Index: An informant-defined experiment in social structure

Harvey Bernard, Christopher McCarty, Peter D. Killworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes an informant-defined experiment, designed to answer the questions “whom does any informant know, and why?” Each of 50 informants was allowed to ask an unlimited number of questions about each of 50 target persons (all mythical, each with a created life history). When informants felt they had enough information, they told us which of their acquaintances was most likely to know the target person, or, more precisely, could serve as the first step in a chain of acquaintances. The data show that four basic questions (location, occupation, age, and sex) account for more than 50 percent of questions asked, and a basic collection of six or seven questions would suffice for most circumstances. Less often used questions tend to be employed only when the basic set produces no useful information for that informant. The (verbal) reasons given for a choice could be succinctly defined using no more than four concepts. Analysis of these reasons shows that the basic pattern occurs throughout: location is important when the target is near, in a big town, and has a low occupation rating; occupation is important when the reverse holds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-133
Number of pages35
JournalSocial Forces
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social structure
occupation
experiment
human being
town
rating
Informants
Experiment
Social Structure
Person
Acquaintance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Index : An informant-defined experiment in social structure. / Bernard, Harvey; McCarty, Christopher; Killworth, Peter D.

In: Social Forces, Vol. 61, No. 1, 01.01.1982, p. 99-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bernard, Harvey ; McCarty, Christopher ; Killworth, Peter D. / Index : An informant-defined experiment in social structure. In: Social Forces. 1982 ; Vol. 61, No. 1. pp. 99-133.
@article{e8aa30bee98342dcb8fa8d863449ded7,
title = "Index: An informant-defined experiment in social structure",
abstract = "This paper describes an informant-defined experiment, designed to answer the questions “whom does any informant know, and why?” Each of 50 informants was allowed to ask an unlimited number of questions about each of 50 target persons (all mythical, each with a created life history). When informants felt they had enough information, they told us which of their acquaintances was most likely to know the target person, or, more precisely, could serve as the first step in a chain of acquaintances. The data show that four basic questions (location, occupation, age, and sex) account for more than 50 percent of questions asked, and a basic collection of six or seven questions would suffice for most circumstances. Less often used questions tend to be employed only when the basic set produces no useful information for that informant. The (verbal) reasons given for a choice could be succinctly defined using no more than four concepts. Analysis of these reasons shows that the basic pattern occurs throughout: location is important when the target is near, in a big town, and has a low occupation rating; occupation is important when the reverse holds.",
author = "Harvey Bernard and Christopher McCarty and Killworth, {Peter D.}",
year = "1982",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/sf/61.1.99",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "99--133",
journal = "Social Forces",
issn = "0037-7732",
publisher = "University of North Carolina Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Index

T2 - An informant-defined experiment in social structure

AU - Bernard, Harvey

AU - McCarty, Christopher

AU - Killworth, Peter D.

PY - 1982/1/1

Y1 - 1982/1/1

N2 - This paper describes an informant-defined experiment, designed to answer the questions “whom does any informant know, and why?” Each of 50 informants was allowed to ask an unlimited number of questions about each of 50 target persons (all mythical, each with a created life history). When informants felt they had enough information, they told us which of their acquaintances was most likely to know the target person, or, more precisely, could serve as the first step in a chain of acquaintances. The data show that four basic questions (location, occupation, age, and sex) account for more than 50 percent of questions asked, and a basic collection of six or seven questions would suffice for most circumstances. Less often used questions tend to be employed only when the basic set produces no useful information for that informant. The (verbal) reasons given for a choice could be succinctly defined using no more than four concepts. Analysis of these reasons shows that the basic pattern occurs throughout: location is important when the target is near, in a big town, and has a low occupation rating; occupation is important when the reverse holds.

AB - This paper describes an informant-defined experiment, designed to answer the questions “whom does any informant know, and why?” Each of 50 informants was allowed to ask an unlimited number of questions about each of 50 target persons (all mythical, each with a created life history). When informants felt they had enough information, they told us which of their acquaintances was most likely to know the target person, or, more precisely, could serve as the first step in a chain of acquaintances. The data show that four basic questions (location, occupation, age, and sex) account for more than 50 percent of questions asked, and a basic collection of six or seven questions would suffice for most circumstances. Less often used questions tend to be employed only when the basic set produces no useful information for that informant. The (verbal) reasons given for a choice could be succinctly defined using no more than four concepts. Analysis of these reasons shows that the basic pattern occurs throughout: location is important when the target is near, in a big town, and has a low occupation rating; occupation is important when the reverse holds.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959812920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959812920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/sf/61.1.99

DO - 10.1093/sf/61.1.99

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84959812920

VL - 61

SP - 99

EP - 133

JO - Social Forces

JF - Social Forces

SN - 0037-7732

IS - 1

ER -