Integrating science and society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in project-level solicitations

Hannot Rodríguez, Erik Fisher, Daan Schuurbiers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As part of a larger trend across industrialized nations, European research policy discourse has placed increasing emphasis on socio-technical integration: the explicit incorporation of activities devoted to broader social aspects into scientific activities. In order to compare these high-level integration discourses against patterns at the level of resource allocation, we analyze nearly 2500 research solicitations from the three European Framework Programmes for R&D during the period 1998-2010. We identify four distinct types of integration (socio-ethical, stakeholder, socio-economic and industrial) that occur either as core or parallel components of R&D solicitations. Quantitative analysis reveals an overall trend towards increasing integration, with requests integrating industrial and socio-economic aspects substantially outnumbering those integrating socio-ethical and stakeholder aspects - by a 2 to 1 margin. Meanwhile, calls for socio-technical integration have become slightly more extensive (ranging across a broader range of research areas addressed), significantly more pervasive (shifting from the periphery to the core of R&D practices), and arguably less diverse (involving a wider variety of integration types) over time. The relative lack of attention to socio-ethical aspects and stakeholder participation in European research is particularly notable given that we focus on potentially controversial areas (life sciences, energy, and nanotechnology), which likely overemphasizes the prevalence of integration throughout the Framework Programmes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1126-1137
Number of pages12
JournalResearch Policy
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Social aspects
Economics
Nanotechnology
Resource allocation
Chemical analysis
Socio-economics
Discourse
Stakeholders
Life sciences
Stakeholder participation
Quantitative analysis
Energy
Margin
Research policy
Industrial economics

Keywords

  • ELSA (Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects)
  • EU Framework Programmes
  • Research solicitations
  • Responsible innovation
  • Socio-technical integration
  • Stakeholder engagement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Integrating science and society in European Framework Programmes : Trends in project-level solicitations. / Rodríguez, Hannot; Fisher, Erik; Schuurbiers, Daan.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 42, No. 5, 06.2013, p. 1126-1137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2cf1b4f160f48dda149ccc3dbe11eac,
title = "Integrating science and society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in project-level solicitations",
abstract = "As part of a larger trend across industrialized nations, European research policy discourse has placed increasing emphasis on socio-technical integration: the explicit incorporation of activities devoted to broader social aspects into scientific activities. In order to compare these high-level integration discourses against patterns at the level of resource allocation, we analyze nearly 2500 research solicitations from the three European Framework Programmes for R&D during the period 1998-2010. We identify four distinct types of integration (socio-ethical, stakeholder, socio-economic and industrial) that occur either as core or parallel components of R&D solicitations. Quantitative analysis reveals an overall trend towards increasing integration, with requests integrating industrial and socio-economic aspects substantially outnumbering those integrating socio-ethical and stakeholder aspects - by a 2 to 1 margin. Meanwhile, calls for socio-technical integration have become slightly more extensive (ranging across a broader range of research areas addressed), significantly more pervasive (shifting from the periphery to the core of R&D practices), and arguably less diverse (involving a wider variety of integration types) over time. The relative lack of attention to socio-ethical aspects and stakeholder participation in European research is particularly notable given that we focus on potentially controversial areas (life sciences, energy, and nanotechnology), which likely overemphasizes the prevalence of integration throughout the Framework Programmes.",
keywords = "ELSA (Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects), EU Framework Programmes, Research solicitations, Responsible innovation, Socio-technical integration, Stakeholder engagement",
author = "Hannot Rodr{\'i}guez and Erik Fisher and Daan Schuurbiers",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1126--1137",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating science and society in European Framework Programmes

T2 - Trends in project-level solicitations

AU - Rodríguez, Hannot

AU - Fisher, Erik

AU - Schuurbiers, Daan

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - As part of a larger trend across industrialized nations, European research policy discourse has placed increasing emphasis on socio-technical integration: the explicit incorporation of activities devoted to broader social aspects into scientific activities. In order to compare these high-level integration discourses against patterns at the level of resource allocation, we analyze nearly 2500 research solicitations from the three European Framework Programmes for R&D during the period 1998-2010. We identify four distinct types of integration (socio-ethical, stakeholder, socio-economic and industrial) that occur either as core or parallel components of R&D solicitations. Quantitative analysis reveals an overall trend towards increasing integration, with requests integrating industrial and socio-economic aspects substantially outnumbering those integrating socio-ethical and stakeholder aspects - by a 2 to 1 margin. Meanwhile, calls for socio-technical integration have become slightly more extensive (ranging across a broader range of research areas addressed), significantly more pervasive (shifting from the periphery to the core of R&D practices), and arguably less diverse (involving a wider variety of integration types) over time. The relative lack of attention to socio-ethical aspects and stakeholder participation in European research is particularly notable given that we focus on potentially controversial areas (life sciences, energy, and nanotechnology), which likely overemphasizes the prevalence of integration throughout the Framework Programmes.

AB - As part of a larger trend across industrialized nations, European research policy discourse has placed increasing emphasis on socio-technical integration: the explicit incorporation of activities devoted to broader social aspects into scientific activities. In order to compare these high-level integration discourses against patterns at the level of resource allocation, we analyze nearly 2500 research solicitations from the three European Framework Programmes for R&D during the period 1998-2010. We identify four distinct types of integration (socio-ethical, stakeholder, socio-economic and industrial) that occur either as core or parallel components of R&D solicitations. Quantitative analysis reveals an overall trend towards increasing integration, with requests integrating industrial and socio-economic aspects substantially outnumbering those integrating socio-ethical and stakeholder aspects - by a 2 to 1 margin. Meanwhile, calls for socio-technical integration have become slightly more extensive (ranging across a broader range of research areas addressed), significantly more pervasive (shifting from the periphery to the core of R&D practices), and arguably less diverse (involving a wider variety of integration types) over time. The relative lack of attention to socio-ethical aspects and stakeholder participation in European research is particularly notable given that we focus on potentially controversial areas (life sciences, energy, and nanotechnology), which likely overemphasizes the prevalence of integration throughout the Framework Programmes.

KW - ELSA (Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects)

KW - EU Framework Programmes

KW - Research solicitations

KW - Responsible innovation

KW - Socio-technical integration

KW - Stakeholder engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876861435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876861435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84876861435

VL - 42

SP - 1126

EP - 1137

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 5

ER -