Integrating GIS and remote sensing for vegetation analysis and modeling: methodological issues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

109 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract. GIS and remote sensing have emerged as distinct spatial data handling technologies with their own methods of data representation and analysis. Combining them as tools to support vegetation analysis and modeling thus presents a number of challenges. The paper begins by describing the major data sources, applications, and software characteristics of each technology, and then compares them within a consistent terminological framework that emphasizes the digital representation of continuously varying spatial data. Because the spatial continuum can be discretized in many different ways, and because each can only approximate the truth, both GIS and remote sensing are subject to error and uncertainty. Integration, and subsequent analysis and modeling, require that explicit attention be directed to uncertainty. The paper reviews the models of error that have been developed in recent years for spatial data and examines their use in the interface between GIS and remote sensing. The paper looks at the functional requirements of modeling, and includes discussion of error propagation. 1994 IAVS ‐ the International Association of Vegetation Science

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)615-626
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Vegetation Science
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

spatial data
remote sensing
GIS
vegetation
modeling
uncertainty
software
analysis
methodology
method
science

Keywords

  • Error model
  • Error propagation
  • GIS
  • Spatial data
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Integrating GIS and remote sensing for vegetation analysis and modeling : methodological issues. / Goodchild, Michael.

In: Journal of Vegetation Science, Vol. 5, No. 5, 01.01.1994, p. 615-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7feb4eafc4a34108bf4231941a719c47,
title = "Integrating GIS and remote sensing for vegetation analysis and modeling: methodological issues",
abstract = "Abstract. GIS and remote sensing have emerged as distinct spatial data handling technologies with their own methods of data representation and analysis. Combining them as tools to support vegetation analysis and modeling thus presents a number of challenges. The paper begins by describing the major data sources, applications, and software characteristics of each technology, and then compares them within a consistent terminological framework that emphasizes the digital representation of continuously varying spatial data. Because the spatial continuum can be discretized in many different ways, and because each can only approximate the truth, both GIS and remote sensing are subject to error and uncertainty. Integration, and subsequent analysis and modeling, require that explicit attention be directed to uncertainty. The paper reviews the models of error that have been developed in recent years for spatial data and examines their use in the interface between GIS and remote sensing. The paper looks at the functional requirements of modeling, and includes discussion of error propagation. 1994 IAVS ‐ the International Association of Vegetation Science",
keywords = "Error model, Error propagation, GIS, Spatial data, Uncertainty",
author = "Michael Goodchild",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/3235878",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "615--626",
journal = "Journal of Vegetation Science",
issn = "1100-9233",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating GIS and remote sensing for vegetation analysis and modeling

T2 - methodological issues

AU - Goodchild, Michael

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Abstract. GIS and remote sensing have emerged as distinct spatial data handling technologies with their own methods of data representation and analysis. Combining them as tools to support vegetation analysis and modeling thus presents a number of challenges. The paper begins by describing the major data sources, applications, and software characteristics of each technology, and then compares them within a consistent terminological framework that emphasizes the digital representation of continuously varying spatial data. Because the spatial continuum can be discretized in many different ways, and because each can only approximate the truth, both GIS and remote sensing are subject to error and uncertainty. Integration, and subsequent analysis and modeling, require that explicit attention be directed to uncertainty. The paper reviews the models of error that have been developed in recent years for spatial data and examines their use in the interface between GIS and remote sensing. The paper looks at the functional requirements of modeling, and includes discussion of error propagation. 1994 IAVS ‐ the International Association of Vegetation Science

AB - Abstract. GIS and remote sensing have emerged as distinct spatial data handling technologies with their own methods of data representation and analysis. Combining them as tools to support vegetation analysis and modeling thus presents a number of challenges. The paper begins by describing the major data sources, applications, and software characteristics of each technology, and then compares them within a consistent terminological framework that emphasizes the digital representation of continuously varying spatial data. Because the spatial continuum can be discretized in many different ways, and because each can only approximate the truth, both GIS and remote sensing are subject to error and uncertainty. Integration, and subsequent analysis and modeling, require that explicit attention be directed to uncertainty. The paper reviews the models of error that have been developed in recent years for spatial data and examines their use in the interface between GIS and remote sensing. The paper looks at the functional requirements of modeling, and includes discussion of error propagation. 1994 IAVS ‐ the International Association of Vegetation Science

KW - Error model

KW - Error propagation

KW - GIS

KW - Spatial data

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028562412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028562412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/3235878

DO - 10.2307/3235878

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0028562412

VL - 5

SP - 615

EP - 626

JO - Journal of Vegetation Science

JF - Journal of Vegetation Science

SN - 1100-9233

IS - 5

ER -