Interference within the focus of attention: Working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance

Zach Shipstead, Randall W. Engle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One approach to understanding working memory (WM) holds that individual differences in WM capacity arise from the amount of information a person can store in WM over short periods of time. This view is especially prevalent in WM research conducted with the visual arrays task. Within this tradition, many researchers have concluded that the average person can maintain approximately 4 items in WM. The present study challenges this interpretation by demonstrating that performance on the visual arrays task is subject to time-related factors that are associated with retrieval from long-term memory. Experiment 1 demonstrates that memory for an array does not decay as a product of absolute time, which is consistent with both maintenance- and retrieval-based explanations of visual arrays performance. Experiment 2 introduced a manipulation of temporal discriminability by varying the relative spacing of trials in time. We found that memory for a target array was significantly influenced by its temporal compression with, or isolation from, a preceding trial. Subsequent experiments extend these effects to sub-capacity set sizes and demonstrate that changes in the size of k are meaningful to prediction of performance on other measures of WM capacity as well as general fluid intelligence. We conclude that performance on the visual arrays task does not reflect a multi-item storage system but instead measures a person's ability to accurately retrieve information in the face of proactive interference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-289
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
interference
Maintenance
Aptitude
performance
human being
Long-Term Memory
experiment
Intelligence
Individuality
Working Memory
Focus of Attention
Interference
Research Personnel
Person
Experiment
manipulation
social isolation
intelligence
Research

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Temporal discriminability
  • Visual arrays
  • Working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Interference within the focus of attention : Working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance. / Shipstead, Zach; Engle, Randall W.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 277-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e4121a8bb2f423393e1ae1f62247a1c,
title = "Interference within the focus of attention: Working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance",
abstract = "One approach to understanding working memory (WM) holds that individual differences in WM capacity arise from the amount of information a person can store in WM over short periods of time. This view is especially prevalent in WM research conducted with the visual arrays task. Within this tradition, many researchers have concluded that the average person can maintain approximately 4 items in WM. The present study challenges this interpretation by demonstrating that performance on the visual arrays task is subject to time-related factors that are associated with retrieval from long-term memory. Experiment 1 demonstrates that memory for an array does not decay as a product of absolute time, which is consistent with both maintenance- and retrieval-based explanations of visual arrays performance. Experiment 2 introduced a manipulation of temporal discriminability by varying the relative spacing of trials in time. We found that memory for a target array was significantly influenced by its temporal compression with, or isolation from, a preceding trial. Subsequent experiments extend these effects to sub-capacity set sizes and demonstrate that changes in the size of k are meaningful to prediction of performance on other measures of WM capacity as well as general fluid intelligence. We conclude that performance on the visual arrays task does not reflect a multi-item storage system but instead measures a person's ability to accurately retrieve information in the face of proactive interference.",
keywords = "Attention, Temporal discriminability, Visual arrays, Working memory",
author = "Zach Shipstead and Engle, {Randall W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0028467",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "277--289",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interference within the focus of attention

T2 - Working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance

AU - Shipstead, Zach

AU - Engle, Randall W.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - One approach to understanding working memory (WM) holds that individual differences in WM capacity arise from the amount of information a person can store in WM over short periods of time. This view is especially prevalent in WM research conducted with the visual arrays task. Within this tradition, many researchers have concluded that the average person can maintain approximately 4 items in WM. The present study challenges this interpretation by demonstrating that performance on the visual arrays task is subject to time-related factors that are associated with retrieval from long-term memory. Experiment 1 demonstrates that memory for an array does not decay as a product of absolute time, which is consistent with both maintenance- and retrieval-based explanations of visual arrays performance. Experiment 2 introduced a manipulation of temporal discriminability by varying the relative spacing of trials in time. We found that memory for a target array was significantly influenced by its temporal compression with, or isolation from, a preceding trial. Subsequent experiments extend these effects to sub-capacity set sizes and demonstrate that changes in the size of k are meaningful to prediction of performance on other measures of WM capacity as well as general fluid intelligence. We conclude that performance on the visual arrays task does not reflect a multi-item storage system but instead measures a person's ability to accurately retrieve information in the face of proactive interference.

AB - One approach to understanding working memory (WM) holds that individual differences in WM capacity arise from the amount of information a person can store in WM over short periods of time. This view is especially prevalent in WM research conducted with the visual arrays task. Within this tradition, many researchers have concluded that the average person can maintain approximately 4 items in WM. The present study challenges this interpretation by demonstrating that performance on the visual arrays task is subject to time-related factors that are associated with retrieval from long-term memory. Experiment 1 demonstrates that memory for an array does not decay as a product of absolute time, which is consistent with both maintenance- and retrieval-based explanations of visual arrays performance. Experiment 2 introduced a manipulation of temporal discriminability by varying the relative spacing of trials in time. We found that memory for a target array was significantly influenced by its temporal compression with, or isolation from, a preceding trial. Subsequent experiments extend these effects to sub-capacity set sizes and demonstrate that changes in the size of k are meaningful to prediction of performance on other measures of WM capacity as well as general fluid intelligence. We conclude that performance on the visual arrays task does not reflect a multi-item storage system but instead measures a person's ability to accurately retrieve information in the face of proactive interference.

KW - Attention

KW - Temporal discriminability

KW - Visual arrays

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875541703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875541703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0028467

DO - 10.1037/a0028467

M3 - Article

C2 - 22612165

AN - SCOPUS:84875541703

VL - 39

SP - 277

EP - 289

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 1

ER -