TY - JOUR
T1 - Introduction to the Special Issue on Dialogue 2.0
T2 - New Perspectives, Enduring Challenges, and Promising Directions
AU - Jameson, Jessica Katz
AU - Lee, Nicole M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors wish to acknowledge a lightning rod grant from the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at North Carolina State Unversity which helped support the Dialog 2.0 event and made this special issue possible.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The current state of polarization evidenced in communication around race, politics, criminal justice, immigration, health care, and other critical social issues highlights the challenges of talking about our most enduring, “wicked” problems. This increased polarization has been shown to result in self-monitoring of media consumption (both traditional and social) such that people are more likely to engage with sources that support existing beliefs rather than seek information that crosses views and values. The motivation for this special issue came from an interdisciplinary symposium hosted by North Carolina State University’s Communication, Rhetoric and Digital Media (CRDM) doctoral program that took place from 28 March to 30 March 2019 and included participants from across the United States. The symposium was titled “Dialog 2.0: Social Movements, Online Communication and Transformation.” The seven articles that comprise this special issue include symposium participants along with the voices of other scholars around the world who are thinking about and investigating social media and dialogic communication. While the authors in this special issue offer different conceptions of dialogue, it is broadly conceived as communication that is inclusive of multiple voices (especially those that have been marginalized) and aimed at improving understanding rather than persuading or “winning.”
AB - The current state of polarization evidenced in communication around race, politics, criminal justice, immigration, health care, and other critical social issues highlights the challenges of talking about our most enduring, “wicked” problems. This increased polarization has been shown to result in self-monitoring of media consumption (both traditional and social) such that people are more likely to engage with sources that support existing beliefs rather than seek information that crosses views and values. The motivation for this special issue came from an interdisciplinary symposium hosted by North Carolina State University’s Communication, Rhetoric and Digital Media (CRDM) doctoral program that took place from 28 March to 30 March 2019 and included participants from across the United States. The symposium was titled “Dialog 2.0: Social Movements, Online Communication and Transformation.” The seven articles that comprise this special issue include symposium participants along with the voices of other scholars around the world who are thinking about and investigating social media and dialogic communication. While the authors in this special issue offer different conceptions of dialogue, it is broadly conceived as communication that is inclusive of multiple voices (especially those that have been marginalized) and aimed at improving understanding rather than persuading or “winning.”
KW - activism
KW - dialogue
KW - marginalization
KW - power
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098507397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098507397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2056305120984468
DO - 10.1177/2056305120984468
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098507397
SN - 2056-3051
VL - 6
JO - Social Media and Society
JF - Social Media and Society
IS - 4
ER -