Innocence at war

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    INTRODUCTION Some years after the Civil War, General William Tecumseh Sherman sought to disabuse military cadets of any sentimental pretense about their future profession: “I’ve seen cities and homes in ashes. I’ve seen thousands of men lying on the ground, their dead faces looking up at the skies. I tell you, war is Hell!" Sherman’s famous maxim conveyed the essential element of war as violence, with death and destruction as its direct incidents. This unromanticized view is necessary to understand not only the fundamental character of military combat, but also a principal reason for granting a space for law in war. From the codes of chivalry and the just war tradition, to modern treaties such as the Hague and Geneva Conventions, the law of war has sought to diminish the human suffering that inevitably accompanies armed conflict. The brunt of war is often borne by the “innocent” - defined for present purposes as individuals who are not involved in the hostilities (a.k.a., “civilians” or “non combatants”), as well as supposed participants in combat who, in fact, are free of any wrongdoing. A primary cause of their suffering is the lack of full and reliable information due to the chaos of combat, frontline constraints on time and resources, the use of stratagems by or against the enemy, and so on. As a result, “it may be difficult to discern whether a person is a combatant, a civilian, or a civilian taking a direct part in hostilities.” The distinction among these individuals can pose a question of life or death, and it certainly presents the opportunity for justice miscarried. While the civilian may not be intentionally targeted by military operations, as a general rule both the combatant and the civilian taking direct part in hostilities may be killed with impunity. They also may be detained for the war’s duration and subjected to trial and punishment for violating the law of war. This chapter is interested in the parallel between a particular understanding of the practice and law of war, and the developments in domestic criminal justice attributable to the Innocence Movement. As it turns out, many of the issues in domestic wrongful conviction cases are present in aggravated form in the context of war.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationWrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution
    Subtitle of host publicationTwenty-Five Years of Freeing the Innocent
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pages379-400
    Number of pages22
    ISBN (Electronic)9781316417119
    ISBN (Print)9781107129962
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

    Fingerprint

    law of war
    Military
    justice
    Geneva Convention
    death
    chaos
    civil war
    treaty
    penalty
    incident
    profession
    violence
    cause
    human being
    Law
    lack
    present
    resources

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Luna, E. (2017). Innocence at war. In Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution: Twenty-Five Years of Freeing the Innocent (pp. 379-400). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417119.020

    Innocence at war. / Luna, Erik.

    Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution: Twenty-Five Years of Freeing the Innocent. Cambridge University Press, 2017. p. 379-400.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Luna, E 2017, Innocence at war. in Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution: Twenty-Five Years of Freeing the Innocent. Cambridge University Press, pp. 379-400. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417119.020
    Luna E. Innocence at war. In Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution: Twenty-Five Years of Freeing the Innocent. Cambridge University Press. 2017. p. 379-400 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417119.020
    Luna, Erik. / Innocence at war. Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution: Twenty-Five Years of Freeing the Innocent. Cambridge University Press, 2017. pp. 379-400
    @inbook{60dfb9a6f5d44508a209cf0f8b26917a,
    title = "Innocence at war",
    abstract = "INTRODUCTION Some years after the Civil War, General William Tecumseh Sherman sought to disabuse military cadets of any sentimental pretense about their future profession: “I’ve seen cities and homes in ashes. I’ve seen thousands of men lying on the ground, their dead faces looking up at the skies. I tell you, war is Hell!{"} Sherman’s famous maxim conveyed the essential element of war as violence, with death and destruction as its direct incidents. This unromanticized view is necessary to understand not only the fundamental character of military combat, but also a principal reason for granting a space for law in war. From the codes of chivalry and the just war tradition, to modern treaties such as the Hague and Geneva Conventions, the law of war has sought to diminish the human suffering that inevitably accompanies armed conflict. The brunt of war is often borne by the “innocent” - defined for present purposes as individuals who are not involved in the hostilities (a.k.a., “civilians” or “non combatants”), as well as supposed participants in combat who, in fact, are free of any wrongdoing. A primary cause of their suffering is the lack of full and reliable information due to the chaos of combat, frontline constraints on time and resources, the use of stratagems by or against the enemy, and so on. As a result, “it may be difficult to discern whether a person is a combatant, a civilian, or a civilian taking a direct part in hostilities.” The distinction among these individuals can pose a question of life or death, and it certainly presents the opportunity for justice miscarried. While the civilian may not be intentionally targeted by military operations, as a general rule both the combatant and the civilian taking direct part in hostilities may be killed with impunity. They also may be detained for the war’s duration and subjected to trial and punishment for violating the law of war. This chapter is interested in the parallel between a particular understanding of the practice and law of war, and the developments in domestic criminal justice attributable to the Innocence Movement. As it turns out, many of the issues in domestic wrongful conviction cases are present in aggravated form in the context of war.",
    author = "Erik Luna",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/9781316417119.020",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9781107129962",
    pages = "379--400",
    booktitle = "Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Innocence at war

