Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production

Wanyue Wang, Travis Johnson, Robert L. Sainburg, Natalia Dounskaia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Directional preferences during center-out horizontal shoulder-elbow movements were previously characterized for the dominant arm. These preferences were attributed to a tendency to actively accelerate one joint, while exploiting largely passive motion at the other joint. Since the non-dominant arm is known for inefficient coordination of inter-segmental dynamics, here we hypothesized that directional preferences would differ between the arms. A center-out free-stroke drawing task was used that allowed freedom in the selection of movement directions. The task was performed both with and without a secondary cognitive task that has been shown to increase directional biases of the dominant arm. Mirror-symmetrical directional preferences were observed in both arms, with similar bias strength and secondary task effects. The preferred directions were characterized by maximal exploitation of interaction torques for movement production, but only in the dominant arm. The non-dominant arm failed to benefit from interaction torques. The results point to a hierarchical architecture of control. At the higher level, a movement capable to perform the task while satisfying preferences in joint control is specified through forward dynamic transformations. This process is mediated for both arms from a common neural network adapted to the dominant arm and, specifically, to its ability to exploit interaction torques. Dynamic transformations that determine actual control commands are specified at the lower level of control. An alternative interpretation that strokes might be planned evenly across directions, and biases emerge during movement execution due to anisotropic resistance of intrinsic factors that do not depend on arm dominance is also discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-274
Number of pages12
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume216
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Arm
Stroke
Torque
Joints
Intrinsic Factor
R Factors
Elbow
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Arm movements
  • Interaction torque
  • Internal model
  • Multijoint
  • Optimal control
  • Secondary task

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production. / Wang, Wanyue; Johnson, Travis; Sainburg, Robert L.; Dounskaia, Natalia.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 216, No. 2, 01.2012, p. 263-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, Wanyue ; Johnson, Travis ; Sainburg, Robert L. ; Dounskaia, Natalia. / Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2012 ; Vol. 216, No. 2. pp. 263-274.
@article{f89666a3a15749f5a1730088857afb42,
title = "Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production",
abstract = "Directional preferences during center-out horizontal shoulder-elbow movements were previously characterized for the dominant arm. These preferences were attributed to a tendency to actively accelerate one joint, while exploiting largely passive motion at the other joint. Since the non-dominant arm is known for inefficient coordination of inter-segmental dynamics, here we hypothesized that directional preferences would differ between the arms. A center-out free-stroke drawing task was used that allowed freedom in the selection of movement directions. The task was performed both with and without a secondary cognitive task that has been shown to increase directional biases of the dominant arm. Mirror-symmetrical directional preferences were observed in both arms, with similar bias strength and secondary task effects. The preferred directions were characterized by maximal exploitation of interaction torques for movement production, but only in the dominant arm. The non-dominant arm failed to benefit from interaction torques. The results point to a hierarchical architecture of control. At the higher level, a movement capable to perform the task while satisfying preferences in joint control is specified through forward dynamic transformations. This process is mediated for both arms from a common neural network adapted to the dominant arm and, specifically, to its ability to exploit interaction torques. Dynamic transformations that determine actual control commands are specified at the lower level of control. An alternative interpretation that strokes might be planned evenly across directions, and biases emerge during movement execution due to anisotropic resistance of intrinsic factors that do not depend on arm dominance is also discussed.",
keywords = "Arm movements, Interaction torque, Internal model, Multijoint, Optimal control, Secondary task",
author = "Wanyue Wang and Travis Johnson and Sainburg, {Robert L.} and Natalia Dounskaia",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-011-2927-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "216",
pages = "263--274",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production

AU - Wang, Wanyue

AU - Johnson, Travis

AU - Sainburg, Robert L.

AU - Dounskaia, Natalia

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Directional preferences during center-out horizontal shoulder-elbow movements were previously characterized for the dominant arm. These preferences were attributed to a tendency to actively accelerate one joint, while exploiting largely passive motion at the other joint. Since the non-dominant arm is known for inefficient coordination of inter-segmental dynamics, here we hypothesized that directional preferences would differ between the arms. A center-out free-stroke drawing task was used that allowed freedom in the selection of movement directions. The task was performed both with and without a secondary cognitive task that has been shown to increase directional biases of the dominant arm. Mirror-symmetrical directional preferences were observed in both arms, with similar bias strength and secondary task effects. The preferred directions were characterized by maximal exploitation of interaction torques for movement production, but only in the dominant arm. The non-dominant arm failed to benefit from interaction torques. The results point to a hierarchical architecture of control. At the higher level, a movement capable to perform the task while satisfying preferences in joint control is specified through forward dynamic transformations. This process is mediated for both arms from a common neural network adapted to the dominant arm and, specifically, to its ability to exploit interaction torques. Dynamic transformations that determine actual control commands are specified at the lower level of control. An alternative interpretation that strokes might be planned evenly across directions, and biases emerge during movement execution due to anisotropic resistance of intrinsic factors that do not depend on arm dominance is also discussed.

AB - Directional preferences during center-out horizontal shoulder-elbow movements were previously characterized for the dominant arm. These preferences were attributed to a tendency to actively accelerate one joint, while exploiting largely passive motion at the other joint. Since the non-dominant arm is known for inefficient coordination of inter-segmental dynamics, here we hypothesized that directional preferences would differ between the arms. A center-out free-stroke drawing task was used that allowed freedom in the selection of movement directions. The task was performed both with and without a secondary cognitive task that has been shown to increase directional biases of the dominant arm. Mirror-symmetrical directional preferences were observed in both arms, with similar bias strength and secondary task effects. The preferred directions were characterized by maximal exploitation of interaction torques for movement production, but only in the dominant arm. The non-dominant arm failed to benefit from interaction torques. The results point to a hierarchical architecture of control. At the higher level, a movement capable to perform the task while satisfying preferences in joint control is specified through forward dynamic transformations. This process is mediated for both arms from a common neural network adapted to the dominant arm and, specifically, to its ability to exploit interaction torques. Dynamic transformations that determine actual control commands are specified at the lower level of control. An alternative interpretation that strokes might be planned evenly across directions, and biases emerge during movement execution due to anisotropic resistance of intrinsic factors that do not depend on arm dominance is also discussed.

KW - Arm movements

KW - Interaction torque

KW - Internal model

KW - Multijoint

KW - Optimal control

KW - Secondary task

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856266040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856266040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-011-2927-1

DO - 10.1007/s00221-011-2927-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 22076406

AN - SCOPUS:84856266040

VL - 216

SP - 263

EP - 274

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 2

ER -