Abstract

The governance of nanotechnology has two distinct aspects. First, because every developed nation is simultaneously developing the technology and regulatory oversight for nanotechnology, there is an unprecedented interest and effort in international harmonization of governance. Second, given the many challenges with traditional regulatory approaches to nanotechnology, "soft law" approaches that rely on non-binding requirements have been particularly prevalent for nano-technology. This article reviews a number of international soft law initiatives for nanotechnology, created by and involving a variety of different stakeholders including government, industry, non-governmental organizations and other third party entities. Although the implementation and impacts of these programs have been inconsistent and limited to date, the experience with nanotechnology is providing useful lessons and precedent for the role of soft law mechanisms in the international governance of emerging technologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)393-410
Number of pages18
JournalNanotechnology Law and Business
Volume9
Issue number4
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
harmonization
Nanotechnology
governance
Law
international law
stakeholder
industry
Industry
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Law
  • Bioengineering

Cite this

International harmonization of nanotechnology governance through "soft law" approaches. / Marchant, Gary; Abbott, Kenneth.

In: Nanotechnology Law and Business, Vol. 9, No. 4, 03.2013, p. 393-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{871093937cda45c9b03193d5ec3d6c61,
title = "International harmonization of nanotechnology governance through {"}soft law{"} approaches",
abstract = "The governance of nanotechnology has two distinct aspects. First, because every developed nation is simultaneously developing the technology and regulatory oversight for nanotechnology, there is an unprecedented interest and effort in international harmonization of governance. Second, given the many challenges with traditional regulatory approaches to nanotechnology, {"}soft law{"} approaches that rely on non-binding requirements have been particularly prevalent for nano-technology. This article reviews a number of international soft law initiatives for nanotechnology, created by and involving a variety of different stakeholders including government, industry, non-governmental organizations and other third party entities. Although the implementation and impacts of these programs have been inconsistent and limited to date, the experience with nanotechnology is providing useful lessons and precedent for the role of soft law mechanisms in the international governance of emerging technologies.",
author = "Gary Marchant and Kenneth Abbott",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "393--410",
journal = "Nanotechnology Law and Business",
issn = "1546-2080",
publisher = "Nanotechnology Law and Business",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International harmonization of nanotechnology governance through "soft law" approaches

AU - Marchant, Gary

AU - Abbott, Kenneth

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The governance of nanotechnology has two distinct aspects. First, because every developed nation is simultaneously developing the technology and regulatory oversight for nanotechnology, there is an unprecedented interest and effort in international harmonization of governance. Second, given the many challenges with traditional regulatory approaches to nanotechnology, "soft law" approaches that rely on non-binding requirements have been particularly prevalent for nano-technology. This article reviews a number of international soft law initiatives for nanotechnology, created by and involving a variety of different stakeholders including government, industry, non-governmental organizations and other third party entities. Although the implementation and impacts of these programs have been inconsistent and limited to date, the experience with nanotechnology is providing useful lessons and precedent for the role of soft law mechanisms in the international governance of emerging technologies.

AB - The governance of nanotechnology has two distinct aspects. First, because every developed nation is simultaneously developing the technology and regulatory oversight for nanotechnology, there is an unprecedented interest and effort in international harmonization of governance. Second, given the many challenges with traditional regulatory approaches to nanotechnology, "soft law" approaches that rely on non-binding requirements have been particularly prevalent for nano-technology. This article reviews a number of international soft law initiatives for nanotechnology, created by and involving a variety of different stakeholders including government, industry, non-governmental organizations and other third party entities. Although the implementation and impacts of these programs have been inconsistent and limited to date, the experience with nanotechnology is providing useful lessons and precedent for the role of soft law mechanisms in the international governance of emerging technologies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881512355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881512355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 393

EP - 410

JO - Nanotechnology Law and Business

JF - Nanotechnology Law and Business

SN - 1546-2080

IS - 4

ER -