Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits

Chelsea N. Cook, Thiago Mosqueiro, Colin S. Brent, Cahit Ozturk, Juergen Gadau, Noa Pinter-Wollman, Brian Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Animals must effectively balance the time they spend exploring the environment for new resources and exploiting them. One way that social animals accomplish this balance is by allocating these two tasks to different individuals. In honeybees, foraging is divided between scouts, which tend to explore the landscape for novel resources, and recruits, which tend to exploit these resources. Exploring the variation in cognitive and physiological mechanisms of foraging behaviour will provide a deeper understanding of how the division of labour is regulated in social insect societies. Here, we uncover how honeybee foraging behaviour may be shaped by predispositions in performance of latent inhibition (LI), which is a form of non-associative learning by which individuals learn to ignore familiar information. We compared LI between scouts and recruits, hypothesizing that differences in learning would correlate with differences in foraging behaviour. Scouts seek out and encounter many new odours while locating novel resources, while recruits continuously forage from the same resource, even as its quality degrades. We found that scouts show stronger LI than recruits, possibly reflecting their need to discriminate forage quality. We also found that scouts have significantly elevated tyramine compared to recruits. Furthermore, after associative odour training, recruits have significantly diminished octopamine in their brains compared to scouts. These results suggest that individual variation in learning behaviour shapes the phenotypic behavioural differences between different types of honeybee foragers. These differences in turn have important consequences for how honeybee colonies interact with their environment. Uncovering the proximate mechanisms that influence individual variation in foraging behaviour is crucial for understanding the ecological context in which societies evolve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)236-246
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
Volume88
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Keywords

  • exploration–exploitation trade-off
  • foraging
  • honeybee
  • latent inhibition
  • non-associative learning
  • scout
  • tyramine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this