Innocent reflections on science and technology policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay explores one scholar's serendipitous wandering into the world of science and technology policy and suggests that such an idiosyncratic and opportunistic path is probably not really unusual. The paper explores why a historian/philosopher of science has something of value to say on the subject and why science and technology policy matters. I contend that we need more and a broader range of academics to think about science and technology policy and to engage in policy-making action, that we will be better off as a society if we do, and that this innocent-seeming claim should not be seen as entirely non-controversial. Furthermore, I argue that historians and philosophers of science-at least some, but not all, historians and philosophers of science-can effectively join scientists in communicating science to a broader audience, and that this is essential to promoting effective science and technology policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-143
Number of pages11
JournalTechnology in Society
Volume24
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2002

Fingerprint

science
historian
Science and technology policy
Policy making
Join

Keywords

  • Congress
  • History and philosophy of science
  • Science policy
  • Scientific literacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Education
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Innocent reflections on science and technology policy. / Maienschein, Jane.

In: Technology in Society, Vol. 24, No. 1-2, 01.2002, p. 133-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4fe5165875674550aa52f3fd5662a105,
title = "Innocent reflections on science and technology policy",
abstract = "This essay explores one scholar's serendipitous wandering into the world of science and technology policy and suggests that such an idiosyncratic and opportunistic path is probably not really unusual. The paper explores why a historian/philosopher of science has something of value to say on the subject and why science and technology policy matters. I contend that we need more and a broader range of academics to think about science and technology policy and to engage in policy-making action, that we will be better off as a society if we do, and that this innocent-seeming claim should not be seen as entirely non-controversial. Furthermore, I argue that historians and philosophers of science-at least some, but not all, historians and philosophers of science-can effectively join scientists in communicating science to a broader audience, and that this is essential to promoting effective science and technology policy.",
keywords = "Congress, History and philosophy of science, Science policy, Scientific literacy",
author = "Jane Maienschein",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00049-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "133--143",
journal = "Technology in Society",
issn = "0160-791X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innocent reflections on science and technology policy

AU - Maienschein, Jane

PY - 2002/1

Y1 - 2002/1

N2 - This essay explores one scholar's serendipitous wandering into the world of science and technology policy and suggests that such an idiosyncratic and opportunistic path is probably not really unusual. The paper explores why a historian/philosopher of science has something of value to say on the subject and why science and technology policy matters. I contend that we need more and a broader range of academics to think about science and technology policy and to engage in policy-making action, that we will be better off as a society if we do, and that this innocent-seeming claim should not be seen as entirely non-controversial. Furthermore, I argue that historians and philosophers of science-at least some, but not all, historians and philosophers of science-can effectively join scientists in communicating science to a broader audience, and that this is essential to promoting effective science and technology policy.

AB - This essay explores one scholar's serendipitous wandering into the world of science and technology policy and suggests that such an idiosyncratic and opportunistic path is probably not really unusual. The paper explores why a historian/philosopher of science has something of value to say on the subject and why science and technology policy matters. I contend that we need more and a broader range of academics to think about science and technology policy and to engage in policy-making action, that we will be better off as a society if we do, and that this innocent-seeming claim should not be seen as entirely non-controversial. Furthermore, I argue that historians and philosophers of science-at least some, but not all, historians and philosophers of science-can effectively join scientists in communicating science to a broader audience, and that this is essential to promoting effective science and technology policy.

KW - Congress

KW - History and philosophy of science

KW - Science policy

KW - Scientific literacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=6444245417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=6444245417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00049-5

DO - 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00049-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:6444245417

VL - 24

SP - 133

EP - 143

JO - Technology in Society

JF - Technology in Society

SN - 0160-791X

IS - 1-2

ER -