7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although many countries have ethnic kin on the "wrong side" of their borders, few seek to annex foreign territories on the basis of ethnicity. This article examines why some states pursue irredentism, whereas others exhibit restraint. It focuses on the triadic structure of the kin group in the irredentist state, its coethnic enclave, and the host state, and provides new data on all actual and potential irredentist cases from 1946 to 2014. The results indicate that irredentism is more likely when the kin group is near economic parity with other groups in its own state, which results in status inconsistency and engenders grievances. It is also more likely in more ethnically homogeneous countries with winner-take-all majoritarian systems where the kin group does not need to moderate its policy to win elections by attracting other groups. These conditions generate both the grievance and opportunity for kin groups to pursue irredentism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Group
status inconsistency
ethnicity
election
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Inside Irredentism : A Global Empirical Analysis. / Siroky, David; Hale, Christopher W.

In: American Journal of Political Science, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea5a81eab9a8457bbcc802e46dde5bcf,
title = "Inside Irredentism: A Global Empirical Analysis",
abstract = "Although many countries have ethnic kin on the {"}wrong side{"} of their borders, few seek to annex foreign territories on the basis of ethnicity. This article examines why some states pursue irredentism, whereas others exhibit restraint. It focuses on the triadic structure of the kin group in the irredentist state, its coethnic enclave, and the host state, and provides new data on all actual and potential irredentist cases from 1946 to 2014. The results indicate that irredentism is more likely when the kin group is near economic parity with other groups in its own state, which results in status inconsistency and engenders grievances. It is also more likely in more ethnically homogeneous countries with winner-take-all majoritarian systems where the kin group does not need to moderate its policy to win elections by attracting other groups. These conditions generate both the grievance and opportunity for kin groups to pursue irredentism.",
author = "David Siroky and Hale, {Christopher W.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/ajps.12271",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inside Irredentism

T2 - A Global Empirical Analysis

AU - Siroky, David

AU - Hale, Christopher W.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Although many countries have ethnic kin on the "wrong side" of their borders, few seek to annex foreign territories on the basis of ethnicity. This article examines why some states pursue irredentism, whereas others exhibit restraint. It focuses on the triadic structure of the kin group in the irredentist state, its coethnic enclave, and the host state, and provides new data on all actual and potential irredentist cases from 1946 to 2014. The results indicate that irredentism is more likely when the kin group is near economic parity with other groups in its own state, which results in status inconsistency and engenders grievances. It is also more likely in more ethnically homogeneous countries with winner-take-all majoritarian systems where the kin group does not need to moderate its policy to win elections by attracting other groups. These conditions generate both the grievance and opportunity for kin groups to pursue irredentism.

AB - Although many countries have ethnic kin on the "wrong side" of their borders, few seek to annex foreign territories on the basis of ethnicity. This article examines why some states pursue irredentism, whereas others exhibit restraint. It focuses on the triadic structure of the kin group in the irredentist state, its coethnic enclave, and the host state, and provides new data on all actual and potential irredentist cases from 1946 to 2014. The results indicate that irredentism is more likely when the kin group is near economic parity with other groups in its own state, which results in status inconsistency and engenders grievances. It is also more likely in more ethnically homogeneous countries with winner-take-all majoritarian systems where the kin group does not need to moderate its policy to win elections by attracting other groups. These conditions generate both the grievance and opportunity for kin groups to pursue irredentism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999025075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84999025075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajps.12271

DO - 10.1111/ajps.12271

M3 - Article

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

ER -