In with the old and out with the new? A comparison of the old and new binge drinking standards

William Corbin, Suzanne Zalewski, Robert F. Leeman, Benjamin A. Toll, Lisa M. Fucito, Stephanie S. O'Malley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is consistent evidence that the binge drinking standard of 5+ drinks per drinking occasion for men (4+ for women) is associated with risk for negative consequences. Yet, many have questioned the adequacy of this measure as an index of intoxication (e.g., a blood alcohol concentration [BAC] of 0.08 g%). In response to these concerns, a National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism task force recommended adding a time qualifier of 2 hours to this criterion. Although conceptually appealing, there has been little effort to determine whether this new measure better captures drinking that leads to negative consequences. Methods: This study examined the new binge standard (2-hour period) and old binge standard (no time qualifier) in relation to frequency of drinking to an estimated BAC of 0.08 g% and the experience of negative drinking consequences. These relations were examined within both a social drinking sample of adults (N = 200) and a sample of heavy-drinking young adults (N = 168) participating in a randomized clinical trial for drinking reduction. Results: Contrary to the purpose of adding a time qualifier, the new binge measure was not more strongly correlated with drinking to an estimated BAC of 0.08 g% relative to the old binge measure. In addition, when both measures were entered simultaneously into a regression model, only the old binge measure accounted for significant variance in negative drinking consequences. Conclusions: These empirically based results suggest that the original binge standard without a time qualifier may be preferable to the 2-hour standard as a marker for risk. The findings also suggest that further efforts are needed to identify a brief measure that effectively captures drinking to intoxication and related risk for negative consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2657-2663
Number of pages7
JournalAlcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Binge Drinking
Drinking
Alcohols
Blood
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.)
Advisory Committees
Young Adult
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • NIAAA
  • Binge Drinking
  • Consequences
  • Intoxication
  • Time Qualifier

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Toxicology

Cite this

In with the old and out with the new? A comparison of the old and new binge drinking standards. / Corbin, William; Zalewski, Suzanne; Leeman, Robert F.; Toll, Benjamin A.; Fucito, Lisa M.; O'Malley, Stephanie S.

In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Vol. 38, No. 10, 01.10.2014, p. 2657-2663.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Corbin, William ; Zalewski, Suzanne ; Leeman, Robert F. ; Toll, Benjamin A. ; Fucito, Lisa M. ; O'Malley, Stephanie S. / In with the old and out with the new? A comparison of the old and new binge drinking standards. In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2014 ; Vol. 38, No. 10. pp. 2657-2663.
@article{a1ea6c27bb2841cc8728bc83c5da29b0,
title = "In with the old and out with the new? A comparison of the old and new binge drinking standards",
abstract = "Background: There is consistent evidence that the binge drinking standard of 5+ drinks per drinking occasion for men (4+ for women) is associated with risk for negative consequences. Yet, many have questioned the adequacy of this measure as an index of intoxication (e.g., a blood alcohol concentration [BAC] of 0.08 g{\%}). In response to these concerns, a National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism task force recommended adding a time qualifier of 2 hours to this criterion. Although conceptually appealing, there has been little effort to determine whether this new measure better captures drinking that leads to negative consequences. Methods: This study examined the new binge standard (2-hour period) and old binge standard (no time qualifier) in relation to frequency of drinking to an estimated BAC of 0.08 g{\%} and the experience of negative drinking consequences. These relations were examined within both a social drinking sample of adults (N = 200) and a sample of heavy-drinking young adults (N = 168) participating in a randomized clinical trial for drinking reduction. Results: Contrary to the purpose of adding a time qualifier, the new binge measure was not more strongly correlated with drinking to an estimated BAC of 0.08 g{\%} relative to the old binge measure. In addition, when both measures were entered simultaneously into a regression model, only the old binge measure accounted for significant variance in negative drinking consequences. Conclusions: These empirically based results suggest that the original binge standard without a time qualifier may be preferable to the 2-hour standard as a marker for risk. The findings also suggest that further efforts are needed to identify a brief measure that effectively captures drinking to intoxication and related risk for negative consequences.",
keywords = "NIAAA, Binge Drinking, Consequences, Intoxication, Time Qualifier",
author = "William Corbin and Suzanne Zalewski and Leeman, {Robert F.} and Toll, {Benjamin A.} and Fucito, {Lisa M.} and O'Malley, {Stephanie S.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acer.12514",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "2657--2663",
journal = "Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research",
issn = "0145-6008",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In with the old and out with the new? A comparison of the old and new binge drinking standards

