Integrating Acquired Preparedness and Dual Process Models of Risk for Heavy Drinking and Related Problems

William Corbin, Anna Papova, Meghan E. Morean, Stephanie S. O'Malley, Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Anissa Abi-Dargham, Alan Anticevic, Godfrey Pearlson, Ismene Petrakis, Brian P. Pittman, John H. Krystal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The acquired preparedness model (APM) posits that alcohol expectancies mediate effects of personality traits on drinking outcomes, whereas the dual process model (DPM) suggests that top-down behavioral control (e.g., self-control) moderates the impact of bottom-up risk factors such as alcohol expectancies. This study sought to integrate the APM and DPM by examining the extent to which indirect effects of impulsive sensation seeking on drinking outcomes are moderated by self-control. We hypothesized that the APM may hold more strongly for people who are higher in self-control, as they may engage in alcohol use for the explicit purpose of meeting sensation-seeking goals. Data were from 462 participants (ages 15-63 years; 58.4% male) who completed 1 of 5 studies affiliated with the Center for the Translational Neuroscience of Alcoholism. Consistent with the APM, higher levels of impulsive sensation seeking were associated with stronger positive expectancies, which, in turn, contributed to heavier drinking and related problems. Consistent with the DPM, among nondependent drinkers, indirect effects of impulsive sensation seeking on alcohol use were present only among those who were high in self-control. These findings suggest that expectancy challenges may be most effective for those with high levels of self-control prior to the development of alcohol dependence. However, future studies integrating the APM and DPM should include both implicit and explicit measures of expectancies to address the possibility that individuals with lower levels of self-control may be more influenced by automatic or implicit influences and may, therefore, respond well to implicit expectancy challenges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)864-874
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology of Addictive Behaviors
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Drinking
Alcohols
Alcoholism
Neurosciences
Personality
Self-Control

Keywords

  • acquired preparedness
  • alcohol problems
  • dual process
  • impulsivity
  • self-control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Corbin, W., Papova, A., Morean, M. E., O'Malley, S. S., Krishnan-Sarin, S., Abi-Dargham, A., ... Krystal, J. H. (2015). Integrating Acquired Preparedness and Dual Process Models of Risk for Heavy Drinking and Related Problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(4), 864-874. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000093

Integrating Acquired Preparedness and Dual Process Models of Risk for Heavy Drinking and Related Problems. / Corbin, William; Papova, Anna; Morean, Meghan E.; O'Malley, Stephanie S.; Krishnan-Sarin, Suchitra; Abi-Dargham, Anissa; Anticevic, Alan; Pearlson, Godfrey; Petrakis, Ismene; Pittman, Brian P.; Krystal, John H.

In: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 864-874.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Corbin, W, Papova, A, Morean, ME, O'Malley, SS, Krishnan-Sarin, S, Abi-Dargham, A, Anticevic, A, Pearlson, G, Petrakis, I, Pittman, BP & Krystal, JH 2015, 'Integrating Acquired Preparedness and Dual Process Models of Risk for Heavy Drinking and Related Problems', Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 864-874. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000093
Corbin, William ; Papova, Anna ; Morean, Meghan E. ; O'Malley, Stephanie S. ; Krishnan-Sarin, Suchitra ; Abi-Dargham, Anissa ; Anticevic, Alan ; Pearlson, Godfrey ; Petrakis, Ismene ; Pittman, Brian P. ; Krystal, John H. / Integrating Acquired Preparedness and Dual Process Models of Risk for Heavy Drinking and Related Problems. In: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 864-874.
@article{04730791a3244541969dbc6a7579c4e4,
title = "Integrating Acquired Preparedness and Dual Process Models of Risk for Heavy Drinking and Related Problems",
abstract = "The acquired preparedness model (APM) posits that alcohol expectancies mediate effects of personality traits on drinking outcomes, whereas the dual process model (DPM) suggests that top-down behavioral control (e.g., self-control) moderates the impact of bottom-up risk factors such as alcohol expectancies. This study sought to integrate the APM and DPM by examining the extent to which indirect effects of impulsive sensation seeking on drinking outcomes are moderated by self-control. We hypothesized that the APM may hold more strongly for people who are higher in self-control, as they may engage in alcohol use for the explicit purpose of meeting sensation-seeking goals. Data were from 462 participants (ages 15-63 years; 58.4{\%} male) who completed 1 of 5 studies affiliated with the Center for the Translational Neuroscience of Alcoholism. Consistent with the APM, higher levels of impulsive sensation seeking were associated with stronger positive expectancies, which, in turn, contributed to heavier drinking and related problems. Consistent with the DPM, among nondependent drinkers, indirect effects of impulsive sensation seeking on alcohol use were present only among those who were high in self-control. These findings suggest that expectancy challenges may be most effective for those with high levels of self-control prior to the development of alcohol dependence. However, future studies integrating the APM and DPM should include both implicit and explicit measures of expectancies to address the possibility that individuals with lower levels of self-control may be more influenced by automatic or implicit influences and may, therefore, respond well to implicit expectancy challenges.",
keywords = "acquired preparedness, alcohol problems, dual process, impulsivity, self-control",
author = "William Corbin and Anna Papova and Morean, {Meghan E.} and O'Malley, {Stephanie S.} and Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin and Anissa Abi-Dargham and Alan Anticevic and Godfrey Pearlson and Ismene Petrakis and Pittman, {Brian P.} and Krystal, {John H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/adb0000093",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "864--874",
journal = "Psychology of Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0893-164X",
publisher = "Educational Publishing Foundation",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating Acquired Preparedness and Dual Process Models of Risk for Heavy Drinking and Related Problems

