Infectious disease and group size: More than just a numbers game

Charles L. Nunn, Ferenc Jordan, Collin M. Mc-Cabe, Jennifer L. Verdolin, Jennifer Fewell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    48 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Increased risk of infectious disease is assumed to be a major cost of group living, yet empirical evidence for this effect is mixed. We studied whether larger social groups are more subdivided structurally. If so, the social subdivisions that form in larger groups may act as barriers to the spread of infection, weakening the association between group size and infectious disease. To investigate this ‘social bottleneck’ hypothesis, we examined the association between group size and four network structure metrics in 43 vertebrate and invertebrate species. We focused on metrics involving modularity, clustering, distance and centralization. In a meta-analysis of intraspecific variation in social networks, modularity showed positive associations with network size, with a weaker but still positive effect in cross-species analyses. Network distance also showed a positive association with group size when using intraspecific variation. We then used a theoretical model to explore the effects of subgrouping relative to other effects that influence disease spread in socially structured populations. Outbreaks reached higher prevalence when groups were larger, but subgrouping reduced prevalence. Subgrouping also acted as a ‘brake’ on disease spread between groups.We suggest research directions to understand the conditions under which larger groups become more subdivided, and to devise new metrics that account for subgrouping when investigating the links between sociality and infectious disease risk.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
    Volume370
    Issue number1669
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 26 2015

    Fingerprint

    infectious disease
    group size
    infectious diseases
    Communicable Diseases
    disease spread
    intraspecific variation
    social networks
    Invertebrates
    meta-analysis
    Social Support
    centralization
    Disease Outbreaks
    Cluster Analysis
    Vertebrates
    Meta-Analysis
    social network
    Theoretical Models
    invertebrates
    vertebrates
    Economics

    Keywords

    • Comparative analysis
    • Infectious disease
    • Meta-analysis
    • Social network
    • Social structure
    • Sociality

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
    • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

    Cite this

    Infectious disease and group size : More than just a numbers game. / Nunn, Charles L.; Jordan, Ferenc; Mc-Cabe, Collin M.; Verdolin, Jennifer L.; Fewell, Jennifer.

    In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 370, No. 1669, 26.05.2015.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Nunn, Charles L. ; Jordan, Ferenc ; Mc-Cabe, Collin M. ; Verdolin, Jennifer L. ; Fewell, Jennifer. / Infectious disease and group size : More than just a numbers game. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015 ; Vol. 370, No. 1669.
    @article{69e245ab498b4c3c95e4a234af4472fb,
    title = "Infectious disease and group size: More than just a numbers game",
    abstract = "Increased risk of infectious disease is assumed to be a major cost of group living, yet empirical evidence for this effect is mixed. We studied whether larger social groups are more subdivided structurally. If so, the social subdivisions that form in larger groups may act as barriers to the spread of infection, weakening the association between group size and infectious disease. To investigate this ‘social bottleneck’ hypothesis, we examined the association between group size and four network structure metrics in 43 vertebrate and invertebrate species. We focused on metrics involving modularity, clustering, distance and centralization. In a meta-analysis of intraspecific variation in social networks, modularity showed positive associations with network size, with a weaker but still positive effect in cross-species analyses. Network distance also showed a positive association with group size when using intraspecific variation. We then used a theoretical model to explore the effects of subgrouping relative to other effects that influence disease spread in socially structured populations. Outbreaks reached higher prevalence when groups were larger, but subgrouping reduced prevalence. Subgrouping also acted as a ‘brake’ on disease spread between groups.We suggest research directions to understand the conditions under which larger groups become more subdivided, and to devise new metrics that account for subgrouping when investigating the links between sociality and infectious disease risk.",
    keywords = "Comparative analysis, Infectious disease, Meta-analysis, Social network, Social structure, Sociality",
    author = "Nunn, {Charles L.} and Ferenc Jordan and Mc-Cabe, {Collin M.} and Verdolin, {Jennifer L.} and Jennifer Fewell",
    year = "2015",
    month = "5",
    day = "26",
    doi = "10.1098/rstb.2014.0111",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "370",
    journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
    issn = "0800-4622",
    publisher = "Royal Society of London",
    number = "1669",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Infectious disease and group size

    T2 - More than just a numbers game

    AU - Nunn, Charles L.

    AU - Jordan, Ferenc

    AU - Mc-Cabe, Collin M.

    AU - Verdolin, Jennifer L.

    AU - Fewell, Jennifer

    PY - 2015/5/26

    Y1 - 2015/5/26

    N2 - Increased risk of infectious disease is assumed to be a major cost of group living, yet empirical evidence for this effect is mixed. We studied whether larger social groups are more subdivided structurally. If so, the social subdivisions that form in larger groups may act as barriers to the spread of infection, weakening the association between group size and infectious disease. To investigate this ‘social bottleneck’ hypothesis, we examined the association between group size and four network structure metrics in 43 vertebrate and invertebrate species. We focused on metrics involving modularity, clustering, distance and centralization. In a meta-analysis of intraspecific variation in social networks, modularity showed positive associations with network size, with a weaker but still positive effect in cross-species analyses. Network distance also showed a positive association with group size when using intraspecific variation. We then used a theoretical model to explore the effects of subgrouping relative to other effects that influence disease spread in socially structured populations. Outbreaks reached higher prevalence when groups were larger, but subgrouping reduced prevalence. Subgrouping also acted as a ‘brake’ on disease spread between groups.We suggest research directions to understand the conditions under which larger groups become more subdivided, and to devise new metrics that account for subgrouping when investigating the links between sociality and infectious disease risk.

    AB - Increased risk of infectious disease is assumed to be a major cost of group living, yet empirical evidence for this effect is mixed. We studied whether larger social groups are more subdivided structurally. If so, the social subdivisions that form in larger groups may act as barriers to the spread of infection, weakening the association between group size and infectious disease. To investigate this ‘social bottleneck’ hypothesis, we examined the association between group size and four network structure metrics in 43 vertebrate and invertebrate species. We focused on metrics involving modularity, clustering, distance and centralization. In a meta-analysis of intraspecific variation in social networks, modularity showed positive associations with network size, with a weaker but still positive effect in cross-species analyses. Network distance also showed a positive association with group size when using intraspecific variation. We then used a theoretical model to explore the effects of subgrouping relative to other effects that influence disease spread in socially structured populations. Outbreaks reached higher prevalence when groups were larger, but subgrouping reduced prevalence. Subgrouping also acted as a ‘brake’ on disease spread between groups.We suggest research directions to understand the conditions under which larger groups become more subdivided, and to devise new metrics that account for subgrouping when investigating the links between sociality and infectious disease risk.

    KW - Comparative analysis

    KW - Infectious disease

    KW - Meta-analysis

    KW - Social network

    KW - Social structure

    KW - Sociality

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927739357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927739357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2014.0111

    DO - 10.1098/rstb.2014.0111

    M3 - Article

    VL - 370

    JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

    JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

    SN - 0800-4622

    IS - 1669

    ER -