AU - Corbin, William

AU - Zalewski, Suzanne

AU - Leeman, Robert F.

AU - Toll, Benjamin A.

AU - Fucito, Lisa M.

AU - O'Malley, Stephanie S.

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Background: There is consistent evidence that the binge drinking standard of 5+ drinks per drinking occasion for men (4+ for women) is associated with risk for negative consequences. Yet, many have questioned the adequacy of this measure as an index of intoxication (e.g., a blood alcohol concentration [BAC] of 0.08 g%). In response to these concerns, a National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism task force recommended adding a time qualifier of 2 hours to this criterion. Although conceptually appealing, there has been little effort to determine whether this new measure better captures drinking that leads to negative consequences. Methods: This study examined the new binge standard (2-hour period) and old binge standard (no time qualifier) in relation to frequency of drinking to an estimated BAC of 0.08 g% and the experience of negative drinking consequences. These relations were examined within both a social drinking sample of adults (N = 200) and a sample of heavy-drinking young adults (N = 168) participating in a randomized clinical trial for drinking reduction. Results: Contrary to the purpose of adding a time qualifier, the new binge measure was not more strongly correlated with drinking to an estimated BAC of 0.08 g% relative to the old binge measure. In addition, when both measures were entered simultaneously into a regression model, only the old binge measure accounted for significant variance in negative drinking consequences. Conclusions: These empirically based results suggest that the original binge standard without a time qualifier may be preferable to the 2-hour standard as a marker for risk. The findings also suggest that further efforts are needed to identify a brief measure that effectively captures drinking to intoxication and related risk for negative consequences.

AB - Background: There is consistent evidence that the binge drinking standard of 5+ drinks per drinking occasion for men (4+ for women) is associated with risk for negative consequences. Yet, many have questioned the adequacy of this measure as an index of intoxication (e.g., a blood alcohol concentration [BAC] of 0.08 g%). In response to these concerns, a National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism task force recommended adding a time qualifier of 2 hours to this criterion. Although conceptually appealing, there has been little effort to determine whether this new measure better captures drinking that leads to negative consequences. Methods: This study examined the new binge standard (2-hour period) and old binge standard (no time qualifier) in relation to frequency of drinking to an estimated BAC of 0.08 g% and the experience of negative drinking consequences. These relations were examined within both a social drinking sample of adults (N = 200) and a sample of heavy-drinking young adults (N = 168) participating in a randomized clinical trial for drinking reduction. Results: Contrary to the purpose of adding a time qualifier, the new binge measure was not more strongly correlated with drinking to an estimated BAC of 0.08 g% relative to the old binge measure. In addition, when both measures were entered simultaneously into a regression model, only the old binge measure accounted for significant variance in negative drinking consequences. Conclusions: These empirically based results suggest that the original binge standard without a time qualifier may be preferable to the 2-hour standard as a marker for risk. The findings also suggest that further efforts are needed to identify a brief measure that effectively captures drinking to intoxication and related risk for negative consequences.

KW - NIAAA

KW - Binge Drinking

KW - Consequences

KW - Intoxication

KW - Time Qualifier

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911394105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911394105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acer.12514

DO - 10.1111/acer.12514

M3 - Article

C2 - 25346506

AN - SCOPUS:84911394105

VL - 38

SP - 2657

EP - 2663

JO - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

JF - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

SN - 0145-6008

IS - 10

ER -