Interpreting procedures from descriptive guidelines

Mor Peleg, Lily A. Gutnik, Vincenza Snow, Vimla Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Errors in clinical practice guidelines may translate into errors in real-world clinical practice. The best way to eliminate these errors is to understand how they are generated, thus enabling the future development of methods to catch errors made in creating the guideline before publication. We examined the process by which a medical expert from the American College of Physicians (ACP) created clinical algorithms from narrative guidelines, as a case study. We studied this process by looking at intermediate versions produced during the algorithm creation. We identified and analyzed errors that were generated at each stage, categorized them using Knuth's classification scheme, and studied patterns of errors that were made over the set of algorithm versions that were created. We then assessed possible explanations for the sources of these errors and provided recommendations for reducing the number of errors, based on cognitive theory and on experience drawn from software engineering methodologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-195
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Biomedical Informatics
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Practice Guidelines
Publications
Research Design
Software
Physicians
Software engineering

Keywords

  • Case study
  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Cognitive studies
  • Computer-interpretable guidelines
  • Decision support
  • Knuth's classification scheme
  • Software engineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Interpreting procedures from descriptive guidelines. / Peleg, Mor; Gutnik, Lily A.; Snow, Vincenza; Patel, Vimla.

In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 01.04.2006, p. 184-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peleg, Mor ; Gutnik, Lily A. ; Snow, Vincenza ; Patel, Vimla. / Interpreting procedures from descriptive guidelines. In: Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2006 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 184-195.
@article{ab3c4f028c184300b50537a088c49b3d,
title = "Interpreting procedures from descriptive guidelines",
abstract = "Errors in clinical practice guidelines may translate into errors in real-world clinical practice. The best way to eliminate these errors is to understand how they are generated, thus enabling the future development of methods to catch errors made in creating the guideline before publication. We examined the process by which a medical expert from the American College of Physicians (ACP) created clinical algorithms from narrative guidelines, as a case study. We studied this process by looking at intermediate versions produced during the algorithm creation. We identified and analyzed errors that were generated at each stage, categorized them using Knuth's classification scheme, and studied patterns of errors that were made over the set of algorithm versions that were created. We then assessed possible explanations for the sources of these errors and provided recommendations for reducing the number of errors, based on cognitive theory and on experience drawn from software engineering methodologies.",
keywords = "Case study, Clinical practice guidelines, Cognitive studies, Computer-interpretable guidelines, Decision support, Knuth's classification scheme, Software engineering",
author = "Mor Peleg and Gutnik, {Lily A.} and Vincenza Snow and Vimla Patel",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbi.2005.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "184--195",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Informatics",
issn = "1532-0464",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting procedures from descriptive guidelines

AU - Peleg, Mor

AU - Gutnik, Lily A.

AU - Snow, Vincenza

AU - Patel, Vimla

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - Errors in clinical practice guidelines may translate into errors in real-world clinical practice. The best way to eliminate these errors is to understand how they are generated, thus enabling the future development of methods to catch errors made in creating the guideline before publication. We examined the process by which a medical expert from the American College of Physicians (ACP) created clinical algorithms from narrative guidelines, as a case study. We studied this process by looking at intermediate versions produced during the algorithm creation. We identified and analyzed errors that were generated at each stage, categorized them using Knuth's classification scheme, and studied patterns of errors that were made over the set of algorithm versions that were created. We then assessed possible explanations for the sources of these errors and provided recommendations for reducing the number of errors, based on cognitive theory and on experience drawn from software engineering methodologies.

AB - Errors in clinical practice guidelines may translate into errors in real-world clinical practice. The best way to eliminate these errors is to understand how they are generated, thus enabling the future development of methods to catch errors made in creating the guideline before publication. We examined the process by which a medical expert from the American College of Physicians (ACP) created clinical algorithms from narrative guidelines, as a case study. We studied this process by looking at intermediate versions produced during the algorithm creation. We identified and analyzed errors that were generated at each stage, categorized them using Knuth's classification scheme, and studied patterns of errors that were made over the set of algorithm versions that were created. We then assessed possible explanations for the sources of these errors and provided recommendations for reducing the number of errors, based on cognitive theory and on experience drawn from software engineering methodologies.

KW - Case study

KW - Clinical practice guidelines

KW - Cognitive studies

KW - Computer-interpretable guidelines

KW - Decision support

KW - Knuth's classification scheme

KW - Software engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644955795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644955795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.06.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 16099725

AN - SCOPUS:33644955795

VL - 39

SP - 184

EP - 195

JO - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

JF - Journal of Biomedical Informatics

SN - 1532-0464

IS - 2

ER -