    AU - Luna, Erik

    PY - 2017/1/1

    Y1 - 2017/1/1

    N2 - INTRODUCTION Some years after the Civil War, General William Tecumseh Sherman sought to disabuse military cadets of any sentimental pretense about their future profession: “I’ve seen cities and homes in ashes. I’ve seen thousands of men lying on the ground, their dead faces looking up at the skies. I tell you, war is Hell!" Sherman’s famous maxim conveyed the essential element of war as violence, with death and destruction as its direct incidents. This unromanticized view is necessary to understand not only the fundamental character of military combat, but also a principal reason for granting a space for law in war. From the codes of chivalry and the just war tradition, to modern treaties such as the Hague and Geneva Conventions, the law of war has sought to diminish the human suffering that inevitably accompanies armed conflict. The brunt of war is often borne by the “innocent” - defined for present purposes as individuals who are not involved in the hostilities (a.k.a., “civilians” or “non combatants”), as well as supposed participants in combat who, in fact, are free of any wrongdoing. A primary cause of their suffering is the lack of full and reliable information due to the chaos of combat, frontline constraints on time and resources, the use of stratagems by or against the enemy, and so on. As a result, “it may be difficult to discern whether a person is a combatant, a civilian, or a civilian taking a direct part in hostilities.” The distinction among these individuals can pose a question of life or death, and it certainly presents the opportunity for justice miscarried. While the civilian may not be intentionally targeted by military operations, as a general rule both the combatant and the civilian taking direct part in hostilities may be killed with impunity. They also may be detained for the war’s duration and subjected to trial and punishment for violating the law of war. This chapter is interested in the parallel between a particular understanding of the practice and law of war, and the developments in domestic criminal justice attributable to the Innocence Movement. As it turns out, many of the issues in domestic wrongful conviction cases are present in aggravated form in the context of war.

    AB - INTRODUCTION Some years after the Civil War, General William Tecumseh Sherman sought to disabuse military cadets of any sentimental pretense about their future profession: “I’ve seen cities and homes in ashes. I’ve seen thousands of men lying on the ground, their dead faces looking up at the skies. I tell you, war is Hell!" Sherman’s famous maxim conveyed the essential element of war as violence, with death and destruction as its direct incidents. This unromanticized view is necessary to understand not only the fundamental character of military combat, but also a principal reason for granting a space for law in war. From the codes of chivalry and the just war tradition, to modern treaties such as the Hague and Geneva Conventions, the law of war has sought to diminish the human suffering that inevitably accompanies armed conflict. The brunt of war is often borne by the “innocent” - defined for present purposes as individuals who are not involved in the hostilities (a.k.a., “civilians” or “non combatants”), as well as supposed participants in combat who, in fact, are free of any wrongdoing. A primary cause of their suffering is the lack of full and reliable information due to the chaos of combat, frontline constraints on time and resources, the use of stratagems by or against the enemy, and so on. As a result, “it may be difficult to discern whether a person is a combatant, a civilian, or a civilian taking a direct part in hostilities.” The distinction among these individuals can pose a question of life or death, and it certainly presents the opportunity for justice miscarried. While the civilian may not be intentionally targeted by military operations, as a general rule both the combatant and the civilian taking direct part in hostilities may be killed with impunity. They also may be detained for the war’s duration and subjected to trial and punishment for violating the law of war. This chapter is interested in the parallel between a particular understanding of the practice and law of war, and the developments in domestic criminal justice attributable to the Innocence Movement. As it turns out, many of the issues in domestic wrongful conviction cases are present in aggravated form in the context of war.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048421559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048421559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/9781316417119.020

    DO - 10.1017/9781316417119.020

    M3 - Chapter

    AN - SCOPUS:85048421559

    SN - 9781107129962

    SP - 379

    EP - 400

    BT - Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution

    PB - Cambridge University Press

    ER -