TY - JOUR
T1 - Inmate support for “flat-time” sentencing and related proposals
T2 - A research note
AU - Holbert, Fred
AU - Webb, Vincent
PY - 1978/1/1
Y1 - 1978/1/1
N2 - Currently, a good deal of debate about the use of determinate sentences and attendant proposals is taking place within academic, legislative, and professional circles. This study examines these proposals in terms of the perceptions of prison inmates. Male inmates in a Plains State correctional institution were surveyed in order to determine the extent to which they support proposals for “flat-time” sentencing, “day to day” good time, voluntary treatment, and the elimination of parole. The majority of inmates supported all four proposals, although substantial variation in the amount of support exists across proposals. Variables that serve as indicators of inmate “self-interest” and inmate “experience” provide very little explanation for the variation in inmate responses. Iffuture behavior is consistent with the self-reported data presented in the present study, only limited negative reaction by inmates to the actual implementation of these proposals should be expected.
AB - Currently, a good deal of debate about the use of determinate sentences and attendant proposals is taking place within academic, legislative, and professional circles. This study examines these proposals in terms of the perceptions of prison inmates. Male inmates in a Plains State correctional institution were surveyed in order to determine the extent to which they support proposals for “flat-time” sentencing, “day to day” good time, voluntary treatment, and the elimination of parole. The majority of inmates supported all four proposals, although substantial variation in the amount of support exists across proposals. Variables that serve as indicators of inmate “self-interest” and inmate “experience” provide very little explanation for the variation in inmate responses. Iffuture behavior is consistent with the self-reported data presented in the present study, only limited negative reaction by inmates to the actual implementation of these proposals should be expected.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965572016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965572016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/073401687800300112
DO - 10.1177/073401687800300112
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84965572016
SN - 0734-0168
VL - 3
SP - 101
EP - 106
JO - Criminal Justice Review
JF - Criminal Justice Review
IS - 1
ER -