Innovative evaluation methods for bioremediation

Eric A. Seagren, David J. Hollander, David A. Stahl, Bruce Rittmann

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Bioremediation is a potentially powerful technique for remediating environmental contamination by NAPLs; however, performance evaluation of bioremediation, especially in situ bioremediation, in the field is difficult due to the uncertainty created by matrix and contaminant heterogeneity, inaccessibility to observation, expense of sampling, and limitations of some measurements. The objective of this research is to provide a prototype for conversion of the NRC's (NRC, 1993) general guidelines for evaluating bioremediation into practical protocols by: (1) integrating routine chemical analyses with innovative techniques from molecular biology and geochemistry into a rational evaluation strategy; and (2) demonstrating the strategy's application in laboratory-scale mesocosms simulating bioremediation of NAPL contaminated soils. The importance of using a comprehensive, coordinated suite of tests to evaluate bioremediation is demonstrated by data for several analyses from a laboratory-scale slurry-phase bioremediation of a top-soil contaminated with a synthetic NAPL of phenanthrene dissolved in dodecane. These data provide four key pieces of evidence indicative of successful bioremediation: (1) documentation of the loss of phenanthrene, (2) an increase in aqueous-phase TIC, (3) a decrease in the δ13C of the dissolved inorganic pool, and (4) a correlation between the phenanthrene removal and the increase in the number of phenanthrene-degrading bacteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationASCE Specialty Conference, Proceedings
Place of PublicationNew York, NY, United States
PublisherASCE
Pages381-392
Number of pages12
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1996 Specialty Conference - Washington, DC, USA
Duration: Nov 12 1996Nov 14 1996

Other

OtherProceedings of the 1996 Specialty Conference
CityWashington, DC, USA
Period11/12/9611/14/96

Fingerprint

Bioremediation
Soils
Molecular biology
Geochemistry
Bacteria
Contamination
Impurities
Sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Seagren, E. A., Hollander, D. J., Stahl, D. A., & Rittmann, B. (1996). Innovative evaluation methods for bioremediation. In ASCE Specialty Conference, Proceedings (pp. 381-392). New York, NY, United States: ASCE.

Innovative evaluation methods for bioremediation. / Seagren, Eric A.; Hollander, David J.; Stahl, David A.; Rittmann, Bruce.

ASCE Specialty Conference, Proceedings. New York, NY, United States : ASCE, 1996. p. 381-392.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Seagren, EA, Hollander, DJ, Stahl, DA & Rittmann, B 1996, Innovative evaluation methods for bioremediation. in ASCE Specialty Conference, Proceedings. ASCE, New York, NY, United States, pp. 381-392, Proceedings of the 1996 Specialty Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 11/12/96.
Seagren EA, Hollander DJ, Stahl DA, Rittmann B. Innovative evaluation methods for bioremediation. In ASCE Specialty Conference, Proceedings. New York, NY, United States: ASCE. 1996. p. 381-392
Seagren, Eric A. ; Hollander, David J. ; Stahl, David A. ; Rittmann, Bruce. / Innovative evaluation methods for bioremediation. ASCE Specialty Conference, Proceedings. New York, NY, United States : ASCE, 1996. pp. 381-392
@inproceedings{8e9d3f65a0e14f8484d184ac3102d900,
title = "Innovative evaluation methods for bioremediation",
abstract = "Bioremediation is a potentially powerful technique for remediating environmental contamination by NAPLs; however, performance evaluation of bioremediation, especially in situ bioremediation, in the field is difficult due to the uncertainty created by matrix and contaminant heterogeneity, inaccessibility to observation, expense of sampling, and limitations of some measurements. The objective of this research is to provide a prototype for conversion of the NRC's (NRC, 1993) general guidelines for evaluating bioremediation into practical protocols by: (1) integrating routine chemical analyses with innovative techniques from molecular biology and geochemistry into a rational evaluation strategy; and (2) demonstrating the strategy's application in laboratory-scale mesocosms simulating bioremediation of NAPL contaminated soils. The importance of using a comprehensive, coordinated suite of tests to evaluate bioremediation is demonstrated by data for several analyses from a laboratory-scale slurry-phase bioremediation of a top-soil contaminated with a synthetic NAPL of phenanthrene dissolved in dodecane. These data provide four key pieces of evidence indicative of successful bioremediation: (1) documentation of the loss of phenanthrene, (2) an increase in aqueous-phase TIC, (3) a decrease in the δ13C of the dissolved inorganic pool, and (4) a correlation between the phenanthrene removal and the increase in the number of phenanthrene-degrading bacteria.",
author = "Seagren, {Eric A.} and Hollander, {David J.} and Stahl, {David A.} and Bruce Rittmann",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "381--392",
booktitle = "ASCE Specialty Conference, Proceedings",
publisher = "ASCE",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Innovative evaluation methods for bioremediation

AU - Seagren, Eric A.

AU - Hollander, David J.

AU - Stahl, David A.

AU - Rittmann, Bruce

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Bioremediation is a potentially powerful technique for remediating environmental contamination by NAPLs; however, performance evaluation of bioremediation, especially in situ bioremediation, in the field is difficult due to the uncertainty created by matrix and contaminant heterogeneity, inaccessibility to observation, expense of sampling, and limitations of some measurements. The objective of this research is to provide a prototype for conversion of the NRC's (NRC, 1993) general guidelines for evaluating bioremediation into practical protocols by: (1) integrating routine chemical analyses with innovative techniques from molecular biology and geochemistry into a rational evaluation strategy; and (2) demonstrating the strategy's application in laboratory-scale mesocosms simulating bioremediation of NAPL contaminated soils. The importance of using a comprehensive, coordinated suite of tests to evaluate bioremediation is demonstrated by data for several analyses from a laboratory-scale slurry-phase bioremediation of a top-soil contaminated with a synthetic NAPL of phenanthrene dissolved in dodecane. These data provide four key pieces of evidence indicative of successful bioremediation: (1) documentation of the loss of phenanthrene, (2) an increase in aqueous-phase TIC, (3) a decrease in the δ13C of the dissolved inorganic pool, and (4) a correlation between the phenanthrene removal and the increase in the number of phenanthrene-degrading bacteria.

AB - Bioremediation is a potentially powerful technique for remediating environmental contamination by NAPLs; however, performance evaluation of bioremediation, especially in situ bioremediation, in the field is difficult due to the uncertainty created by matrix and contaminant heterogeneity, inaccessibility to observation, expense of sampling, and limitations of some measurements. The objective of this research is to provide a prototype for conversion of the NRC's (NRC, 1993) general guidelines for evaluating bioremediation into practical protocols by: (1) integrating routine chemical analyses with innovative techniques from molecular biology and geochemistry into a rational evaluation strategy; and (2) demonstrating the strategy's application in laboratory-scale mesocosms simulating bioremediation of NAPL contaminated soils. The importance of using a comprehensive, coordinated suite of tests to evaluate bioremediation is demonstrated by data for several analyses from a laboratory-scale slurry-phase bioremediation of a top-soil contaminated with a synthetic NAPL of phenanthrene dissolved in dodecane. These data provide four key pieces of evidence indicative of successful bioremediation: (1) documentation of the loss of phenanthrene, (2) an increase in aqueous-phase TIC, (3) a decrease in the δ13C of the dissolved inorganic pool, and (4) a correlation between the phenanthrene removal and the increase in the number of phenanthrene-degrading bacteria.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030412688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030412688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 381

EP - 392

BT - ASCE Specialty Conference, Proceedings

PB - ASCE

CY - New York, NY, United States

ER -