representative bureaucracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{b54ffd5cd78242eba4286cbeb34c98f3,
title = "Is Active Representation an Organizational-Level Process? The Indirect Effect of Bureaucrats on Clients They Don’t Directly Serve",
abstract = "A now well-established link exists between passive representation of racial and gender minorities in certain bureaucracies and substantive benefits for the represented groups. However, few quantitative studies have distinguished between the multiple possible mechanisms by which passive representation might produce such effects. We conduct a novel set of empirical analyses aimed at determining whether or not passive representation produces effects only for those clients who directly interact with bureaucrats who share their demographic characteristics or if passive representation produces broader organizational-level effects. We find strong evidence that minority clients’ outcomes are positively associated with representation in portions of the bureaucracy with which they do not directly interact. This suggests that either passive representation produces substantial bottom-up, organizational-level effects or that managers who recruit minority personnel also adopt policies that are favorable toward minority clients.",
keywords = "bureaucratic outcomes, education, public sector diversity, race, representative bureaucracy",
author = "Nathan Favero and Molina, {Angel Luis}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0275074016660614",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "3--17",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Active Representation an Organizational-Level Process? The Indirect Effect of Bureaucrats on Clients They Don’t Directly Serve

AU - Favero, Nathan

AU - Molina, Angel Luis

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - A now well-established link exists between passive representation of racial and gender minorities in certain bureaucracies and substantive benefits for the represented groups. However, few quantitative studies have distinguished between the multiple possible mechanisms by which passive representation might produce such effects. We conduct a novel set of empirical analyses aimed at determining whether or not passive representation produces effects only for those clients who directly interact with bureaucrats who share their demographic characteristics or if passive representation produces broader organizational-level effects. We find strong evidence that minority clients’ outcomes are positively associated with representation in portions of the bureaucracy with which they do not directly interact. This suggests that either passive representation produces substantial bottom-up, organizational-level effects or that managers who recruit minority personnel also adopt policies that are favorable toward minority clients.

AB - A now well-established link exists between passive representation of racial and gender minorities in certain bureaucracies and substantive benefits for the represented groups. However, few quantitative studies have distinguished between the multiple possible mechanisms by which passive representation might produce such effects. We conduct a novel set of empirical analyses aimed at determining whether or not passive representation produces effects only for those clients who directly interact with bureaucrats who share their demographic characteristics or if passive representation produces broader organizational-level effects. We find strong evidence that minority clients’ outcomes are positively associated with representation in portions of the bureaucracy with which they do not directly interact. This suggests that either passive representation produces substantial bottom-up, organizational-level effects or that managers who recruit minority personnel also adopt policies that are favorable toward minority clients.

KW - bureaucratic outcomes

KW - education

KW - public sector diversity

KW - race

KW - representative bureaucracy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037057884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037057884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074016660614

DO - 10.1177/0275074016660614

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85037057884

VL - 48

SP - 3

EP - 17

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 1

ER -