Integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring: Hurdles, achievements, and future outlook

Graham Van Aggelen, Gerald T. Ankley, William S. Baldwin, Daniel W. Bearden, William H. Benson, J. Kevin Chipman, Tim W. Collette, John A. Craft, Nancy D. Denslow, Michael R. Embry, Francesco Falciani, Stephen G. George, Caren C. Helbing, Paul F. Hoekstra, Taisen Iguchi, Yoshi Kagami, Ioanna Katsiadaki, Peter Kille, Li Liu, Peter G. LordTerry McIntyre, Anne O'Neill, Heather Osachoff, Ed J. Perkins, Eduarda M. Santos, Rachel C. Skirrow, Jason R. Snape, Charles R. Tyler, Don Versteeg, Mark R. Viant, David C. Volz, Tim D. Williams, Lorraine Yu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In this commentary we present the findings from an international consortium on fish toxicogenomics sponsored by the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (Fish Toxicogenomics-Moving into Regulation and Monitoring, held 21-23 April 2008 at the Pacific Environmental Science Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Objectives: The consortium from government agencies, academia, and industry addressed three topics: progress in ecotoxicogenomics, regulatory perspectives on roadblocks for practical implementation of toxicogenomics into risk assessment, and dealing with variability in data sets. Discussion: Participants noted that examples of successful application of omic technologies have been identified, but critical studies are needed to relate molecular changes to ecological adverse outcome. Participants made recommendations for the management of technical and biological variation. They also stressed the need for enhanced interdisciplinary training and communication as well as considerable investment into the generation and curation of appropriate reference omic data. Conclusions: The participants concluded that, although there are hurdles to pass on the road to regulatory acceptance, omics technologies are already useful for elucidating modes of action of toxicants and can contribute to the risk assessment process as part of a weight-of-evidence approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume118
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Toxicogenetics
Environmental Monitoring
Technology
Fishes
Interdisciplinary Communication
Government Agencies
Ecology
Canada
Industry
Weights and Measures
Research

Keywords

  • Environment
  • Environmental monitoring
  • Fish
  • Metabolomics
  • Microarray
  • Regulatory toxicology
  • Transcriptomics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring : Hurdles, achievements, and future outlook. / Van Aggelen, Graham; Ankley, Gerald T.; Baldwin, William S.; Bearden, Daniel W.; Benson, William H.; Chipman, J. Kevin; Collette, Tim W.; Craft, John A.; Denslow, Nancy D.; Embry, Michael R.; Falciani, Francesco; George, Stephen G.; Helbing, Caren C.; Hoekstra, Paul F.; Iguchi, Taisen; Kagami, Yoshi; Katsiadaki, Ioanna; Kille, Peter; Liu, Li; Lord, Peter G.; McIntyre, Terry; O'Neill, Anne; Osachoff, Heather; Perkins, Ed J.; Santos, Eduarda M.; Skirrow, Rachel C.; Snape, Jason R.; Tyler, Charles R.; Versteeg, Don; Viant, Mark R.; Volz, David C.; Williams, Tim D.; Yu, Lorraine.

In: Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 118, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 1-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Aggelen, G, Ankley, GT, Baldwin, WS, Bearden, DW, Benson, WH, Chipman, JK, Collette, TW, Craft, JA, Denslow, ND, Embry, MR, Falciani, F, George, SG, Helbing, CC, Hoekstra, PF, Iguchi, T, Kagami, Y, Katsiadaki, I, Kille, P, Liu, L, Lord, PG, McIntyre, T, O'Neill, A, Osachoff, H, Perkins, EJ, Santos, EM, Skirrow, RC, Snape, JR, Tyler, CR, Versteeg, D, Viant, MR, Volz, DC, Williams, TD & Yu, L 2010, 'Integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring: Hurdles, achievements, and future outlook', Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900985
Van Aggelen, Graham ; Ankley, Gerald T. ; Baldwin, William S. ; Bearden, Daniel W. ; Benson, William H. ; Chipman, J. Kevin ; Collette, Tim W. ; Craft, John A. ; Denslow, Nancy D. ; Embry, Michael R. ; Falciani, Francesco ; George, Stephen G. ; Helbing, Caren C. ; Hoekstra, Paul F. ; Iguchi, Taisen ; Kagami, Yoshi ; Katsiadaki, Ioanna ; Kille, Peter ; Liu, Li ; Lord, Peter G. ; McIntyre, Terry ; O'Neill, Anne ; Osachoff, Heather ; Perkins, Ed J. ; Santos, Eduarda M. ; Skirrow, Rachel C. ; Snape, Jason R. ; Tyler, Charles R. ; Versteeg, Don ; Viant, Mark R. ; Volz, David C. ; Williams, Tim D. ; Yu, Lorraine. / Integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring : Hurdles, achievements, and future outlook. In: Environmental Health Perspectives. 2010 ; Vol. 118, No. 1. pp. 1-5.
@article{3fb7551a190e4c3887bf22767f5f55b2,
title = "Integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring: Hurdles, achievements, and future outlook",
abstract = "Background: In this commentary we present the findings from an international consortium on fish toxicogenomics sponsored by the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (Fish Toxicogenomics-Moving into Regulation and Monitoring, held 21-23 April 2008 at the Pacific Environmental Science Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Objectives: The consortium from government agencies, academia, and industry addressed three topics: progress in ecotoxicogenomics, regulatory perspectives on roadblocks for practical implementation of toxicogenomics into risk assessment, and dealing with variability in data sets. Discussion: Participants noted that examples of successful application of omic technologies have been identified, but critical studies are needed to relate molecular changes to ecological adverse outcome. Participants made recommendations for the management of technical and biological variation. They also stressed the need for enhanced interdisciplinary training and communication as well as considerable investment into the generation and curation of appropriate reference omic data. Conclusions: The participants concluded that, although there are hurdles to pass on the road to regulatory acceptance, omics technologies are already useful for elucidating modes of action of toxicants and can contribute to the risk assessment process as part of a weight-of-evidence approach.",
keywords = "Environment, Environmental monitoring, Fish, Metabolomics, Microarray, Regulatory toxicology, Transcriptomics",
author = "{Van Aggelen}, Graham and Ankley, {Gerald T.} and Baldwin, {William S.} and Bearden, {Daniel W.} and Benson, {William H.} and Chipman, {J. Kevin} and Collette, {Tim W.} and Craft, {John A.} and Denslow, {Nancy D.} and Embry, {Michael R.} and Francesco Falciani and George, {Stephen G.} and Helbing, {Caren C.} and Hoekstra, {Paul F.} and Taisen Iguchi and Yoshi Kagami and Ioanna Katsiadaki and Peter Kille and Li Liu and Lord, {Peter G.} and Terry McIntyre and Anne O'Neill and Heather Osachoff and Perkins, {Ed J.} and Santos, {Eduarda M.} and Skirrow, {Rachel C.} and Snape, {Jason R.} and Tyler, {Charles R.} and Don Versteeg and Viant, {Mark R.} and Volz, {David C.} and Williams, {Tim D.} and Lorraine Yu",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1289/ehp.0900985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Environmental Health Perspectives",
issn = "0091-6765",
publisher = "Public Health Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring

