Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychological invasion of personality

Douglas Kenrick, Arthur Dantchik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present paper discusses three recent developments in the field of Personality: (1) an infusion of social psychologists, (2) a proliferation of interactionist models, (3) the development of methodological strategies combining nomothetic and idiographic approaches. Advantages and disadvantages of these developments are discussed, and three problems associated with them are addressed: (1) an overemphasis on phenomenology, (2) an overemphasis on idiosyncracy, and (3) an unsatisfactory level of theory development. It is concluded that the present developments have had a stimulating effect on the field but they need to be integrated with the traditional personological goals of: (1) developing taxonomy of individuals (as well as a taxonomy of interactions) and (2) developing a more satisfactory theory of the whole organism within which to embed our minitheories. We recommend that such a theory attempt to incorporate the insights of the social learning and social cognition approaches with the recent and exciting developments in evolutionary theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)286-307
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983

Fingerprint

Personality
Psychology
Cognition
Social Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychological invasion of personality. / Kenrick, Douglas; Dantchik, Arthur.

In: Journal of Personality, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1983, p. 286-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d7c4f0d95054b64945d38d17c5087e6,
title = "Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychological invasion of personality",
abstract = "The present paper discusses three recent developments in the field of Personality: (1) an infusion of social psychologists, (2) a proliferation of interactionist models, (3) the development of methodological strategies combining nomothetic and idiographic approaches. Advantages and disadvantages of these developments are discussed, and three problems associated with them are addressed: (1) an overemphasis on phenomenology, (2) an overemphasis on idiosyncracy, and (3) an unsatisfactory level of theory development. It is concluded that the present developments have had a stimulating effect on the field but they need to be integrated with the traditional personological goals of: (1) developing taxonomy of individuals (as well as a taxonomy of interactions) and (2) developing a more satisfactory theory of the whole organism within which to embed our minitheories. We recommend that such a theory attempt to incorporate the insights of the social learning and social cognition approaches with the recent and exciting developments in evolutionary theory.",
author = "Douglas Kenrick and Arthur Dantchik",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00335.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "286--307",
journal = "Journal of Personality",
issn = "0022-3506",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychological invasion of personality

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

AU - Dantchik, Arthur

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - The present paper discusses three recent developments in the field of Personality: (1) an infusion of social psychologists, (2) a proliferation of interactionist models, (3) the development of methodological strategies combining nomothetic and idiographic approaches. Advantages and disadvantages of these developments are discussed, and three problems associated with them are addressed: (1) an overemphasis on phenomenology, (2) an overemphasis on idiosyncracy, and (3) an unsatisfactory level of theory development. It is concluded that the present developments have had a stimulating effect on the field but they need to be integrated with the traditional personological goals of: (1) developing taxonomy of individuals (as well as a taxonomy of interactions) and (2) developing a more satisfactory theory of the whole organism within which to embed our minitheories. We recommend that such a theory attempt to incorporate the insights of the social learning and social cognition approaches with the recent and exciting developments in evolutionary theory.

AB - The present paper discusses three recent developments in the field of Personality: (1) an infusion of social psychologists, (2) a proliferation of interactionist models, (3) the development of methodological strategies combining nomothetic and idiographic approaches. Advantages and disadvantages of these developments are discussed, and three problems associated with them are addressed: (1) an overemphasis on phenomenology, (2) an overemphasis on idiosyncracy, and (3) an unsatisfactory level of theory development. It is concluded that the present developments have had a stimulating effect on the field but they need to be integrated with the traditional personological goals of: (1) developing taxonomy of individuals (as well as a taxonomy of interactions) and (2) developing a more satisfactory theory of the whole organism within which to embed our minitheories. We recommend that such a theory attempt to incorporate the insights of the social learning and social cognition approaches with the recent and exciting developments in evolutionary theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985180939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985180939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00335.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00335.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84985180939

VL - 51

SP - 286

EP - 307

JO - Journal of Personality

JF - Journal of Personality

SN - 0022-3506

IS - 3

ER -