Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis

E. B. Mallon, Stephen Pratt, N. R. Franks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

160 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social insect colonies possess remarkable abilities to select the best among several courses of action. In populous societies with highly efficient recruitment behaviour, decision-making is distributed across many individuals, each acting on limited local information with appropriate decision rules. To investigate the degree to which small societies with less efficient recruitment can also employ distributed decision-making, we studied nest site selection in Leptothorax albipennis. Colonies were found to make sophisticated choices, taking into account not only the intrinsic qualities of each site, but also its value relative to the available options. In choices between two sites, individual ants were able to visit both sites, compare them and choose the better one. However, most ants encountered only one site in the course of an emigration. These poorly informed ants also contributed to the colony's decision, because their probability of initiating recruitment to a site depended on its quality. This led to shorter latencies between discovery and recruitment to a superior site, and so created greater amplification via positive feedback of the population at the better site. In short, these small colonies make use of a distributed mechanism of information processing, but also take advantage of direct decision-making by well-informed individuals. The latter feature may in part stem from the limitations of their social structure, but may also reflect the stringent demand for unanimous decisions by house-hunting colonies of any size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)352-359
Number of pages8
JournalBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Leptothorax
Ants
nest site
site selection
nesting sites
ant
decision making
Decision Making
Formicidae
Aptitude
Emigration and Immigration
Automatic Data Processing
insect colonies
Insects
social insects
social structure
social insect
information processing
emigration
hunting

Keywords

  • Ants
  • Communication
  • Decentralised control
  • Decision-making
  • Social insects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. / Mallon, E. B.; Pratt, Stephen; Franks, N. R.

In: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2001, p. 352-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{604e13fa17814c82b43659417da3e9a0,
title = "Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis",
abstract = "Social insect colonies possess remarkable abilities to select the best among several courses of action. In populous societies with highly efficient recruitment behaviour, decision-making is distributed across many individuals, each acting on limited local information with appropriate decision rules. To investigate the degree to which small societies with less efficient recruitment can also employ distributed decision-making, we studied nest site selection in Leptothorax albipennis. Colonies were found to make sophisticated choices, taking into account not only the intrinsic qualities of each site, but also its value relative to the available options. In choices between two sites, individual ants were able to visit both sites, compare them and choose the better one. However, most ants encountered only one site in the course of an emigration. These poorly informed ants also contributed to the colony's decision, because their probability of initiating recruitment to a site depended on its quality. This led to shorter latencies between discovery and recruitment to a superior site, and so created greater amplification via positive feedback of the population at the better site. In short, these small colonies make use of a distributed mechanism of information processing, but also take advantage of direct decision-making by well-informed individuals. The latter feature may in part stem from the limitations of their social structure, but may also reflect the stringent demand for unanimous decisions by house-hunting colonies of any size.",
keywords = "Ants, Communication, Decentralised control, Decision-making, Social insects",
author = "Mallon, {E. B.} and Stephen Pratt and Franks, {N. R.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1007/s002650100377",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "352--359",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology",
issn = "0340-5443",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis

AU - Mallon, E. B.

AU - Pratt, Stephen

AU - Franks, N. R.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Social insect colonies possess remarkable abilities to select the best among several courses of action. In populous societies with highly efficient recruitment behaviour, decision-making is distributed across many individuals, each acting on limited local information with appropriate decision rules. To investigate the degree to which small societies with less efficient recruitment can also employ distributed decision-making, we studied nest site selection in Leptothorax albipennis. Colonies were found to make sophisticated choices, taking into account not only the intrinsic qualities of each site, but also its value relative to the available options. In choices between two sites, individual ants were able to visit both sites, compare them and choose the better one. However, most ants encountered only one site in the course of an emigration. These poorly informed ants also contributed to the colony's decision, because their probability of initiating recruitment to a site depended on its quality. This led to shorter latencies between discovery and recruitment to a superior site, and so created greater amplification via positive feedback of the population at the better site. In short, these small colonies make use of a distributed mechanism of information processing, but also take advantage of direct decision-making by well-informed individuals. The latter feature may in part stem from the limitations of their social structure, but may also reflect the stringent demand for unanimous decisions by house-hunting colonies of any size.

AB - Social insect colonies possess remarkable abilities to select the best among several courses of action. In populous societies with highly efficient recruitment behaviour, decision-making is distributed across many individuals, each acting on limited local information with appropriate decision rules. To investigate the degree to which small societies with less efficient recruitment can also employ distributed decision-making, we studied nest site selection in Leptothorax albipennis. Colonies were found to make sophisticated choices, taking into account not only the intrinsic qualities of each site, but also its value relative to the available options. In choices between two sites, individual ants were able to visit both sites, compare them and choose the better one. However, most ants encountered only one site in the course of an emigration. These poorly informed ants also contributed to the colony's decision, because their probability of initiating recruitment to a site depended on its quality. This led to shorter latencies between discovery and recruitment to a superior site, and so created greater amplification via positive feedback of the population at the better site. In short, these small colonies make use of a distributed mechanism of information processing, but also take advantage of direct decision-making by well-informed individuals. The latter feature may in part stem from the limitations of their social structure, but may also reflect the stringent demand for unanimous decisions by house-hunting colonies of any size.

KW - Ants

KW - Communication

KW - Decentralised control

KW - Decision-making

KW - Social insects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034828414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034828414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s002650100377

DO - 10.1007/s002650100377

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034828414

VL - 50

SP - 352

EP - 359

JO - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

JF - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

SN - 0340-5443

IS - 4

ER -