Inmate Misconduct and the Institutional Capacity for Control

Marie L. Griffin, John Hepburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The social order of a prison arises from the combined effects of the prison's institutional capacity for control and the effectiveness of prison management. Prior research suggests that the criminogenic characteristics of the inmate population, the security level of the prison, and the prison environment are three structural characteristics of prisons that define each prison's institutional capacity for control, as reflected in the aggregate-level measures of inmate misconduct, and prison environment is expected to moderate the effects of inmate population characteristics on inmate misconduct. This study of 50 state prisons for men provides support for the hypothesized direct effects of institutional capacity for control on the level of violent and nonviolent inmate misconduct and for the contextual effect of prison environment. The findings are discussed in terms of the management environment created among prisons by variations in the institutional capacity for control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)270-288
Number of pages19
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Prisons
correctional institution
Population Characteristics
social order
management

Keywords

  • administrative control
  • prison environment
  • prison management
  • prison misconduct
  • prison violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychology(all)
  • Law

Cite this

Inmate Misconduct and the Institutional Capacity for Control. / Griffin, Marie L.; Hepburn, John.

In: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 40, No. 3, 03.2013, p. 270-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b6e3a1bb0464b798744413c5a083186,
title = "Inmate Misconduct and the Institutional Capacity for Control",
abstract = "The social order of a prison arises from the combined effects of the prison's institutional capacity for control and the effectiveness of prison management. Prior research suggests that the criminogenic characteristics of the inmate population, the security level of the prison, and the prison environment are three structural characteristics of prisons that define each prison's institutional capacity for control, as reflected in the aggregate-level measures of inmate misconduct, and prison environment is expected to moderate the effects of inmate population characteristics on inmate misconduct. This study of 50 state prisons for men provides support for the hypothesized direct effects of institutional capacity for control on the level of violent and nonviolent inmate misconduct and for the contextual effect of prison environment. The findings are discussed in terms of the management environment created among prisons by variations in the institutional capacity for control.",
keywords = "administrative control, prison environment, prison management, prison misconduct, prison violence",
author = "Griffin, {Marie L.} and John Hepburn",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0093854812457920",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "270--288",
journal = "Criminal Justice and Behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inmate Misconduct and the Institutional Capacity for Control

AU - Griffin, Marie L.

AU - Hepburn, John

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The social order of a prison arises from the combined effects of the prison's institutional capacity for control and the effectiveness of prison management. Prior research suggests that the criminogenic characteristics of the inmate population, the security level of the prison, and the prison environment are three structural characteristics of prisons that define each prison's institutional capacity for control, as reflected in the aggregate-level measures of inmate misconduct, and prison environment is expected to moderate the effects of inmate population characteristics on inmate misconduct. This study of 50 state prisons for men provides support for the hypothesized direct effects of institutional capacity for control on the level of violent and nonviolent inmate misconduct and for the contextual effect of prison environment. The findings are discussed in terms of the management environment created among prisons by variations in the institutional capacity for control.

AB - The social order of a prison arises from the combined effects of the prison's institutional capacity for control and the effectiveness of prison management. Prior research suggests that the criminogenic characteristics of the inmate population, the security level of the prison, and the prison environment are three structural characteristics of prisons that define each prison's institutional capacity for control, as reflected in the aggregate-level measures of inmate misconduct, and prison environment is expected to moderate the effects of inmate population characteristics on inmate misconduct. This study of 50 state prisons for men provides support for the hypothesized direct effects of institutional capacity for control on the level of violent and nonviolent inmate misconduct and for the contextual effect of prison environment. The findings are discussed in terms of the management environment created among prisons by variations in the institutional capacity for control.

KW - administrative control

KW - prison environment

KW - prison management

KW - prison misconduct

KW - prison violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873660207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873660207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093854812457920

DO - 10.1177/0093854812457920

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873660207

VL - 40

SP - 270

EP - 288

JO - Criminal Justice and Behavior

JF - Criminal Justice and Behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 3

ER -