Integrative medicine therapeutic approaches to cancer care: patient preferences from focus groups

Wonsun Kim, Dara James, Denise M. Millstine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To understand patient preferences for integrative therapeutics and/or modalities during cancer care. Methods: Cancer patients currently going through treatment were recruited from the Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Participants were asked to engage in 1 of 4 focus groups to understand preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities in cancer treatment. Focus group data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Eighty-five percent of inter-coder reliability was achieved with four team investigators. Results: Nineteen cancer patients participated in four focus groups with mixed cancer types (42% breast cancer), gender (53% female), and age (69% over age 60). Focus group analyses resulted in five themes with respect to preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities among cancer patients: (1) preference regarding accurate and congruent information; (2) preference regarding stress and symptom management; (3) preference regarding discussion of integrative therapies with healthcare providers (4) preference regarding support from family and friends; and (5) preference regarding personalized holistic care. Conclusions: Patients have a desire to discuss integrative therapeutic aspects of their cancer treatment with healthcare providers. Understanding patient preferences allows opportunity for oncology providers to increase awareness/education of integrative therapeutic modalities. Increased integrative therapeutic knowledge may best support recovery and increased quality of life. Implications: Qualitative research may facilitate understanding the scope of cancer patient preferences regarding the desire and use of integrative therapeutic modalities. A conceptual understanding of cancer patient preferences regarding integrative therapies and modalities may best inform successful direction and efficacy of treatment strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Integrative Medicine
Patient Preference
Focus Groups
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Health Personnel
Breast Neoplasms
Qualitative Research
Therapeutic Uses

Keywords

  • Focus group
  • Integrative therapies
  • Oncology
  • Patient preference
  • Qualitative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this

Integrative medicine therapeutic approaches to cancer care : patient preferences from focus groups. / Kim, Wonsun; James, Dara; Millstine, Denise M.

In: Supportive Care in Cancer, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13c822c3317c42e5b20d104c1666b3cd,
title = "Integrative medicine therapeutic approaches to cancer care: patient preferences from focus groups",
abstract = "Purpose: To understand patient preferences for integrative therapeutics and/or modalities during cancer care. Methods: Cancer patients currently going through treatment were recruited from the Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Participants were asked to engage in 1 of 4 focus groups to understand preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities in cancer treatment. Focus group data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Eighty-five percent of inter-coder reliability was achieved with four team investigators. Results: Nineteen cancer patients participated in four focus groups with mixed cancer types (42{\%} breast cancer), gender (53{\%} female), and age (69{\%} over age 60). Focus group analyses resulted in five themes with respect to preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities among cancer patients: (1) preference regarding accurate and congruent information; (2) preference regarding stress and symptom management; (3) preference regarding discussion of integrative therapies with healthcare providers (4) preference regarding support from family and friends; and (5) preference regarding personalized holistic care. Conclusions: Patients have a desire to discuss integrative therapeutic aspects of their cancer treatment with healthcare providers. Understanding patient preferences allows opportunity for oncology providers to increase awareness/education of integrative therapeutic modalities. Increased integrative therapeutic knowledge may best support recovery and increased quality of life. Implications: Qualitative research may facilitate understanding the scope of cancer patient preferences regarding the desire and use of integrative therapeutic modalities. A conceptual understanding of cancer patient preferences regarding integrative therapies and modalities may best inform successful direction and efficacy of treatment strategies.",
keywords = "Focus group, Integrative therapies, Oncology, Patient preference, Qualitative",
author = "Wonsun Kim and Dara James and Millstine, {Denise M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-018-4601-7",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrative medicine therapeutic approaches to cancer care

T2 - patient preferences from focus groups

AU - Kim, Wonsun

AU - James, Dara

AU - Millstine, Denise M.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To understand patient preferences for integrative therapeutics and/or modalities during cancer care. Methods: Cancer patients currently going through treatment were recruited from the Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Participants were asked to engage in 1 of 4 focus groups to understand preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities in cancer treatment. Focus group data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Eighty-five percent of inter-coder reliability was achieved with four team investigators. Results: Nineteen cancer patients participated in four focus groups with mixed cancer types (42% breast cancer), gender (53% female), and age (69% over age 60). Focus group analyses resulted in five themes with respect to preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities among cancer patients: (1) preference regarding accurate and congruent information; (2) preference regarding stress and symptom management; (3) preference regarding discussion of integrative therapies with healthcare providers (4) preference regarding support from family and friends; and (5) preference regarding personalized holistic care. Conclusions: Patients have a desire to discuss integrative therapeutic aspects of their cancer treatment with healthcare providers. Understanding patient preferences allows opportunity for oncology providers to increase awareness/education of integrative therapeutic modalities. Increased integrative therapeutic knowledge may best support recovery and increased quality of life. Implications: Qualitative research may facilitate understanding the scope of cancer patient preferences regarding the desire and use of integrative therapeutic modalities. A conceptual understanding of cancer patient preferences regarding integrative therapies and modalities may best inform successful direction and efficacy of treatment strategies.

AB - Purpose: To understand patient preferences for integrative therapeutics and/or modalities during cancer care. Methods: Cancer patients currently going through treatment were recruited from the Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Participants were asked to engage in 1 of 4 focus groups to understand preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities in cancer treatment. Focus group data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Eighty-five percent of inter-coder reliability was achieved with four team investigators. Results: Nineteen cancer patients participated in four focus groups with mixed cancer types (42% breast cancer), gender (53% female), and age (69% over age 60). Focus group analyses resulted in five themes with respect to preferences regarding integrative therapeutic modalities among cancer patients: (1) preference regarding accurate and congruent information; (2) preference regarding stress and symptom management; (3) preference regarding discussion of integrative therapies with healthcare providers (4) preference regarding support from family and friends; and (5) preference regarding personalized holistic care. Conclusions: Patients have a desire to discuss integrative therapeutic aspects of their cancer treatment with healthcare providers. Understanding patient preferences allows opportunity for oncology providers to increase awareness/education of integrative therapeutic modalities. Increased integrative therapeutic knowledge may best support recovery and increased quality of life. Implications: Qualitative research may facilitate understanding the scope of cancer patient preferences regarding the desire and use of integrative therapeutic modalities. A conceptual understanding of cancer patient preferences regarding integrative therapies and modalities may best inform successful direction and efficacy of treatment strategies.

KW - Focus group

KW - Integrative therapies

KW - Oncology

KW - Patient preference

KW - Qualitative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058931291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058931291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-018-4601-7

DO - 10.1007/s00520-018-4601-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 30569264

AN - SCOPUS:85058931291

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 0941-4355

ER -