Integrating abilities and interests in career choice: Maximal versus typical assessment

Maria Darcy, Terence Tracey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present article focuses on ways in which structural information from the ability and interest domains can be usefully integrated to inform career development and choice processes as well as allied research. Examining the structural models in these two domains, in addition to the distinction between maximal and typical assessment, the authors suggest that self-assessments of ability/self-efficacy have greater utility than assessments of maximal ability for informing career exploration and choice. Given this, they note several ways that self-ratings of ability can be integrated with interest information in clinical settings. In the second section, they focus on the definition of the general factor in vocational interest data. The authors hypothesize that this factor can be interpreted as interest flexibility and is particularly salient as a moderator in the person-environment fit - career outcome relation. They then propose a number of testable hypotheses relevant to this relation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-237
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Career Assessment
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2003

Fingerprint

Career Choice
Aptitude
Structural Models
Self Efficacy
Career choice
Research
Factors
Integrated

Keywords

  • Interest flexibility
  • Maximal ability
  • Self-rated abilities
  • Typical ability
  • Vocational interests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Integrating abilities and interests in career choice : Maximal versus typical assessment. / Darcy, Maria; Tracey, Terence.

In: Journal of Career Assessment, Vol. 11, No. 2, 05.2003, p. 219-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff195844fbb44df89f99a5bcc926ce9c,
title = "Integrating abilities and interests in career choice: Maximal versus typical assessment",
abstract = "The present article focuses on ways in which structural information from the ability and interest domains can be usefully integrated to inform career development and choice processes as well as allied research. Examining the structural models in these two domains, in addition to the distinction between maximal and typical assessment, the authors suggest that self-assessments of ability/self-efficacy have greater utility than assessments of maximal ability for informing career exploration and choice. Given this, they note several ways that self-ratings of ability can be integrated with interest information in clinical settings. In the second section, they focus on the definition of the general factor in vocational interest data. The authors hypothesize that this factor can be interpreted as interest flexibility and is particularly salient as a moderator in the person-environment fit - career outcome relation. They then propose a number of testable hypotheses relevant to this relation.",
keywords = "Interest flexibility, Maximal ability, Self-rated abilities, Typical ability, Vocational interests",
author = "Maria Darcy and Terence Tracey",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/1069072703011002007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "219--237",
journal = "Journal of Career Assessment",
issn = "1069-0727",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating abilities and interests in career choice

T2 - Maximal versus typical assessment

AU - Darcy, Maria

AU - Tracey, Terence

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - The present article focuses on ways in which structural information from the ability and interest domains can be usefully integrated to inform career development and choice processes as well as allied research. Examining the structural models in these two domains, in addition to the distinction between maximal and typical assessment, the authors suggest that self-assessments of ability/self-efficacy have greater utility than assessments of maximal ability for informing career exploration and choice. Given this, they note several ways that self-ratings of ability can be integrated with interest information in clinical settings. In the second section, they focus on the definition of the general factor in vocational interest data. The authors hypothesize that this factor can be interpreted as interest flexibility and is particularly salient as a moderator in the person-environment fit - career outcome relation. They then propose a number of testable hypotheses relevant to this relation.

AB - The present article focuses on ways in which structural information from the ability and interest domains can be usefully integrated to inform career development and choice processes as well as allied research. Examining the structural models in these two domains, in addition to the distinction between maximal and typical assessment, the authors suggest that self-assessments of ability/self-efficacy have greater utility than assessments of maximal ability for informing career exploration and choice. Given this, they note several ways that self-ratings of ability can be integrated with interest information in clinical settings. In the second section, they focus on the definition of the general factor in vocational interest data. The authors hypothesize that this factor can be interpreted as interest flexibility and is particularly salient as a moderator in the person-environment fit - career outcome relation. They then propose a number of testable hypotheses relevant to this relation.

KW - Interest flexibility

KW - Maximal ability

KW - Self-rated abilities

KW - Typical ability

KW - Vocational interests

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038249088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038249088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1069072703011002007

DO - 10.1177/1069072703011002007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0038249088

VL - 11

SP - 219

EP - 237

JO - Journal of Career Assessment

JF - Journal of Career Assessment

SN - 1069-0727

IS - 2

ER -