Incorporating strategy instruction within the writing process in the regular classroom: Effects on the writing of students with and without learning disabilities

Barbara Danoff, Karen Harris, Stephen Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of embedding strategy instruction in the context of a process approach to writing in inclusive classrooms. Through a series of extended mini-lessons during writers’ workshop, both students with and without a learning disability were taught a previously validated writing strategy and procedures for regulating the strategy and the writing process. The strategy instructional procedures had a positive effect on the participating fourth- and fifth-grade students’ writing. The schematic structure of their stories improved substantially following instruction and remained improved over time and with a different teacher. The quality of what was written also improved for all but two of the students following instruction. Overall, improvements in story quality were maintained and generalized by all of the students, except for the younger fourth graders and one fifth-grade student who failed to maintain quality gains on a generalization probe. In addition, one of the students who had not evidenced quality gains immediately following instruction, wrote qualitatively better stories on the generalization and maintenance probes. Finally, data collected during instruction demonstrated that the best results were obtained when all stages and components of instruction were enacted. Implications for instruction and research were examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-322
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Literacy Research
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

learning disability
instruction
classroom
student
Strategy Instruction
Writing Process
Regular
Learning Disability
writer
teacher

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{68c99162e018467998527e28780b0d55,
title = "Incorporating strategy instruction within the writing process in the regular classroom: Effects on the writing of students with and without learning disabilities",
abstract = "This study examined the effectiveness of embedding strategy instruction in the context of a process approach to writing in inclusive classrooms. Through a series of extended mini-lessons during writers’ workshop, both students with and without a learning disability were taught a previously validated writing strategy and procedures for regulating the strategy and the writing process. The strategy instructional procedures had a positive effect on the participating fourth- and fifth-grade students’ writing. The schematic structure of their stories improved substantially following instruction and remained improved over time and with a different teacher. The quality of what was written also improved for all but two of the students following instruction. Overall, improvements in story quality were maintained and generalized by all of the students, except for the younger fourth graders and one fifth-grade student who failed to maintain quality gains on a generalization probe. In addition, one of the students who had not evidenced quality gains immediately following instruction, wrote qualitatively better stories on the generalization and maintenance probes. Finally, data collected during instruction demonstrated that the best results were obtained when all stages and components of instruction were enacted. Implications for instruction and research were examined.",
author = "Barbara Danoff and Karen Harris and Stephen Graham",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1080/10862969009547819",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "295--322",
journal = "Journal of Literacy Research",
issn = "1086-296X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incorporating strategy instruction within the writing process in the regular classroom

T2 - Effects on the writing of students with and without learning disabilities

AU - Danoff, Barbara

AU - Harris, Karen

AU - Graham, Stephen

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - This study examined the effectiveness of embedding strategy instruction in the context of a process approach to writing in inclusive classrooms. Through a series of extended mini-lessons during writers’ workshop, both students with and without a learning disability were taught a previously validated writing strategy and procedures for regulating the strategy and the writing process. The strategy instructional procedures had a positive effect on the participating fourth- and fifth-grade students’ writing. The schematic structure of their stories improved substantially following instruction and remained improved over time and with a different teacher. The quality of what was written also improved for all but two of the students following instruction. Overall, improvements in story quality were maintained and generalized by all of the students, except for the younger fourth graders and one fifth-grade student who failed to maintain quality gains on a generalization probe. In addition, one of the students who had not evidenced quality gains immediately following instruction, wrote qualitatively better stories on the generalization and maintenance probes. Finally, data collected during instruction demonstrated that the best results were obtained when all stages and components of instruction were enacted. Implications for instruction and research were examined.

AB - This study examined the effectiveness of embedding strategy instruction in the context of a process approach to writing in inclusive classrooms. Through a series of extended mini-lessons during writers’ workshop, both students with and without a learning disability were taught a previously validated writing strategy and procedures for regulating the strategy and the writing process. The strategy instructional procedures had a positive effect on the participating fourth- and fifth-grade students’ writing. The schematic structure of their stories improved substantially following instruction and remained improved over time and with a different teacher. The quality of what was written also improved for all but two of the students following instruction. Overall, improvements in story quality were maintained and generalized by all of the students, except for the younger fourth graders and one fifth-grade student who failed to maintain quality gains on a generalization probe. In addition, one of the students who had not evidenced quality gains immediately following instruction, wrote qualitatively better stories on the generalization and maintenance probes. Finally, data collected during instruction demonstrated that the best results were obtained when all stages and components of instruction were enacted. Implications for instruction and research were examined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965443314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965443314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10862969009547819

DO - 10.1080/10862969009547819

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84965443314

VL - 25

SP - 295

EP - 322

JO - Journal of Literacy Research

JF - Journal of Literacy Research

SN - 1086-296X

IS - 3

ER -