Inventive Megaregions of the United States: Technological Composition and Location

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Urban distinctiveness occurs in both technological and geographic space. This article explores spatial associations in the locational distribution of subcategories of patents across U.S. metropolitan areas. I converted patent counts to location quotients and used nonspatial methods to compare concentration levels of patents (Gini coefficients) and to identify groups of patents that tend to colocate (principal components analysis). The results show considerable variation in concentration levels and that nine groupings, entitled "technology components," account for almost 68 percent of the variance in the distribution of the subcategories. Spatial analysis permits the exploration of spatial dependencies in each "technology component." The results identify distinctive inventive regions that are termed inventive megaregions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-195
Number of pages31
JournalEconomic Geography
Volume88
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

patent
spatial analysis
grouping
metropolitan area
agglomeration area
principal component analysis
Patents
Group
distribution

Keywords

  • Colocation
  • Concentration
  • Invention
  • Locational associations
  • Megaregions
  • Patents
  • Spatial dependence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Inventive Megaregions of the United States : Technological Composition and Location. / O'Huallachain, Breandan.

In: Economic Geography, Vol. 88, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 165-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb0cffc08dc6426eaca946869efceaf6,
title = "Inventive Megaregions of the United States: Technological Composition and Location",
abstract = "Urban distinctiveness occurs in both technological and geographic space. This article explores spatial associations in the locational distribution of subcategories of patents across U.S. metropolitan areas. I converted patent counts to location quotients and used nonspatial methods to compare concentration levels of patents (Gini coefficients) and to identify groups of patents that tend to colocate (principal components analysis). The results show considerable variation in concentration levels and that nine groupings, entitled {"}technology components,{"} account for almost 68 percent of the variance in the distribution of the subcategories. Spatial analysis permits the exploration of spatial dependencies in each {"}technology component.{"} The results identify distinctive inventive regions that are termed inventive megaregions.",
keywords = "Colocation, Concentration, Invention, Locational associations, Megaregions, Patents, Spatial dependence",
author = "Breandan O'Huallachain",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01146.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "165--195",
journal = "Economic Geography",
issn = "0013-0095",
publisher = "Clark University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inventive Megaregions of the United States

T2 - Technological Composition and Location

AU - O'Huallachain, Breandan

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Urban distinctiveness occurs in both technological and geographic space. This article explores spatial associations in the locational distribution of subcategories of patents across U.S. metropolitan areas. I converted patent counts to location quotients and used nonspatial methods to compare concentration levels of patents (Gini coefficients) and to identify groups of patents that tend to colocate (principal components analysis). The results show considerable variation in concentration levels and that nine groupings, entitled "technology components," account for almost 68 percent of the variance in the distribution of the subcategories. Spatial analysis permits the exploration of spatial dependencies in each "technology component." The results identify distinctive inventive regions that are termed inventive megaregions.

AB - Urban distinctiveness occurs in both technological and geographic space. This article explores spatial associations in the locational distribution of subcategories of patents across U.S. metropolitan areas. I converted patent counts to location quotients and used nonspatial methods to compare concentration levels of patents (Gini coefficients) and to identify groups of patents that tend to colocate (principal components analysis). The results show considerable variation in concentration levels and that nine groupings, entitled "technology components," account for almost 68 percent of the variance in the distribution of the subcategories. Spatial analysis permits the exploration of spatial dependencies in each "technology component." The results identify distinctive inventive regions that are termed inventive megaregions.

KW - Colocation

KW - Concentration

KW - Invention

KW - Locational associations

KW - Megaregions

KW - Patents

KW - Spatial dependence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858437320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858437320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01146.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01146.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84858437320

VL - 88

SP - 165

EP - 195

JO - Economic Geography

JF - Economic Geography

SN - 0013-0095

IS - 2

ER -