Interaction rules and strategies in psychotherapy

James W. Lichtenberg, Terence Tracey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To examine the presence of interaction rules and strategies used in therapy, the verbal responses of therapists and clients in 26 actual psychotherapy cases were coded using the Interpersonal Communication Rating Scale (ICRS; S. R. Strong, H. Hills, C. Kilmartin, et al., 1988). The conditional response probabilities of these ICRS codes were examined from a rules and strategies perspective according to procedures suggested by S. Duncan (1983). The results supported the presence for rules for both the client and the therapist, and these rules were found to involve complementary interactions. No support was found for the presence of strategies in the interactive behavior of either participant. Finally, there was no relation between the presence of rules and session evaluation. The results are discussed with respect to the definition of rules in counseling and the concept of complementarity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-275
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Counseling Psychology
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2003

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Counseling
Communication
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Interaction rules and strategies in psychotherapy. / Lichtenberg, James W.; Tracey, Terence.

In: Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 3, 07.2003, p. 267-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lichtenberg, James W. ; Tracey, Terence. / Interaction rules and strategies in psychotherapy. In: Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2003 ; Vol. 50, No. 3. pp. 267-275.
@article{8eb2fdc2caac424ea93e934b7fefdec1,
title = "Interaction rules and strategies in psychotherapy",
abstract = "To examine the presence of interaction rules and strategies used in therapy, the verbal responses of therapists and clients in 26 actual psychotherapy cases were coded using the Interpersonal Communication Rating Scale (ICRS; S. R. Strong, H. Hills, C. Kilmartin, et al., 1988). The conditional response probabilities of these ICRS codes were examined from a rules and strategies perspective according to procedures suggested by S. Duncan (1983). The results supported the presence for rules for both the client and the therapist, and these rules were found to involve complementary interactions. No support was found for the presence of strategies in the interactive behavior of either participant. Finally, there was no relation between the presence of rules and session evaluation. The results are discussed with respect to the definition of rules in counseling and the concept of complementarity.",
author = "Lichtenberg, {James W.} and Terence Tracey",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/0022-0167.50.3.267",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "267--275",
journal = "Journal of Counseling Psychology",
issn = "0022-0167",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interaction rules and strategies in psychotherapy

AU - Lichtenberg, James W.

AU - Tracey, Terence

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - To examine the presence of interaction rules and strategies used in therapy, the verbal responses of therapists and clients in 26 actual psychotherapy cases were coded using the Interpersonal Communication Rating Scale (ICRS; S. R. Strong, H. Hills, C. Kilmartin, et al., 1988). The conditional response probabilities of these ICRS codes were examined from a rules and strategies perspective according to procedures suggested by S. Duncan (1983). The results supported the presence for rules for both the client and the therapist, and these rules were found to involve complementary interactions. No support was found for the presence of strategies in the interactive behavior of either participant. Finally, there was no relation between the presence of rules and session evaluation. The results are discussed with respect to the definition of rules in counseling and the concept of complementarity.

AB - To examine the presence of interaction rules and strategies used in therapy, the verbal responses of therapists and clients in 26 actual psychotherapy cases were coded using the Interpersonal Communication Rating Scale (ICRS; S. R. Strong, H. Hills, C. Kilmartin, et al., 1988). The conditional response probabilities of these ICRS codes were examined from a rules and strategies perspective according to procedures suggested by S. Duncan (1983). The results supported the presence for rules for both the client and the therapist, and these rules were found to involve complementary interactions. No support was found for the presence of strategies in the interactive behavior of either participant. Finally, there was no relation between the presence of rules and session evaluation. The results are discussed with respect to the definition of rules in counseling and the concept of complementarity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041386140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041386140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-0167.50.3.267

DO - 10.1037/0022-0167.50.3.267

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 267

EP - 275

JO - Journal of Counseling Psychology

JF - Journal of Counseling Psychology

SN - 0022-0167

IS - 3

ER -