Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits

Chelsea N. Cook, Thiago Mosqueiro, Colin S. Brent, Cahit Ozturk, Juergen Gadau, Noa Pinter-Wollman, Brian Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Animals must effectively balance the time they spend exploring the environment for new resources and exploiting them. One way that social animals accomplish this balance is by allocating these two tasks to different individuals. In honeybees, foraging is divided between scouts, which tend to explore the landscape for novel resources, and recruits, which tend to exploit these resources. Exploring the variation in cognitive and physiological mechanisms of foraging behaviour will provide a deeper understanding of how the division of labour is regulated in social insect societies. Here, we uncover how honeybee foraging behaviour may be shaped by predispositions in performance of latent inhibition (LI), which is a form of non-associative learning by which individuals learn to ignore familiar information. We compared LI between scouts and recruits, hypothesizing that differences in learning would correlate with differences in foraging behaviour. Scouts seek out and encounter many new odours while locating novel resources, while recruits continuously forage from the same resource, even as its quality degrades. We found that scouts show stronger LI than recruits, possibly reflecting their need to discriminate forage quality. We also found that scouts have significantly elevated tyramine compared to recruits. Furthermore, after associative odour training, recruits have significantly diminished octopamine in their brains compared to scouts. These results suggest that individual variation in learning behaviour shapes the phenotypic behavioural differences between different types of honeybee foragers. These differences in turn have important consequences for how honeybee colonies interact with their environment. Uncovering the proximate mechanisms that influence individual variation in foraging behaviour is crucial for understanding the ecological context in which societies evolve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

honeybee
biogenic amines
honey bees
foraging behavior
learning
foraging
resource
individual variation
odor
forage
odors
octopamine
insect colonies
polyethism
social insect
honey bee colonies
tyramine
animal
labor division
social insects

Keywords

  • exploration–exploitation trade-off
  • foraging
  • honeybee
  • latent inhibition
  • non-associative learning
  • scout
  • tyramine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits. / Cook, Chelsea N.; Mosqueiro, Thiago; Brent, Colin S.; Ozturk, Cahit; Gadau, Juergen; Pinter-Wollman, Noa; Smith, Brian.

In: Journal of Animal Ecology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8544e3b292f54e9f9b3577d39944a521,
title = "Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits",
abstract = "Animals must effectively balance the time they spend exploring the environment for new resources and exploiting them. One way that social animals accomplish this balance is by allocating these two tasks to different individuals. In honeybees, foraging is divided between scouts, which tend to explore the landscape for novel resources, and recruits, which tend to exploit these resources. Exploring the variation in cognitive and physiological mechanisms of foraging behaviour will provide a deeper understanding of how the division of labour is regulated in social insect societies. Here, we uncover how honeybee foraging behaviour may be shaped by predispositions in performance of latent inhibition (LI), which is a form of non-associative learning by which individuals learn to ignore familiar information. We compared LI between scouts and recruits, hypothesizing that differences in learning would correlate with differences in foraging behaviour. Scouts seek out and encounter many new odours while locating novel resources, while recruits continuously forage from the same resource, even as its quality degrades. We found that scouts show stronger LI than recruits, possibly reflecting their need to discriminate forage quality. We also found that scouts have significantly elevated tyramine compared to recruits. Furthermore, after associative odour training, recruits have significantly diminished octopamine in their brains compared to scouts. These results suggest that individual variation in learning behaviour shapes the phenotypic behavioural differences between different types of honeybee foragers. These differences in turn have important consequences for how honeybee colonies interact with their environment. Uncovering the proximate mechanisms that influence individual variation in foraging behaviour is crucial for understanding the ecological context in which societies evolve.",
keywords = "exploration–exploitation trade-off, foraging, honeybee, latent inhibition, non-associative learning, scout, tyramine",
author = "Cook, {Chelsea N.} and Thiago Mosqueiro and Brent, {Colin S.} and Cahit Ozturk and Juergen Gadau and Noa Pinter-Wollman and Brian Smith",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2656.12911",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
issn = "0021-8790",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits

AU - Cook, Chelsea N.

AU - Mosqueiro, Thiago

AU - Brent, Colin S.

AU - Ozturk, Cahit

AU - Gadau, Juergen

AU - Pinter-Wollman, Noa

AU - Smith, Brian

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Animals must effectively balance the time they spend exploring the environment for new resources and exploiting them. One way that social animals accomplish this balance is by allocating these two tasks to different individuals. In honeybees, foraging is divided between scouts, which tend to explore the landscape for novel resources, and recruits, which tend to exploit these resources. Exploring the variation in cognitive and physiological mechanisms of foraging behaviour will provide a deeper understanding of how the division of labour is regulated in social insect societies. Here, we uncover how honeybee foraging behaviour may be shaped by predispositions in performance of latent inhibition (LI), which is a form of non-associative learning by which individuals learn to ignore familiar information. We compared LI between scouts and recruits, hypothesizing that differences in learning would correlate with differences in foraging behaviour. Scouts seek out and encounter many new odours while locating novel resources, while recruits continuously forage from the same resource, even as its quality degrades. We found that scouts show stronger LI than recruits, possibly reflecting their need to discriminate forage quality. We also found that scouts have significantly elevated tyramine compared to recruits. Furthermore, after associative odour training, recruits have significantly diminished octopamine in their brains compared to scouts. These results suggest that individual variation in learning behaviour shapes the phenotypic behavioural differences between different types of honeybee foragers. These differences in turn have important consequences for how honeybee colonies interact with their environment. Uncovering the proximate mechanisms that influence individual variation in foraging behaviour is crucial for understanding the ecological context in which societies evolve.

AB - Animals must effectively balance the time they spend exploring the environment for new resources and exploiting them. One way that social animals accomplish this balance is by allocating these two tasks to different individuals. In honeybees, foraging is divided between scouts, which tend to explore the landscape for novel resources, and recruits, which tend to exploit these resources. Exploring the variation in cognitive and physiological mechanisms of foraging behaviour will provide a deeper understanding of how the division of labour is regulated in social insect societies. Here, we uncover how honeybee foraging behaviour may be shaped by predispositions in performance of latent inhibition (LI), which is a form of non-associative learning by which individuals learn to ignore familiar information. We compared LI between scouts and recruits, hypothesizing that differences in learning would correlate with differences in foraging behaviour. Scouts seek out and encounter many new odours while locating novel resources, while recruits continuously forage from the same resource, even as its quality degrades. We found that scouts show stronger LI than recruits, possibly reflecting their need to discriminate forage quality. We also found that scouts have significantly elevated tyramine compared to recruits. Furthermore, after associative odour training, recruits have significantly diminished octopamine in their brains compared to scouts. These results suggest that individual variation in learning behaviour shapes the phenotypic behavioural differences between different types of honeybee foragers. These differences in turn have important consequences for how honeybee colonies interact with their environment. Uncovering the proximate mechanisms that influence individual variation in foraging behaviour is crucial for understanding the ecological context in which societies evolve.

KW - exploration–exploitation trade-off

KW - foraging

KW - honeybee

KW - latent inhibition

KW - non-associative learning

KW - scout

KW - tyramine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055951091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055951091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2656.12911

DO - 10.1111/1365-2656.12911

M3 - Article

C2 - 30289166

AN - SCOPUS:85055951091

JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

SN - 0021-8790

ER -