Involving the public: When are surveys and stakeholder interviews effective?

Nicole Darnall, G. Jason Jolley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars and practitioners alike advocate involving stakeholders in environmental decision making, although there is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of public involvement tools and the degree of public involvement in the decision making process. Some researchers have gone a step further to promote the use of public surveys and stakeholder interviews as preferred means to include public concerns in environmental decision making. However, there is little evidence as to whether public involvement tools are effective at representing public preferences, especially when there is a shortage of technical information to inform public opinion. This study examines the effectiveness of surveys and stakeholder interviews for assessing the District of Columbia's environmental problems in a comparative risk assessment. The findings suggest that these public involvement tools are less effective when there is a shortage of technical data. Instead, more deliberative forms of public involvement may generate greater convergence of opinion regarding environment problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)581-593
Number of pages13
JournalReview of Policy Research
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stakeholder
interview
shortage
decision making
decision making process
risk assessment
public opinion
environmental impact
public
uncertainty
district
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Involving the public : When are surveys and stakeholder interviews effective? / Darnall, Nicole; Jolley, G. Jason.

In: Review of Policy Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 07.2004, p. 581-593.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e923cc118c0f4d989cf017d8191af2aa,
title = "Involving the public: When are surveys and stakeholder interviews effective?",
abstract = "Scholars and practitioners alike advocate involving stakeholders in environmental decision making, although there is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of public involvement tools and the degree of public involvement in the decision making process. Some researchers have gone a step further to promote the use of public surveys and stakeholder interviews as preferred means to include public concerns in environmental decision making. However, there is little evidence as to whether public involvement tools are effective at representing public preferences, especially when there is a shortage of technical information to inform public opinion. This study examines the effectiveness of surveys and stakeholder interviews for assessing the District of Columbia's environmental problems in a comparative risk assessment. The findings suggest that these public involvement tools are less effective when there is a shortage of technical data. Instead, more deliberative forms of public involvement may generate greater convergence of opinion regarding environment problems.",
author = "Nicole Darnall and Jolley, {G. Jason}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00095.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "581--593",
journal = "Review of Policy Research",
issn = "0278-4416",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Involving the public

T2 - When are surveys and stakeholder interviews effective?

AU - Darnall, Nicole

AU - Jolley, G. Jason

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Scholars and practitioners alike advocate involving stakeholders in environmental decision making, although there is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of public involvement tools and the degree of public involvement in the decision making process. Some researchers have gone a step further to promote the use of public surveys and stakeholder interviews as preferred means to include public concerns in environmental decision making. However, there is little evidence as to whether public involvement tools are effective at representing public preferences, especially when there is a shortage of technical information to inform public opinion. This study examines the effectiveness of surveys and stakeholder interviews for assessing the District of Columbia's environmental problems in a comparative risk assessment. The findings suggest that these public involvement tools are less effective when there is a shortage of technical data. Instead, more deliberative forms of public involvement may generate greater convergence of opinion regarding environment problems.

AB - Scholars and practitioners alike advocate involving stakeholders in environmental decision making, although there is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of public involvement tools and the degree of public involvement in the decision making process. Some researchers have gone a step further to promote the use of public surveys and stakeholder interviews as preferred means to include public concerns in environmental decision making. However, there is little evidence as to whether public involvement tools are effective at representing public preferences, especially when there is a shortage of technical information to inform public opinion. This study examines the effectiveness of surveys and stakeholder interviews for assessing the District of Columbia's environmental problems in a comparative risk assessment. The findings suggest that these public involvement tools are less effective when there is a shortage of technical data. Instead, more deliberative forms of public involvement may generate greater convergence of opinion regarding environment problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242875700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242875700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00095.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00095.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3242875700

VL - 21

SP - 581

EP - 593

JO - Review of Policy Research

JF - Review of Policy Research

SN - 0278-4416

IS - 4

ER -