Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman

Leslie P. Steffe, Patrick Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lerman, in his challenge to radical constructivism, presented Vygotsky as an irreconcilable opponent to Piaget's genetic epistemology and thus to von Glasersfeld's radical constructivism. We argue that Lerman's stance does not reflect von Glasersfeld's opinion of Vygotsky's work, nor does it reflect Vygotsky's opinion of Piaget's work. We question Lerman's interpretation of radical constructivism and explain how the ideas of interaction, intersubjectivity, and social goals make sense in it. We then establish compatibility between the analytic units in Vygotsky's and von Glasersfeld's models and contrast them with Lerman's analytic unit. Consequently, we question Lerman's interpretation of Vygotsky. Finally, we question Lerman's use of Vygotsky's work in mathematics education, and we contrast that use with how we use von Glasersfeld's radical constructivism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-209
Number of pages19
JournalJournal for Research in Mathematics Education
Volume31
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Constructivism
intersubjectivity
constructivism
interaction
Interaction
Epistemology
interpretation
Unit
Mathematics Education
epistemology
Compatibility
mathematics
education
Interpretation

Keywords

  • Constructivism
  • Epistemology
  • Philosophical issues
  • Piaget
  • Social and cultural issues
  • Vygotsky

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman. / Steffe, Leslie P.; Thompson, Patrick.

In: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2000, p. 191-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2de55c52ff60439e9ffddf2ffe929961,
title = "Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman",
abstract = "Lerman, in his challenge to radical constructivism, presented Vygotsky as an irreconcilable opponent to Piaget's genetic epistemology and thus to von Glasersfeld's radical constructivism. We argue that Lerman's stance does not reflect von Glasersfeld's opinion of Vygotsky's work, nor does it reflect Vygotsky's opinion of Piaget's work. We question Lerman's interpretation of radical constructivism and explain how the ideas of interaction, intersubjectivity, and social goals make sense in it. We then establish compatibility between the analytic units in Vygotsky's and von Glasersfeld's models and contrast them with Lerman's analytic unit. Consequently, we question Lerman's interpretation of Vygotsky. Finally, we question Lerman's use of Vygotsky's work in mathematics education, and we contrast that use with how we use von Glasersfeld's radical constructivism.",
keywords = "Constructivism, Epistemology, Philosophical issues, Piaget, Social and cultural issues, Vygotsky",
author = "Steffe, {Leslie P.} and Patrick Thompson",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "191--209",
journal = "Journal for Research in Mathematics Education",
issn = "0021-8251",
publisher = "National Council of Teachers of Mathematics",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman

AU - Steffe, Leslie P.

AU - Thompson, Patrick

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Lerman, in his challenge to radical constructivism, presented Vygotsky as an irreconcilable opponent to Piaget's genetic epistemology and thus to von Glasersfeld's radical constructivism. We argue that Lerman's stance does not reflect von Glasersfeld's opinion of Vygotsky's work, nor does it reflect Vygotsky's opinion of Piaget's work. We question Lerman's interpretation of radical constructivism and explain how the ideas of interaction, intersubjectivity, and social goals make sense in it. We then establish compatibility between the analytic units in Vygotsky's and von Glasersfeld's models and contrast them with Lerman's analytic unit. Consequently, we question Lerman's interpretation of Vygotsky. Finally, we question Lerman's use of Vygotsky's work in mathematics education, and we contrast that use with how we use von Glasersfeld's radical constructivism.

AB - Lerman, in his challenge to radical constructivism, presented Vygotsky as an irreconcilable opponent to Piaget's genetic epistemology and thus to von Glasersfeld's radical constructivism. We argue that Lerman's stance does not reflect von Glasersfeld's opinion of Vygotsky's work, nor does it reflect Vygotsky's opinion of Piaget's work. We question Lerman's interpretation of radical constructivism and explain how the ideas of interaction, intersubjectivity, and social goals make sense in it. We then establish compatibility between the analytic units in Vygotsky's and von Glasersfeld's models and contrast them with Lerman's analytic unit. Consequently, we question Lerman's interpretation of Vygotsky. Finally, we question Lerman's use of Vygotsky's work in mathematics education, and we contrast that use with how we use von Glasersfeld's radical constructivism.

KW - Constructivism

KW - Epistemology

KW - Philosophical issues

KW - Piaget

KW - Social and cultural issues

KW - Vygotsky

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22844454265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22844454265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:22844454265

VL - 31

SP - 191

EP - 209

JO - Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

JF - Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

SN - 0021-8251

IS - 2

ER -