Invention as a combinatorial process: Evidence from US patents

Hyejin Youn, Deborah Strumsky, Luis M.A. Bettencourt, Jose Lobo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here, we use US patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize invention as a combinatorial process. To do this, we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of 'exploitation' (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and 'exploration' (the development of new technological combinations). This combinatorial dynamic contrasts sharply with the creation of new technological capabilities - the building blocks to be combined - that has significantly slowed down.We also find that, notwithstanding the very reduced rate at which new technologies are introduced, the generation of novel technological combinations engenders a practically infinite space of technological configurations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20150272
JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume12
Issue number106
DOIs
StatePublished - May 6 2015

Fingerprint

Patents
Patents and inventions
Technology
Trademarks

Keywords

  • Complex system
  • Technological change
  • Technological evolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Biophysics
  • Bioengineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Biochemistry
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Invention as a combinatorial process : Evidence from US patents. / Youn, Hyejin; Strumsky, Deborah; Bettencourt, Luis M.A.; Lobo, Jose.

In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Vol. 12, No. 106, 20150272, 06.05.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{59899d572fe1477f94f5e04c3a048987,
title = "Invention as a combinatorial process: Evidence from US patents",
abstract = "Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here, we use US patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize invention as a combinatorial process. To do this, we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of 'exploitation' (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and 'exploration' (the development of new technological combinations). This combinatorial dynamic contrasts sharply with the creation of new technological capabilities - the building blocks to be combined - that has significantly slowed down.We also find that, notwithstanding the very reduced rate at which new technologies are introduced, the generation of novel technological combinations engenders a practically infinite space of technological configurations.",
keywords = "Complex system, Technological change, Technological evolution",
author = "Hyejin Youn and Deborah Strumsky and Bettencourt, {Luis M.A.} and Jose Lobo",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1098/rsif.2015.0272",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Society Interface",
issn = "1742-5689",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "106",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invention as a combinatorial process

T2 - Evidence from US patents

AU - Youn, Hyejin

AU - Strumsky, Deborah

AU - Bettencourt, Luis M.A.

AU - Lobo, Jose

PY - 2015/5/6

Y1 - 2015/5/6

N2 - Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here, we use US patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize invention as a combinatorial process. To do this, we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of 'exploitation' (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and 'exploration' (the development of new technological combinations). This combinatorial dynamic contrasts sharply with the creation of new technological capabilities - the building blocks to be combined - that has significantly slowed down.We also find that, notwithstanding the very reduced rate at which new technologies are introduced, the generation of novel technological combinations engenders a practically infinite space of technological configurations.

AB - Invention has been commonly conceptualized as a search over a space of combinatorial possibilities. Despite the existence of a rich literature, spanning a variety of disciplines, elaborating on the recombinant nature of invention, we lack a formal and quantitative characterization of the combinatorial process underpinning inventive activity. Here, we use US patent records dating from 1790 to 2010 to formally characterize invention as a combinatorial process. To do this, we treat patented inventions as carriers of technologies and avail ourselves of the elaborate system of technology codes used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to classify the technologies responsible for an invention's novelty. We find that the combinatorial inventive process exhibits an invariant rate of 'exploitation' (refinements of existing combinations of technologies) and 'exploration' (the development of new technological combinations). This combinatorial dynamic contrasts sharply with the creation of new technological capabilities - the building blocks to be combined - that has significantly slowed down.We also find that, notwithstanding the very reduced rate at which new technologies are introduced, the generation of novel technological combinations engenders a practically infinite space of technological configurations.

KW - Complex system

KW - Technological change

KW - Technological evolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929500827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929500827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2015.0272

DO - 10.1098/rsif.2015.0272

M3 - Article

C2 - 25904530

AN - SCOPUS:84929500827

VL - 12

JO - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

JF - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

SN - 1742-5689

IS - 106

M1 - 20150272

ER -