T2 - Hurdles, achievements, and future outlook

AU - Van Aggelen, Graham

AU - Ankley, Gerald T.

AU - Baldwin, William S.

AU - Bearden, Daniel W.

AU - Benson, William H.

AU - Chipman, J. Kevin

AU - Collette, Tim W.

AU - Craft, John A.

AU - Denslow, Nancy D.

AU - Embry, Michael R.

AU - Falciani, Francesco

AU - George, Stephen G.

AU - Helbing, Caren C.

AU - Hoekstra, Paul F.

AU - Iguchi, Taisen

AU - Kagami, Yoshi

AU - Katsiadaki, Ioanna

AU - Kille, Peter

AU - Liu, Li

AU - Lord, Peter G.

AU - McIntyre, Terry

AU - O'Neill, Anne

AU - Osachoff, Heather

AU - Perkins, Ed J.

AU - Santos, Eduarda M.

AU - Skirrow, Rachel C.

AU - Snape, Jason R.

AU - Tyler, Charles R.

AU - Versteeg, Don

AU - Viant, Mark R.

AU - Volz, David C.

AU - Williams, Tim D.

AU - Yu, Lorraine

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Background: In this commentary we present the findings from an international consortium on fish toxicogenomics sponsored by the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (Fish Toxicogenomics-Moving into Regulation and Monitoring, held 21-23 April 2008 at the Pacific Environmental Science Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Objectives: The consortium from government agencies, academia, and industry addressed three topics: progress in ecotoxicogenomics, regulatory perspectives on roadblocks for practical implementation of toxicogenomics into risk assessment, and dealing with variability in data sets. Discussion: Participants noted that examples of successful application of omic technologies have been identified, but critical studies are needed to relate molecular changes to ecological adverse outcome. Participants made recommendations for the management of technical and biological variation. They also stressed the need for enhanced interdisciplinary training and communication as well as considerable investment into the generation and curation of appropriate reference omic data. Conclusions: The participants concluded that, although there are hurdles to pass on the road to regulatory acceptance, omics technologies are already useful for elucidating modes of action of toxicants and can contribute to the risk assessment process as part of a weight-of-evidence approach.

AB - Background: In this commentary we present the findings from an international consortium on fish toxicogenomics sponsored by the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (Fish Toxicogenomics-Moving into Regulation and Monitoring, held 21-23 April 2008 at the Pacific Environmental Science Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Objectives: The consortium from government agencies, academia, and industry addressed three topics: progress in ecotoxicogenomics, regulatory perspectives on roadblocks for practical implementation of toxicogenomics into risk assessment, and dealing with variability in data sets. Discussion: Participants noted that examples of successful application of omic technologies have been identified, but critical studies are needed to relate molecular changes to ecological adverse outcome. Participants made recommendations for the management of technical and biological variation. They also stressed the need for enhanced interdisciplinary training and communication as well as considerable investment into the generation and curation of appropriate reference omic data. Conclusions: The participants concluded that, although there are hurdles to pass on the road to regulatory acceptance, omics technologies are already useful for elucidating modes of action of toxicants and can contribute to the risk assessment process as part of a weight-of-evidence approach.

KW - Environment

KW - Environmental monitoring

KW - Fish

KW - Metabolomics

KW - Microarray

KW - Regulatory toxicology

KW - Transcriptomics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77149124246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77149124246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1289/ehp.0900985

DO - 10.1289/ehp.0900985

M3 - Article

C2 - 20056575

AN - SCOPUS:77149124246

VL - 118

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Environmental Health Perspectives

JF - Environmental Health Perspectives

SN - 0091-6765

IS - 1

ER -