Individual Differences and Changes in Nonverbal Behavior: Unmasking the Changing Faces of Deception

James Stiff, Steven Corman, Bob Krizek, Eric Snider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Investigations of deceptive communication have examined a number of nonverbal behaviors as potential correlates of deception; however, reviews of this literature reveal only a handful of behaviors that consistently distinguish deceptive messages from truthful ones. Procedural limitations apparent in some of these studies and an underspecification of individual and discursive factors that affect the production of nonverbal behavior were offered as potential explanations for these findings. The present study sought to reduce the procedural limitations of some prior studies and employed time series analysis to model individual and discursive influences on the response latencies of deceivers and truthtellers. A decay impulse model provided a good description of the data. This model reflects a decaying series of momentary increases (spikes) in the response latency series that were associated with an interviewer's critical questions, and the size of these spikes decreased with each successive critical question. Message veracity and self-monitoring were two variables that combined to affect the fit of the decay impulse model. Implications of these findings are discussed along with suggestions for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)555-581
Number of pages27
JournalCommunication Research
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Time series analysis
time series analysis
monitoring
Unmasking
Individual Differences
Nonverbal Behavior
Deception
Monitoring
communication
Communication
interview
Discursive
Decay
Latency
Impulse
Procedural
Self-monitoring
Time Series Analysis
Underspecification
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Individual Differences and Changes in Nonverbal Behavior : Unmasking the Changing Faces of Deception. / Stiff, James; Corman, Steven; Krizek, Bob; Snider, Eric.

In: Communication Research, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1994, p. 555-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2978a01f80e44d71894a1427c2882a6e,
title = "Individual Differences and Changes in Nonverbal Behavior: Unmasking the Changing Faces of Deception",
abstract = "Investigations of deceptive communication have examined a number of nonverbal behaviors as potential correlates of deception; however, reviews of this literature reveal only a handful of behaviors that consistently distinguish deceptive messages from truthful ones. Procedural limitations apparent in some of these studies and an underspecification of individual and discursive factors that affect the production of nonverbal behavior were offered as potential explanations for these findings. The present study sought to reduce the procedural limitations of some prior studies and employed time series analysis to model individual and discursive influences on the response latencies of deceivers and truthtellers. A decay impulse model provided a good description of the data. This model reflects a decaying series of momentary increases (spikes) in the response latency series that were associated with an interviewer's critical questions, and the size of these spikes decreased with each successive critical question. Message veracity and self-monitoring were two variables that combined to affect the fit of the decay impulse model. Implications of these findings are discussed along with suggestions for future research.",
author = "James Stiff and Steven Corman and Bob Krizek and Eric Snider",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1177/009365094021005001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "555--581",
journal = "Communication Research",
issn = "0093-6502",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual Differences and Changes in Nonverbal Behavior

T2 - Unmasking the Changing Faces of Deception

AU - Stiff, James

AU - Corman, Steven

AU - Krizek, Bob

AU - Snider, Eric

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Investigations of deceptive communication have examined a number of nonverbal behaviors as potential correlates of deception; however, reviews of this literature reveal only a handful of behaviors that consistently distinguish deceptive messages from truthful ones. Procedural limitations apparent in some of these studies and an underspecification of individual and discursive factors that affect the production of nonverbal behavior were offered as potential explanations for these findings. The present study sought to reduce the procedural limitations of some prior studies and employed time series analysis to model individual and discursive influences on the response latencies of deceivers and truthtellers. A decay impulse model provided a good description of the data. This model reflects a decaying series of momentary increases (spikes) in the response latency series that were associated with an interviewer's critical questions, and the size of these spikes decreased with each successive critical question. Message veracity and self-monitoring were two variables that combined to affect the fit of the decay impulse model. Implications of these findings are discussed along with suggestions for future research.

AB - Investigations of deceptive communication have examined a number of nonverbal behaviors as potential correlates of deception; however, reviews of this literature reveal only a handful of behaviors that consistently distinguish deceptive messages from truthful ones. Procedural limitations apparent in some of these studies and an underspecification of individual and discursive factors that affect the production of nonverbal behavior were offered as potential explanations for these findings. The present study sought to reduce the procedural limitations of some prior studies and employed time series analysis to model individual and discursive influences on the response latencies of deceivers and truthtellers. A decay impulse model provided a good description of the data. This model reflects a decaying series of momentary increases (spikes) in the response latency series that were associated with an interviewer's critical questions, and the size of these spikes decreased with each successive critical question. Message veracity and self-monitoring were two variables that combined to affect the fit of the decay impulse model. Implications of these findings are discussed along with suggestions for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965395372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965395372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/009365094021005001

DO - 10.1177/009365094021005001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84965395372

VL - 21

SP - 555

EP - 581

JO - Communication Research

JF - Communication Research

SN - 0093-6502

IS - 5

ER -