Introduction

Does information matter?

Paul Davies, Niels Henrik Gregersen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is no longer a secret that inherited notions of matter and the material world have not been able to sustain the revolutionary developments of twentieth-century physics and biology. For centuries Isaac Newton's idea of matter as consisting of ‘solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, and movable particles' reigned in combination with a strong view of laws of nature that were supposed to prescribe exactly, on the basis of the present physical situation, what was going to happen in the future. This complex of scientific materialism and mechanism was easily amalgamated with common-sense assumptions of solid matter as the bedrock of all reality. In the world view of classical materialism (having its heyday between 1650 and 1900), it was claimed that all physical systems are nothing but collections of inert particles slavishly complying with deterministic laws. Complex systems such as living organisms, societies, and human persons, could, according to this reductionist world view, ultimately be explained in terms of material components and their chemical interactions. However, the emergence of thermodynamics around 1850 already began to cast doubt on the universal scope of determinism. Without initially questioning the inherited concepts of corpuscular matter and mechanism, it turned out that the physics of fluids and gases in thermodynamically open systems can be tackled, from a practical point of view, only by using statistical methods; the aim of tracking individual molecules had to be abandoned.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInformation and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
Volume9780521762250
ISBN (Print)9780511778759, 9780521762250
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

physics
bedrock
complex systems
biology
organisms
newton
casts
thermodynamics
fluids
gases
molecules
interactions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Davies, P., & Gregersen, N. H. (2010). Introduction: Does information matter? In Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics (Vol. 9780521762250, pp. 1-10). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778759.001

Introduction : Does information matter? / Davies, Paul; Gregersen, Niels Henrik.

Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics. Vol. 9780521762250 Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 1-10.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Davies, P & Gregersen, NH 2010, Introduction: Does information matter? in Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics. vol. 9780521762250, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778759.001
Davies P, Gregersen NH. Introduction: Does information matter? In Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics. Vol. 9780521762250. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778759.001
Davies, Paul ; Gregersen, Niels Henrik. / Introduction : Does information matter?. Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics. Vol. 9780521762250 Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 1-10
@inbook{5fab9ceb67a14f03a2dd1993f870ce09,
title = "Introduction: Does information matter?",
abstract = "It is no longer a secret that inherited notions of matter and the material world have not been able to sustain the revolutionary developments of twentieth-century physics and biology. For centuries Isaac Newton's idea of matter as consisting of ‘solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, and movable particles' reigned in combination with a strong view of laws of nature that were supposed to prescribe exactly, on the basis of the present physical situation, what was going to happen in the future. This complex of scientific materialism and mechanism was easily amalgamated with common-sense assumptions of solid matter as the bedrock of all reality. In the world view of classical materialism (having its heyday between 1650 and 1900), it was claimed that all physical systems are nothing but collections of inert particles slavishly complying with deterministic laws. Complex systems such as living organisms, societies, and human persons, could, according to this reductionist world view, ultimately be explained in terms of material components and their chemical interactions. However, the emergence of thermodynamics around 1850 already began to cast doubt on the universal scope of determinism. Without initially questioning the inherited concepts of corpuscular matter and mechanism, it turned out that the physics of fluids and gases in thermodynamically open systems can be tackled, from a practical point of view, only by using statistical methods; the aim of tracking individual molecules had to be abandoned.",
author = "Paul Davies and Gregersen, {Niels Henrik}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511778759.001",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511778759",
volume = "9780521762250",
pages = "1--10",
booktitle = "Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

T2 - Does information matter?

AU - Davies, Paul

AU - Gregersen, Niels Henrik

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - It is no longer a secret that inherited notions of matter and the material world have not been able to sustain the revolutionary developments of twentieth-century physics and biology. For centuries Isaac Newton's idea of matter as consisting of ‘solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, and movable particles' reigned in combination with a strong view of laws of nature that were supposed to prescribe exactly, on the basis of the present physical situation, what was going to happen in the future. This complex of scientific materialism and mechanism was easily amalgamated with common-sense assumptions of solid matter as the bedrock of all reality. In the world view of classical materialism (having its heyday between 1650 and 1900), it was claimed that all physical systems are nothing but collections of inert particles slavishly complying with deterministic laws. Complex systems such as living organisms, societies, and human persons, could, according to this reductionist world view, ultimately be explained in terms of material components and their chemical interactions. However, the emergence of thermodynamics around 1850 already began to cast doubt on the universal scope of determinism. Without initially questioning the inherited concepts of corpuscular matter and mechanism, it turned out that the physics of fluids and gases in thermodynamically open systems can be tackled, from a practical point of view, only by using statistical methods; the aim of tracking individual molecules had to be abandoned.

AB - It is no longer a secret that inherited notions of matter and the material world have not been able to sustain the revolutionary developments of twentieth-century physics and biology. For centuries Isaac Newton's idea of matter as consisting of ‘solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, and movable particles' reigned in combination with a strong view of laws of nature that were supposed to prescribe exactly, on the basis of the present physical situation, what was going to happen in the future. This complex of scientific materialism and mechanism was easily amalgamated with common-sense assumptions of solid matter as the bedrock of all reality. In the world view of classical materialism (having its heyday between 1650 and 1900), it was claimed that all physical systems are nothing but collections of inert particles slavishly complying with deterministic laws. Complex systems such as living organisms, societies, and human persons, could, according to this reductionist world view, ultimately be explained in terms of material components and their chemical interactions. However, the emergence of thermodynamics around 1850 already began to cast doubt on the universal scope of determinism. Without initially questioning the inherited concepts of corpuscular matter and mechanism, it turned out that the physics of fluids and gases in thermodynamically open systems can be tackled, from a practical point of view, only by using statistical methods; the aim of tracking individual molecules had to be abandoned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926981030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926981030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511778759.001

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511778759.001

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511778759

SN - 9780521762250

VL - 9780521762250

SP - 1

EP - 10

BT - Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -