International regulation without international government

Improving IO performance through orchestration

Kenneth Abbott, Duncan Snidal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

International organizations (IOs) have been widely criticized as ineffective. Yet scholars and practitioners assessing IO performance frequently focus on traditional modes of governance such as treaties and inter-state dispute-resolution mechanisms. When they observe poor performance, moreover, they often prescribe a strengthening of those same activities. We call this reliance on traditional state-based mechanisms "International Old Governance" (IOG). A better way to understand and improve IO performance is to consider the full range of ways in which IOs can and do operate-including, increasingly, by reaching out to private actors and institutions, collaborating with them, and supporting and shaping their activities. Such actions are helping to develop an intricate global network of public, private and mixed institutions and norms, partially orchestrated by IOs, that we call "Transnational New Governance" (TNG). With proper orchestration by IOs, TNG can ameliorate both "state failure"-the inadequacies of IOG-and "market failure"-the problems that result when the creation and evolution of norm-setting institutions is highly decentralized. Orchestration thus provides a significant way for IOs to improve their regulatory performance. Some IOs already engage actively with private actors and institutions-we provide a range of illustrations, highlighting the activities of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP). Yet there remains a significant "orchestration deficit" that provides real opportunities for IOs. We draw on the lessons of existing IO activities to suggest additional possibilities for improving IO performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-344
Number of pages30
JournalReview of International Organizations
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

International Organizations
regulation
performance
governance
setting of norms
International organizations
International regulation
Government
Orchestration
Organizational performance
failure of the state
market failure
treaty
UNO
deficit
Governance

Keywords

  • Governance Triangle
  • International organizations
  • New governance
  • Non-state actors
  • Public-private partnerships
  • Regulation
  • Regulatory standard setting
  • Standard setting
  • Transnational new governance
  • Transnational relations
  • UNEP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

International regulation without international government : Improving IO performance through orchestration. / Abbott, Kenneth; Snidal, Duncan.

In: Review of International Organizations, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2010, p. 315-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{66f54726c04444b3b8fb8765e8c07003,
title = "International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration",
abstract = "International organizations (IOs) have been widely criticized as ineffective. Yet scholars and practitioners assessing IO performance frequently focus on traditional modes of governance such as treaties and inter-state dispute-resolution mechanisms. When they observe poor performance, moreover, they often prescribe a strengthening of those same activities. We call this reliance on traditional state-based mechanisms {"}International Old Governance{"} (IOG). A better way to understand and improve IO performance is to consider the full range of ways in which IOs can and do operate-including, increasingly, by reaching out to private actors and institutions, collaborating with them, and supporting and shaping their activities. Such actions are helping to develop an intricate global network of public, private and mixed institutions and norms, partially orchestrated by IOs, that we call {"}Transnational New Governance{"} (TNG). With proper orchestration by IOs, TNG can ameliorate both {"}state failure{"}-the inadequacies of IOG-and {"}market failure{"}-the problems that result when the creation and evolution of norm-setting institutions is highly decentralized. Orchestration thus provides a significant way for IOs to improve their regulatory performance. Some IOs already engage actively with private actors and institutions-we provide a range of illustrations, highlighting the activities of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP). Yet there remains a significant {"}orchestration deficit{"} that provides real opportunities for IOs. We draw on the lessons of existing IO activities to suggest additional possibilities for improving IO performance.",
keywords = "Governance Triangle, International organizations, New governance, Non-state actors, Public-private partnerships, Regulation, Regulatory standard setting, Standard setting, Transnational new governance, Transnational relations, UNEP",
author = "Kenneth Abbott and Duncan Snidal",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s11558-010-9092-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "315--344",
journal = "Review of International Organizations",
issn = "1559-7431",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International regulation without international government

T2 - Improving IO performance through orchestration

AU - Abbott, Kenneth

AU - Snidal, Duncan

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - International organizations (IOs) have been widely criticized as ineffective. Yet scholars and practitioners assessing IO performance frequently focus on traditional modes of governance such as treaties and inter-state dispute-resolution mechanisms. When they observe poor performance, moreover, they often prescribe a strengthening of those same activities. We call this reliance on traditional state-based mechanisms "International Old Governance" (IOG). A better way to understand and improve IO performance is to consider the full range of ways in which IOs can and do operate-including, increasingly, by reaching out to private actors and institutions, collaborating with them, and supporting and shaping their activities. Such actions are helping to develop an intricate global network of public, private and mixed institutions and norms, partially orchestrated by IOs, that we call "Transnational New Governance" (TNG). With proper orchestration by IOs, TNG can ameliorate both "state failure"-the inadequacies of IOG-and "market failure"-the problems that result when the creation and evolution of norm-setting institutions is highly decentralized. Orchestration thus provides a significant way for IOs to improve their regulatory performance. Some IOs already engage actively with private actors and institutions-we provide a range of illustrations, highlighting the activities of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP). Yet there remains a significant "orchestration deficit" that provides real opportunities for IOs. We draw on the lessons of existing IO activities to suggest additional possibilities for improving IO performance.

AB - International organizations (IOs) have been widely criticized as ineffective. Yet scholars and practitioners assessing IO performance frequently focus on traditional modes of governance such as treaties and inter-state dispute-resolution mechanisms. When they observe poor performance, moreover, they often prescribe a strengthening of those same activities. We call this reliance on traditional state-based mechanisms "International Old Governance" (IOG). A better way to understand and improve IO performance is to consider the full range of ways in which IOs can and do operate-including, increasingly, by reaching out to private actors and institutions, collaborating with them, and supporting and shaping their activities. Such actions are helping to develop an intricate global network of public, private and mixed institutions and norms, partially orchestrated by IOs, that we call "Transnational New Governance" (TNG). With proper orchestration by IOs, TNG can ameliorate both "state failure"-the inadequacies of IOG-and "market failure"-the problems that result when the creation and evolution of norm-setting institutions is highly decentralized. Orchestration thus provides a significant way for IOs to improve their regulatory performance. Some IOs already engage actively with private actors and institutions-we provide a range of illustrations, highlighting the activities of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP). Yet there remains a significant "orchestration deficit" that provides real opportunities for IOs. We draw on the lessons of existing IO activities to suggest additional possibilities for improving IO performance.

KW - Governance Triangle

KW - International organizations

KW - New governance

KW - Non-state actors

KW - Public-private partnerships

KW - Regulation

KW - Regulatory standard setting

KW - Standard setting

KW - Transnational new governance

KW - Transnational relations

KW - UNEP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956489655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956489655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11558-010-9092-3

DO - 10.1007/s11558-010-9092-3

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 315

EP - 344

JO - Review of International Organizations

JF - Review of International Organizations

SN - 1559-7431

IS - 3

ER -