Influence of Text Structure on Learning Counterintuitive Physics Concepts

Barbara Guzzetti, Wayne O. Williams, Stephanie A. Skeels, Shwu Ming Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the influences of text structure on students' conceptual change. Case studies were conducted of three sections of physics (Physical World, Physics, and Honors Physics) for 8 months of an academic year. Qualitative data (including observation field notes, interviews, videotapes, audiotapes, and questionnaires) were analyzed from the perspective of grounded theory by constant comparison through the framework of social constructivism. Results showed that individuals used refutational text to change their alternative conceptions, find support for their scientific preconceptions, gain the language necessary to discuss their ideas, and acquire new concepts. We also found instances, however, when students ignored the text and persisted with their alternative conception, or when students found support for their nonscientific ideas from refutational text. In these cases, we found that either the refutation was not direct enough to be effective, or students' reading strategies were insufficient to facilitate conceptual change. In investigating the power of refutational text, we found that refutational text does cause cognitive conflict. We also discovered that while cognitive conflict may be necessary for conceptual change to occur, it is not sufficient. Although refutational text is effective on the average for groups of students, it will need to be supplemented by discussion for individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-719
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Research in Science Teaching
Volume34
Issue number7
StatePublished - Sep 1997

Fingerprint

physics
Physics
Students
learning
student
constructivism
grounded theory
honor
cause
questionnaire
interview
language
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Influence of Text Structure on Learning Counterintuitive Physics Concepts. / Guzzetti, Barbara; Williams, Wayne O.; Skeels, Stephanie A.; Wu, Shwu Ming.

In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 34, No. 7, 09.1997, p. 701-719.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Guzzetti, Barbara ; Williams, Wayne O. ; Skeels, Stephanie A. ; Wu, Shwu Ming. / Influence of Text Structure on Learning Counterintuitive Physics Concepts. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1997 ; Vol. 34, No. 7. pp. 701-719.
@article{45fe8041ebdf49099ab4aedc8662e014,
title = "Influence of Text Structure on Learning Counterintuitive Physics Concepts",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to explore the influences of text structure on students' conceptual change. Case studies were conducted of three sections of physics (Physical World, Physics, and Honors Physics) for 8 months of an academic year. Qualitative data (including observation field notes, interviews, videotapes, audiotapes, and questionnaires) were analyzed from the perspective of grounded theory by constant comparison through the framework of social constructivism. Results showed that individuals used refutational text to change their alternative conceptions, find support for their scientific preconceptions, gain the language necessary to discuss their ideas, and acquire new concepts. We also found instances, however, when students ignored the text and persisted with their alternative conception, or when students found support for their nonscientific ideas from refutational text. In these cases, we found that either the refutation was not direct enough to be effective, or students' reading strategies were insufficient to facilitate conceptual change. In investigating the power of refutational text, we found that refutational text does cause cognitive conflict. We also discovered that while cognitive conflict may be necessary for conceptual change to occur, it is not sufficient. Although refutational text is effective on the average for groups of students, it will need to be supplemented by discussion for individuals.",
author = "Barbara Guzzetti and Williams, {Wayne O.} and Skeels, {Stephanie A.} and Wu, {Shwu Ming}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "701--719",
journal = "Journal of Research in Science Teaching",
issn = "0022-4308",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of Text Structure on Learning Counterintuitive Physics Concepts

AU - Guzzetti, Barbara

AU - Williams, Wayne O.

AU - Skeels, Stephanie A.

AU - Wu, Shwu Ming

PY - 1997/9

Y1 - 1997/9

N2 - The purpose of this study was to explore the influences of text structure on students' conceptual change. Case studies were conducted of three sections of physics (Physical World, Physics, and Honors Physics) for 8 months of an academic year. Qualitative data (including observation field notes, interviews, videotapes, audiotapes, and questionnaires) were analyzed from the perspective of grounded theory by constant comparison through the framework of social constructivism. Results showed that individuals used refutational text to change their alternative conceptions, find support for their scientific preconceptions, gain the language necessary to discuss their ideas, and acquire new concepts. We also found instances, however, when students ignored the text and persisted with their alternative conception, or when students found support for their nonscientific ideas from refutational text. In these cases, we found that either the refutation was not direct enough to be effective, or students' reading strategies were insufficient to facilitate conceptual change. In investigating the power of refutational text, we found that refutational text does cause cognitive conflict. We also discovered that while cognitive conflict may be necessary for conceptual change to occur, it is not sufficient. Although refutational text is effective on the average for groups of students, it will need to be supplemented by discussion for individuals.

AB - The purpose of this study was to explore the influences of text structure on students' conceptual change. Case studies were conducted of three sections of physics (Physical World, Physics, and Honors Physics) for 8 months of an academic year. Qualitative data (including observation field notes, interviews, videotapes, audiotapes, and questionnaires) were analyzed from the perspective of grounded theory by constant comparison through the framework of social constructivism. Results showed that individuals used refutational text to change their alternative conceptions, find support for their scientific preconceptions, gain the language necessary to discuss their ideas, and acquire new concepts. We also found instances, however, when students ignored the text and persisted with their alternative conception, or when students found support for their nonscientific ideas from refutational text. In these cases, we found that either the refutation was not direct enough to be effective, or students' reading strategies were insufficient to facilitate conceptual change. In investigating the power of refutational text, we found that refutational text does cause cognitive conflict. We also discovered that while cognitive conflict may be necessary for conceptual change to occur, it is not sufficient. Although refutational text is effective on the average for groups of students, it will need to be supplemented by discussion for individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038135693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038135693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0038135693

VL - 34

SP - 701

EP - 719

JO - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

JF - Journal of Research in Science Teaching

SN - 0022-4308

IS - 7

ER -