Instrument selection for randomized controlled trials

Why this and not that?

Kathie Records, Colleen Keller, Barbara Ainsworth, Paska Permana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A fundamental linchpin for obtaining rigorous findings in quantitative research involves the selection of survey instruments. Psychometric recommendations are available for the processes for scale development and testing and guidance for selection of established scales. These processes are necessary to address the validity link between the phenomena under investigation, the empirical measures and, ultimately, the theoretical ties between these and the world views of the participants. Detailed information is most often provided about study design and protocols, but far less frequently is a detailed theoretical explanation provided for why specific instruments are chosen. Guidance to inform choices is often difficult to find when scales are needed for specific cultural, ethnic, or racial groups. This paper details the rationale underlying instrument selection for measurement of the major processes (intervention, mediator and moderator variables, outcome variables) in an ongoing study of postpartum Latinas, Madres para la Salud [Mothers for Health]. The rationale underpinning our choices includes a discussion of alternatives, when appropriate. These exemplars may provide direction for other intervention researchers who are working with specific cultural, racial, or ethnic groups or for other investigators who are seeking to select the 'best' instrument. Thoughtful consideration of measurement and articulation of the rationale underlying our choices facilitates the maintenance of rigor within the study design and improves our ability to assess study outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-150
Number of pages8
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Research Personnel
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Aptitude
Hispanic Americans
Ethnic Groups
Psychometrics
Postpartum Period
Maintenance
Mothers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Instrument
  • Intervention
  • Randomized controlled trials
  • Reliability
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Instrument selection for randomized controlled trials : Why this and not that? / Records, Kathie; Keller, Colleen; Ainsworth, Barbara; Permana, Paska.

In: Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 143-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Records, Kathie ; Keller, Colleen ; Ainsworth, Barbara ; Permana, Paska. / Instrument selection for randomized controlled trials : Why this and not that?. In: Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2012 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 143-150.
@article{b7218233b0df45e1a29a5db61a943ee0,
title = "Instrument selection for randomized controlled trials: Why this and not that?",
abstract = "A fundamental linchpin for obtaining rigorous findings in quantitative research involves the selection of survey instruments. Psychometric recommendations are available for the processes for scale development and testing and guidance for selection of established scales. These processes are necessary to address the validity link between the phenomena under investigation, the empirical measures and, ultimately, the theoretical ties between these and the world views of the participants. Detailed information is most often provided about study design and protocols, but far less frequently is a detailed theoretical explanation provided for why specific instruments are chosen. Guidance to inform choices is often difficult to find when scales are needed for specific cultural, ethnic, or racial groups. This paper details the rationale underlying instrument selection for measurement of the major processes (intervention, mediator and moderator variables, outcome variables) in an ongoing study of postpartum Latinas, Madres para la Salud [Mothers for Health]. The rationale underpinning our choices includes a discussion of alternatives, when appropriate. These exemplars may provide direction for other intervention researchers who are working with specific cultural, racial, or ethnic groups or for other investigators who are seeking to select the 'best' instrument. Thoughtful consideration of measurement and articulation of the rationale underlying our choices facilitates the maintenance of rigor within the study design and improves our ability to assess study outcomes.",
keywords = "Instrument, Intervention, Randomized controlled trials, Reliability, Validity",
author = "Kathie Records and Colleen Keller and Barbara Ainsworth and Paska Permana",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "143--150",
journal = "Contemporary Clinical Trials",
issn = "1551-7144",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Instrument selection for randomized controlled trials

T2 - Why this and not that?

AU - Records, Kathie

AU - Keller, Colleen

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

AU - Permana, Paska

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - A fundamental linchpin for obtaining rigorous findings in quantitative research involves the selection of survey instruments. Psychometric recommendations are available for the processes for scale development and testing and guidance for selection of established scales. These processes are necessary to address the validity link between the phenomena under investigation, the empirical measures and, ultimately, the theoretical ties between these and the world views of the participants. Detailed information is most often provided about study design and protocols, but far less frequently is a detailed theoretical explanation provided for why specific instruments are chosen. Guidance to inform choices is often difficult to find when scales are needed for specific cultural, ethnic, or racial groups. This paper details the rationale underlying instrument selection for measurement of the major processes (intervention, mediator and moderator variables, outcome variables) in an ongoing study of postpartum Latinas, Madres para la Salud [Mothers for Health]. The rationale underpinning our choices includes a discussion of alternatives, when appropriate. These exemplars may provide direction for other intervention researchers who are working with specific cultural, racial, or ethnic groups or for other investigators who are seeking to select the 'best' instrument. Thoughtful consideration of measurement and articulation of the rationale underlying our choices facilitates the maintenance of rigor within the study design and improves our ability to assess study outcomes.

AB - A fundamental linchpin for obtaining rigorous findings in quantitative research involves the selection of survey instruments. Psychometric recommendations are available for the processes for scale development and testing and guidance for selection of established scales. These processes are necessary to address the validity link between the phenomena under investigation, the empirical measures and, ultimately, the theoretical ties between these and the world views of the participants. Detailed information is most often provided about study design and protocols, but far less frequently is a detailed theoretical explanation provided for why specific instruments are chosen. Guidance to inform choices is often difficult to find when scales are needed for specific cultural, ethnic, or racial groups. This paper details the rationale underlying instrument selection for measurement of the major processes (intervention, mediator and moderator variables, outcome variables) in an ongoing study of postpartum Latinas, Madres para la Salud [Mothers for Health]. The rationale underpinning our choices includes a discussion of alternatives, when appropriate. These exemplars may provide direction for other intervention researchers who are working with specific cultural, racial, or ethnic groups or for other investigators who are seeking to select the 'best' instrument. Thoughtful consideration of measurement and articulation of the rationale underlying our choices facilitates the maintenance of rigor within the study design and improves our ability to assess study outcomes.

KW - Instrument

KW - Intervention

KW - Randomized controlled trials

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855339882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855339882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.006

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 143

EP - 150

JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials

JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials

SN - 1551-7144

IS - 1

ER -