Integrating Motivational, Social, and Contextual Work Design Features: A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature

Stephen E. Humphrey, Jennifer Craig, Frederick P. Morgeson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

838 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors developed and meta-analytically examined hypotheses designed to test and extend work design theory by integrating motivational, social, and work context characteristics. Results from a summary of 259 studies and 219,625 participants showed that 14 work characteristics explained, on average, 43% of the variance in the 19 worker attitudes and behaviors examined. For example, motivational characteristics explained 25% of the variance in subjective performance, 2% in turnover perceptions, 34% in job satisfaction, 24% in organizational commitment, and 26% in role perception outcomes. Beyond motivational characteristics, social characteristics explained incremental variances of 9% of the variance in subjective performance, 24% in turnover intentions, 17% in job satisfaction, 40% in organizational commitment, and 18% in role perception outcomes. Finally, beyond both motivational and social characteristics, work context characteristics explained incremental variances of 4% in job satisfaction and 16% in stress. The results of this study suggest numerous opportunities for the continued development of work design theory and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1332-1356
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume92
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Job Satisfaction
Social Work
Sociological Factors

Keywords

  • job design
  • performance
  • satisfaction
  • social support
  • work design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Integrating Motivational, Social, and Contextual Work Design Features : A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature. / Humphrey, Stephen E.; Craig, Jennifer; Morgeson, Frederick P.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 5, 09.2007, p. 1332-1356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbe9f1eaac2e4a05bc0b8708d5ece696,
title = "Integrating Motivational, Social, and Contextual Work Design Features: A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature",
abstract = "The authors developed and meta-analytically examined hypotheses designed to test and extend work design theory by integrating motivational, social, and work context characteristics. Results from a summary of 259 studies and 219,625 participants showed that 14 work characteristics explained, on average, 43{\%} of the variance in the 19 worker attitudes and behaviors examined. For example, motivational characteristics explained 25{\%} of the variance in subjective performance, 2{\%} in turnover perceptions, 34{\%} in job satisfaction, 24{\%} in organizational commitment, and 26{\%} in role perception outcomes. Beyond motivational characteristics, social characteristics explained incremental variances of 9{\%} of the variance in subjective performance, 24{\%} in turnover intentions, 17{\%} in job satisfaction, 40{\%} in organizational commitment, and 18{\%} in role perception outcomes. Finally, beyond both motivational and social characteristics, work context characteristics explained incremental variances of 4{\%} in job satisfaction and 16{\%} in stress. The results of this study suggest numerous opportunities for the continued development of work design theory and practice.",
keywords = "job design, performance, satisfaction, social support, work design",
author = "Humphrey, {Stephen E.} and Jennifer Craig and Morgeson, {Frederick P.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "1332--1356",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating Motivational, Social, and Contextual Work Design Features

T2 - A Meta-Analytic Summary and Theoretical Extension of the Work Design Literature

AU - Humphrey, Stephen E.

AU - Craig, Jennifer

AU - Morgeson, Frederick P.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - The authors developed and meta-analytically examined hypotheses designed to test and extend work design theory by integrating motivational, social, and work context characteristics. Results from a summary of 259 studies and 219,625 participants showed that 14 work characteristics explained, on average, 43% of the variance in the 19 worker attitudes and behaviors examined. For example, motivational characteristics explained 25% of the variance in subjective performance, 2% in turnover perceptions, 34% in job satisfaction, 24% in organizational commitment, and 26% in role perception outcomes. Beyond motivational characteristics, social characteristics explained incremental variances of 9% of the variance in subjective performance, 24% in turnover intentions, 17% in job satisfaction, 40% in organizational commitment, and 18% in role perception outcomes. Finally, beyond both motivational and social characteristics, work context characteristics explained incremental variances of 4% in job satisfaction and 16% in stress. The results of this study suggest numerous opportunities for the continued development of work design theory and practice.

AB - The authors developed and meta-analytically examined hypotheses designed to test and extend work design theory by integrating motivational, social, and work context characteristics. Results from a summary of 259 studies and 219,625 participants showed that 14 work characteristics explained, on average, 43% of the variance in the 19 worker attitudes and behaviors examined. For example, motivational characteristics explained 25% of the variance in subjective performance, 2% in turnover perceptions, 34% in job satisfaction, 24% in organizational commitment, and 26% in role perception outcomes. Beyond motivational characteristics, social characteristics explained incremental variances of 9% of the variance in subjective performance, 24% in turnover intentions, 17% in job satisfaction, 40% in organizational commitment, and 18% in role perception outcomes. Finally, beyond both motivational and social characteristics, work context characteristics explained incremental variances of 4% in job satisfaction and 16% in stress. The results of this study suggest numerous opportunities for the continued development of work design theory and practice.

KW - job design

KW - performance

KW - satisfaction

KW - social support

KW - work design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34748871335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34748871335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332

M3 - Article

C2 - 17845089

AN - SCOPUS:34748871335

VL - 92

SP - 1332

EP - 1356

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 5

ER -