Investigating Reliabilities of Intraindividual Variability Indicators

Lijuan (Peggy) Wang, Kevin Grimm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reliabilities of the two most widely used intraindividual variability indicators, ISD 2 and ISD, are derived analytically. Both are functions of the sizes of the first and second moments of true intraindividual variability, the size of the measurement error variance, and the number of assessments within a burst. For comparison, the reliability of the intraindividual mean, X̄, is also derived. Simulations are conducted to confirm accuracy of the derived functions. The influences of different factors on the reliabilities of these indicators are also studied. Results show that the reliabilities of ISD 2 and ISD are lower than the reliability of X̄ in all studied conditions and the reliability of ISD is lower than that of ISD 2 in most studied conditions. The derived functions are applied to calculate the reliabilities of intraindividual variability indicators of negative affect measured over 56 days and perceptual-motor performance measured over five assessments. Implications for measurement-burst study designs are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)771-802
Number of pages32
JournalMultivariate Behavioral Research
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychomotor Performance
Reproducibility of Results
Burst
Measurement Error
Moment
Calculate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Investigating Reliabilities of Intraindividual Variability Indicators. / Wang, Lijuan (Peggy); Grimm, Kevin.

In: Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 47, No. 5, 09.2012, p. 771-802.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c904315c2cd4b01ae2ef32b214a9fe1,
title = "Investigating Reliabilities of Intraindividual Variability Indicators",
abstract = "Reliabilities of the two most widely used intraindividual variability indicators, ISD 2 and ISD, are derived analytically. Both are functions of the sizes of the first and second moments of true intraindividual variability, the size of the measurement error variance, and the number of assessments within a burst. For comparison, the reliability of the intraindividual mean, X̄, is also derived. Simulations are conducted to confirm accuracy of the derived functions. The influences of different factors on the reliabilities of these indicators are also studied. Results show that the reliabilities of ISD 2 and ISD are lower than the reliability of X̄ in all studied conditions and the reliability of ISD is lower than that of ISD 2 in most studied conditions. The derived functions are applied to calculate the reliabilities of intraindividual variability indicators of negative affect measured over 56 days and perceptual-motor performance measured over five assessments. Implications for measurement-burst study designs are discussed.",
author = "Wang, {Lijuan (Peggy)} and Kevin Grimm",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/00273171.2012.715842",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "771--802",
journal = "Multivariate Behavioral Research",
issn = "0027-3171",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating Reliabilities of Intraindividual Variability Indicators

AU - Wang, Lijuan (Peggy)

AU - Grimm, Kevin

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Reliabilities of the two most widely used intraindividual variability indicators, ISD 2 and ISD, are derived analytically. Both are functions of the sizes of the first and second moments of true intraindividual variability, the size of the measurement error variance, and the number of assessments within a burst. For comparison, the reliability of the intraindividual mean, X̄, is also derived. Simulations are conducted to confirm accuracy of the derived functions. The influences of different factors on the reliabilities of these indicators are also studied. Results show that the reliabilities of ISD 2 and ISD are lower than the reliability of X̄ in all studied conditions and the reliability of ISD is lower than that of ISD 2 in most studied conditions. The derived functions are applied to calculate the reliabilities of intraindividual variability indicators of negative affect measured over 56 days and perceptual-motor performance measured over five assessments. Implications for measurement-burst study designs are discussed.

AB - Reliabilities of the two most widely used intraindividual variability indicators, ISD 2 and ISD, are derived analytically. Both are functions of the sizes of the first and second moments of true intraindividual variability, the size of the measurement error variance, and the number of assessments within a burst. For comparison, the reliability of the intraindividual mean, X̄, is also derived. Simulations are conducted to confirm accuracy of the derived functions. The influences of different factors on the reliabilities of these indicators are also studied. Results show that the reliabilities of ISD 2 and ISD are lower than the reliability of X̄ in all studied conditions and the reliability of ISD is lower than that of ISD 2 in most studied conditions. The derived functions are applied to calculate the reliabilities of intraindividual variability indicators of negative affect measured over 56 days and perceptual-motor performance measured over five assessments. Implications for measurement-burst study designs are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868258165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868258165&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00273171.2012.715842

DO - 10.1080/00273171.2012.715842

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84868258165

VL - 47

SP - 771

EP - 802

JO - Multivariate Behavioral Research

JF - Multivariate Behavioral Research

SN - 0027-3171

IS - 5

ER -