Interdistrict disparity in sentencing in three U.S. District Courts

Jawjeong Wu, Cassia Spohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research examining disparities in sentencing outcomes under federal sentencing guidelines has focused almost exclusively on aggregate national data. Although these studies contribute considerably to the criminological literature on sentencing disparity, their findings may have masked contextual variation in relation to case processing across jurisdictions. With data from the U.S. District Courts for Minnesota, Nebraska, and Southern Iowa for 1998 through 2000, this article assesses whether interdistrict variations in sentence outcomes exist and whether the factors that affect these outcomes vary across jurisdictions. It also attempts to determine whether disparities in sentence outcomes can be attributed to downward departures. The findings raise questions about the validity of the assumption of uniformity in the federal sentencing process and the use of aggregate data to study federal sentence outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-322
Number of pages33
JournalCrime and Delinquency
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

district court
Guidelines
jurisdiction
Research
aggregate data

Keywords

  • Downward departures
  • Federal sentencing guidelines
  • Sentencing disparity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Interdistrict disparity in sentencing in three U.S. District Courts. / Wu, Jawjeong; Spohn, Cassia.

In: Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 56, No. 2, 04.2010, p. 290-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5ff60f55d3dc47fba5e247ac478714de,
title = "Interdistrict disparity in sentencing in three U.S. District Courts",
abstract = "Research examining disparities in sentencing outcomes under federal sentencing guidelines has focused almost exclusively on aggregate national data. Although these studies contribute considerably to the criminological literature on sentencing disparity, their findings may have masked contextual variation in relation to case processing across jurisdictions. With data from the U.S. District Courts for Minnesota, Nebraska, and Southern Iowa for 1998 through 2000, this article assesses whether interdistrict variations in sentence outcomes exist and whether the factors that affect these outcomes vary across jurisdictions. It also attempts to determine whether disparities in sentence outcomes can be attributed to downward departures. The findings raise questions about the validity of the assumption of uniformity in the federal sentencing process and the use of aggregate data to study federal sentence outcomes.",
keywords = "Downward departures, Federal sentencing guidelines, Sentencing disparity",
author = "Jawjeong Wu and Cassia Spohn",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0011128707309997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "290--322",
journal = "Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0011-1287",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interdistrict disparity in sentencing in three U.S. District Courts

AU - Wu, Jawjeong

AU - Spohn, Cassia

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Research examining disparities in sentencing outcomes under federal sentencing guidelines has focused almost exclusively on aggregate national data. Although these studies contribute considerably to the criminological literature on sentencing disparity, their findings may have masked contextual variation in relation to case processing across jurisdictions. With data from the U.S. District Courts for Minnesota, Nebraska, and Southern Iowa for 1998 through 2000, this article assesses whether interdistrict variations in sentence outcomes exist and whether the factors that affect these outcomes vary across jurisdictions. It also attempts to determine whether disparities in sentence outcomes can be attributed to downward departures. The findings raise questions about the validity of the assumption of uniformity in the federal sentencing process and the use of aggregate data to study federal sentence outcomes.

AB - Research examining disparities in sentencing outcomes under federal sentencing guidelines has focused almost exclusively on aggregate national data. Although these studies contribute considerably to the criminological literature on sentencing disparity, their findings may have masked contextual variation in relation to case processing across jurisdictions. With data from the U.S. District Courts for Minnesota, Nebraska, and Southern Iowa for 1998 through 2000, this article assesses whether interdistrict variations in sentence outcomes exist and whether the factors that affect these outcomes vary across jurisdictions. It also attempts to determine whether disparities in sentence outcomes can be attributed to downward departures. The findings raise questions about the validity of the assumption of uniformity in the federal sentencing process and the use of aggregate data to study federal sentence outcomes.

KW - Downward departures

KW - Federal sentencing guidelines

KW - Sentencing disparity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649320498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649320498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0011128707309997

DO - 10.1177/0011128707309997

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77649320498

VL - 56

SP - 290

EP - 322

JO - Crime and Delinquency

JF - Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0011-1287

IS - 2

ER -