AU - Corbin, William

AU - Papova, Anna

AU - Morean, Meghan E.

AU - O'Malley, Stephanie S.

AU - Krishnan-Sarin, Suchitra

AU - Abi-Dargham, Anissa

AU - Anticevic, Alan

AU - Pearlson, Godfrey

AU - Petrakis, Ismene

AU - Pittman, Brian P.

AU - Krystal, John H.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The acquired preparedness model (APM) posits that alcohol expectancies mediate effects of personality traits on drinking outcomes, whereas the dual process model (DPM) suggests that top-down behavioral control (e.g., self-control) moderates the impact of bottom-up risk factors such as alcohol expectancies. This study sought to integrate the APM and DPM by examining the extent to which indirect effects of impulsive sensation seeking on drinking outcomes are moderated by self-control. We hypothesized that the APM may hold more strongly for people who are higher in self-control, as they may engage in alcohol use for the explicit purpose of meeting sensation-seeking goals. Data were from 462 participants (ages 15-63 years; 58.4% male) who completed 1 of 5 studies affiliated with the Center for the Translational Neuroscience of Alcoholism. Consistent with the APM, higher levels of impulsive sensation seeking were associated with stronger positive expectancies, which, in turn, contributed to heavier drinking and related problems. Consistent with the DPM, among nondependent drinkers, indirect effects of impulsive sensation seeking on alcohol use were present only among those who were high in self-control. These findings suggest that expectancy challenges may be most effective for those with high levels of self-control prior to the development of alcohol dependence. However, future studies integrating the APM and DPM should include both implicit and explicit measures of expectancies to address the possibility that individuals with lower levels of self-control may be more influenced by automatic or implicit influences and may, therefore, respond well to implicit expectancy challenges.

AB - The acquired preparedness model (APM) posits that alcohol expectancies mediate effects of personality traits on drinking outcomes, whereas the dual process model (DPM) suggests that top-down behavioral control (e.g., self-control) moderates the impact of bottom-up risk factors such as alcohol expectancies. This study sought to integrate the APM and DPM by examining the extent to which indirect effects of impulsive sensation seeking on drinking outcomes are moderated by self-control. We hypothesized that the APM may hold more strongly for people who are higher in self-control, as they may engage in alcohol use for the explicit purpose of meeting sensation-seeking goals. Data were from 462 participants (ages 15-63 years; 58.4% male) who completed 1 of 5 studies affiliated with the Center for the Translational Neuroscience of Alcoholism. Consistent with the APM, higher levels of impulsive sensation seeking were associated with stronger positive expectancies, which, in turn, contributed to heavier drinking and related problems. Consistent with the DPM, among nondependent drinkers, indirect effects of impulsive sensation seeking on alcohol use were present only among those who were high in self-control. These findings suggest that expectancy challenges may be most effective for those with high levels of self-control prior to the development of alcohol dependence. However, future studies integrating the APM and DPM should include both implicit and explicit measures of expectancies to address the possibility that individuals with lower levels of self-control may be more influenced by automatic or implicit influences and may, therefore, respond well to implicit expectancy challenges.

KW - acquired preparedness

KW - alcohol problems

KW - dual process

KW - impulsivity

KW - self-control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952984544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952984544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/adb0000093

DO - 10.1037/adb0000093

M3 - Article

C2 - 26348221

AN - SCOPUS:84952984544

VL - 29

SP - 864

EP - 874

JO - Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

JF - Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0893-164X

IS - 4

ER -