INTEGRATION OR DISINTEGRATION? AN EXAMINATION OF THE CORE ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Nancy M. Dodge, Carlton J. Whitehead, Brian Gerber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The attacks of September 11th transformed homeland security into a central policy task for governments in the U.S., culminating in the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Planning and preparation for counter terrorism were no longer secondary priorities. This article seeks to examine some of the salient organizational and management issues that could potentially facilitate or impair DHS's successful integration of its varied 22 agencies, and its subsequent execution of its critical tasks associated with countering terrorism and bioterrorism. Characterizing this change as a type of punctuated equilibrium, this article closes by suggesting that a differentiated network structure offers a potentially powerful mechanism by which the DHS could proactively and effectively address many of these leadership, management and organizational challenges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-366
Number of pages22
JournalAdvances in Health Care Management
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terrorism
Bioterrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

INTEGRATION OR DISINTEGRATION? AN EXAMINATION OF THE CORE ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. / Dodge, Nancy M.; Whitehead, Carlton J.; Gerber, Brian.

In: Advances in Health Care Management, Vol. 4, 2004, p. 345-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac60721e04e04c38831be37e4595be84,
title = "INTEGRATION OR DISINTEGRATION? AN EXAMINATION OF THE CORE ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY",
abstract = "The attacks of September 11th transformed homeland security into a central policy task for governments in the U.S., culminating in the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Planning and preparation for counter terrorism were no longer secondary priorities. This article seeks to examine some of the salient organizational and management issues that could potentially facilitate or impair DHS's successful integration of its varied 22 agencies, and its subsequent execution of its critical tasks associated with countering terrorism and bioterrorism. Characterizing this change as a type of punctuated equilibrium, this article closes by suggesting that a differentiated network structure offers a potentially powerful mechanism by which the DHS could proactively and effectively address many of these leadership, management and organizational challenges.",
author = "Dodge, {Nancy M.} and Whitehead, {Carlton J.} and Brian Gerber",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1016/S1474-8231(04)04014-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "345--366",
journal = "Advances in Health Care Management",
issn = "1474-8231",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - INTEGRATION OR DISINTEGRATION? AN EXAMINATION OF THE CORE ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

AU - Dodge, Nancy M.

AU - Whitehead, Carlton J.

AU - Gerber, Brian

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The attacks of September 11th transformed homeland security into a central policy task for governments in the U.S., culminating in the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Planning and preparation for counter terrorism were no longer secondary priorities. This article seeks to examine some of the salient organizational and management issues that could potentially facilitate or impair DHS's successful integration of its varied 22 agencies, and its subsequent execution of its critical tasks associated with countering terrorism and bioterrorism. Characterizing this change as a type of punctuated equilibrium, this article closes by suggesting that a differentiated network structure offers a potentially powerful mechanism by which the DHS could proactively and effectively address many of these leadership, management and organizational challenges.

AB - The attacks of September 11th transformed homeland security into a central policy task for governments in the U.S., culminating in the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Planning and preparation for counter terrorism were no longer secondary priorities. This article seeks to examine some of the salient organizational and management issues that could potentially facilitate or impair DHS's successful integration of its varied 22 agencies, and its subsequent execution of its critical tasks associated with countering terrorism and bioterrorism. Characterizing this change as a type of punctuated equilibrium, this article closes by suggesting that a differentiated network structure offers a potentially powerful mechanism by which the DHS could proactively and effectively address many of these leadership, management and organizational challenges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36148932197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36148932197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1474-8231(04)04014-5

DO - 10.1016/S1474-8231(04)04014-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36148932197

VL - 4

SP - 345

EP - 366

JO - Advances in Health Care Management

JF - Advances in Health Care Management

SN - 1474-8231

ER -