Interaction location outweighs the competitive advantage of numerical superiority in Cebus capucinus intergroup contests

Margaret C. Crofoot, Ian Gilby, Martin C. Wikelski, Roland W. Kays

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerical superiority confers a competitive advantage during contests among animal groups, shaping patterns of resource access, and, by extension, fitness. However, relative group size does not always determine the winner of intergroup contests. Smaller, presumably weaker social groups often defeat their larger neighbors, but how and when they are able to do so remains poorly understood. Models of competition between individuals suggest that location may influence contest outcome. However, because of the logistical difficulties of studying intergroup interactions, previous studies have been unable to determine how contest location and group size interact to shape relationships among groups. We address this question by using an automated radio telemetry system to study intergroup interactions among six capuchin monkey (Cebus capucinus) social groups of varying sizes. We find that the odds of winning increase with relative group size; one additional group member increases the odds of winning an interaction by 10%. However, this effect is not uniform across space; with each 100 m that a group moves away from the center of its home range, its odds of winning an interaction decrease by 31%. We demonstrate that contest outcome depends on an interaction between group size and location, such that small groups can defeat much larger groups near the center of their home range. The tendency of resident groups to win contests may help explain how small groups persist in areas with intense intergroup competition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)577-581
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume105
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Homing Behavior
Cebus
Telemetry
Radio

Keywords

  • Between-group competition
  • Intergroup dominance
  • Payoff asymmetries
  • Resource holding potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • General

Cite this

Interaction location outweighs the competitive advantage of numerical superiority in Cebus capucinus intergroup contests. / Crofoot, Margaret C.; Gilby, Ian; Wikelski, Martin C.; Kays, Roland W.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 105, No. 2, 15.01.2008, p. 577-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92832c65c759419b929a7b2db9ddacbd,
title = "Interaction location outweighs the competitive advantage of numerical superiority in Cebus capucinus intergroup contests",
abstract = "Numerical superiority confers a competitive advantage during contests among animal groups, shaping patterns of resource access, and, by extension, fitness. However, relative group size does not always determine the winner of intergroup contests. Smaller, presumably weaker social groups often defeat their larger neighbors, but how and when they are able to do so remains poorly understood. Models of competition between individuals suggest that location may influence contest outcome. However, because of the logistical difficulties of studying intergroup interactions, previous studies have been unable to determine how contest location and group size interact to shape relationships among groups. We address this question by using an automated radio telemetry system to study intergroup interactions among six capuchin monkey (Cebus capucinus) social groups of varying sizes. We find that the odds of winning increase with relative group size; one additional group member increases the odds of winning an interaction by 10{\%}. However, this effect is not uniform across space; with each 100 m that a group moves away from the center of its home range, its odds of winning an interaction decrease by 31{\%}. We demonstrate that contest outcome depends on an interaction between group size and location, such that small groups can defeat much larger groups near the center of their home range. The tendency of resident groups to win contests may help explain how small groups persist in areas with intense intergroup competition.",
keywords = "Between-group competition, Intergroup dominance, Payoff asymmetries, Resource holding potential",
author = "Crofoot, {Margaret C.} and Ian Gilby and Wikelski, {Martin C.} and Kays, {Roland W.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.0707749105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "577--581",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interaction location outweighs the competitive advantage of numerical superiority in Cebus capucinus intergroup contests

AU - Crofoot, Margaret C.

AU - Gilby, Ian

AU - Wikelski, Martin C.

AU - Kays, Roland W.

PY - 2008/1/15

Y1 - 2008/1/15

N2 - Numerical superiority confers a competitive advantage during contests among animal groups, shaping patterns of resource access, and, by extension, fitness. However, relative group size does not always determine the winner of intergroup contests. Smaller, presumably weaker social groups often defeat their larger neighbors, but how and when they are able to do so remains poorly understood. Models of competition between individuals suggest that location may influence contest outcome. However, because of the logistical difficulties of studying intergroup interactions, previous studies have been unable to determine how contest location and group size interact to shape relationships among groups. We address this question by using an automated radio telemetry system to study intergroup interactions among six capuchin monkey (Cebus capucinus) social groups of varying sizes. We find that the odds of winning increase with relative group size; one additional group member increases the odds of winning an interaction by 10%. However, this effect is not uniform across space; with each 100 m that a group moves away from the center of its home range, its odds of winning an interaction decrease by 31%. We demonstrate that contest outcome depends on an interaction between group size and location, such that small groups can defeat much larger groups near the center of their home range. The tendency of resident groups to win contests may help explain how small groups persist in areas with intense intergroup competition.

AB - Numerical superiority confers a competitive advantage during contests among animal groups, shaping patterns of resource access, and, by extension, fitness. However, relative group size does not always determine the winner of intergroup contests. Smaller, presumably weaker social groups often defeat their larger neighbors, but how and when they are able to do so remains poorly understood. Models of competition between individuals suggest that location may influence contest outcome. However, because of the logistical difficulties of studying intergroup interactions, previous studies have been unable to determine how contest location and group size interact to shape relationships among groups. We address this question by using an automated radio telemetry system to study intergroup interactions among six capuchin monkey (Cebus capucinus) social groups of varying sizes. We find that the odds of winning increase with relative group size; one additional group member increases the odds of winning an interaction by 10%. However, this effect is not uniform across space; with each 100 m that a group moves away from the center of its home range, its odds of winning an interaction decrease by 31%. We demonstrate that contest outcome depends on an interaction between group size and location, such that small groups can defeat much larger groups near the center of their home range. The tendency of resident groups to win contests may help explain how small groups persist in areas with intense intergroup competition.

KW - Between-group competition

KW - Intergroup dominance

KW - Payoff asymmetries

KW - Resource holding potential

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38649084393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38649084393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.0707749105

DO - 10.1073/pnas.0707749105

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 577

EP - 581

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 2

ER -