TY - JOUR
T1 - Index
T2 - An informant-defined experiment in social structure
AU - Russell Bernard, H.
AU - McCarty, Christopher
AU - Killworth, Peter D.
N1 - Funding Information:
*This work was supported under Office of Naval Research Contract #NOOO14-75-C-04410POOOOl, Code 452. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the supporting agency. We are deeply indebted to Bruce Mayhew for stimulating discussions about social structure.
PY - 1982/9
Y1 - 1982/9
N2 - This paper describes an informant-defined experiment, designed to answer the questions “whom does any informant know, and why?” Each of 50 informants was allowed to ask an unlimited number of questions about each of 50 target persons (all mythical, each with a created life history). When informants felt they had enough information, they told us which of their acquaintances was most likely to know the target person, or, more precisely, could serve as the first step in a chain of acquaintances. The data show that four basic questions (location, occupation, age, and sex) account for more than 50 percent of questions asked, and a basic collection of six or seven questions would suffice for most circumstances. Less often used questions tend to be employed only when the basic set produces no useful information for that informant. The (verbal) reasons given for a choice could be succinctly defined using no more than four concepts. Analysis of these reasons shows that the basic pattern occurs throughout: location is important when the target is near, in a big town, and has a low occupation rating; occupation is important when the reverse holds.
AB - This paper describes an informant-defined experiment, designed to answer the questions “whom does any informant know, and why?” Each of 50 informants was allowed to ask an unlimited number of questions about each of 50 target persons (all mythical, each with a created life history). When informants felt they had enough information, they told us which of their acquaintances was most likely to know the target person, or, more precisely, could serve as the first step in a chain of acquaintances. The data show that four basic questions (location, occupation, age, and sex) account for more than 50 percent of questions asked, and a basic collection of six or seven questions would suffice for most circumstances. Less often used questions tend to be employed only when the basic set produces no useful information for that informant. The (verbal) reasons given for a choice could be succinctly defined using no more than four concepts. Analysis of these reasons shows that the basic pattern occurs throughout: location is important when the target is near, in a big town, and has a low occupation rating; occupation is important when the reverse holds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959812920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959812920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/sf/61.1.99
DO - 10.1093/sf/61.1.99
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84959812920
SN - 0037-7732
VL - 61
SP - 99
EP - 133
JO - Social Forces
JF - Social Forces
IS - 1
ER -