In situ weathering rind erosion

Steven J. Gordon, Ronald Dorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of cosmogenic nuclide dating methods place in doubt the long-term future of weathering rinds (WRs) as a chronometric tool. Why estimate ages when radiometric control is possible? This paper presents evidence that WRs can provide invaluable clues about what particular sample would provide the most accurate cosmogenic age by avoiding "inheritance" of cosmogenic nuclides and by avoiding boulders undergoing spalling. The key to this new use requires testing the occurrence and nature of WR erosion. Back-scattered electron microscopy reveals that ignimbrite, andesite, basalt, and granitic clasts experience WR erosion in all subsurface and surface contexts thus far studied in Arizona, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington. To understand the magnitude of WR erosion, we measured WR thicknesses, all while controlling the cosmogenic and surface stability ages of clasts by chlorine-36 and rock varnish microlamination dating methods. Our data reveal that traditional methodologies of sampling cobbles remove two-thirds of the true thickness of weathering rinds, calling into question many beliefs including the notion that clay minerals are not produced during weathering-rind formation. Comparisons of optical and electron microscope measurements support concerns that measurement of WRs by color changes, while useful as a pedagogical tool, creates serious biases in underestimating the true dynamics of WRs. In the end, we found that concordance of WR and rock coating "age trends" indicates the ideal boulder for cosmogenic nuclide dating. Offsets reveal either ongoing boulder erosion, invalidating "zero erosion" model ages, or a potential problem with "inheritance" of cosmogenic nuclides.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-113
Number of pages17
JournalGeomorphology
Volume67
Issue number1-2 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2005

Fingerprint

weathering
erosion
dating method
boulder
clast
in situ
rock varnish
chlorine isotope
spalling
ignimbrite
electron microscopy
andesite
clay mineral
coating
basalt
electron
methodology
sampling
rock

Keywords

  • Geomorphology
  • Glacial
  • Organ Pipe
  • Quaternary
  • Sierra Nevada
  • Weathering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

In situ weathering rind erosion. / Gordon, Steven J.; Dorn, Ronald.

In: Geomorphology, Vol. 67, No. 1-2 SPEC. ISS., 01.04.2005, p. 97-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gordon, Steven J. ; Dorn, Ronald. / In situ weathering rind erosion. In: Geomorphology. 2005 ; Vol. 67, No. 1-2 SPEC. ISS. pp. 97-113.
@article{03cd42a61f5a473abb7b5097c68224af,
title = "In situ weathering rind erosion",
abstract = "The use of cosmogenic nuclide dating methods place in doubt the long-term future of weathering rinds (WRs) as a chronometric tool. Why estimate ages when radiometric control is possible? This paper presents evidence that WRs can provide invaluable clues about what particular sample would provide the most accurate cosmogenic age by avoiding {"}inheritance{"} of cosmogenic nuclides and by avoiding boulders undergoing spalling. The key to this new use requires testing the occurrence and nature of WR erosion. Back-scattered electron microscopy reveals that ignimbrite, andesite, basalt, and granitic clasts experience WR erosion in all subsurface and surface contexts thus far studied in Arizona, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington. To understand the magnitude of WR erosion, we measured WR thicknesses, all while controlling the cosmogenic and surface stability ages of clasts by chlorine-36 and rock varnish microlamination dating methods. Our data reveal that traditional methodologies of sampling cobbles remove two-thirds of the true thickness of weathering rinds, calling into question many beliefs including the notion that clay minerals are not produced during weathering-rind formation. Comparisons of optical and electron microscope measurements support concerns that measurement of WRs by color changes, while useful as a pedagogical tool, creates serious biases in underestimating the true dynamics of WRs. In the end, we found that concordance of WR and rock coating {"}age trends{"} indicates the ideal boulder for cosmogenic nuclide dating. Offsets reveal either ongoing boulder erosion, invalidating {"}zero erosion{"} model ages, or a potential problem with {"}inheritance{"} of cosmogenic nuclides.",
keywords = "Geomorphology, Glacial, Organ Pipe, Quaternary, Sierra Nevada, Weathering",
author = "Gordon, {Steven J.} and Ronald Dorn",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "97--113",
journal = "Geomorphology",
issn = "0169-555X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2 SPEC. ISS.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In situ weathering rind erosion

AU - Gordon, Steven J.

AU - Dorn, Ronald

PY - 2005/4/1

Y1 - 2005/4/1

N2 - The use of cosmogenic nuclide dating methods place in doubt the long-term future of weathering rinds (WRs) as a chronometric tool. Why estimate ages when radiometric control is possible? This paper presents evidence that WRs can provide invaluable clues about what particular sample would provide the most accurate cosmogenic age by avoiding "inheritance" of cosmogenic nuclides and by avoiding boulders undergoing spalling. The key to this new use requires testing the occurrence and nature of WR erosion. Back-scattered electron microscopy reveals that ignimbrite, andesite, basalt, and granitic clasts experience WR erosion in all subsurface and surface contexts thus far studied in Arizona, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington. To understand the magnitude of WR erosion, we measured WR thicknesses, all while controlling the cosmogenic and surface stability ages of clasts by chlorine-36 and rock varnish microlamination dating methods. Our data reveal that traditional methodologies of sampling cobbles remove two-thirds of the true thickness of weathering rinds, calling into question many beliefs including the notion that clay minerals are not produced during weathering-rind formation. Comparisons of optical and electron microscope measurements support concerns that measurement of WRs by color changes, while useful as a pedagogical tool, creates serious biases in underestimating the true dynamics of WRs. In the end, we found that concordance of WR and rock coating "age trends" indicates the ideal boulder for cosmogenic nuclide dating. Offsets reveal either ongoing boulder erosion, invalidating "zero erosion" model ages, or a potential problem with "inheritance" of cosmogenic nuclides.

AB - The use of cosmogenic nuclide dating methods place in doubt the long-term future of weathering rinds (WRs) as a chronometric tool. Why estimate ages when radiometric control is possible? This paper presents evidence that WRs can provide invaluable clues about what particular sample would provide the most accurate cosmogenic age by avoiding "inheritance" of cosmogenic nuclides and by avoiding boulders undergoing spalling. The key to this new use requires testing the occurrence and nature of WR erosion. Back-scattered electron microscopy reveals that ignimbrite, andesite, basalt, and granitic clasts experience WR erosion in all subsurface and surface contexts thus far studied in Arizona, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington. To understand the magnitude of WR erosion, we measured WR thicknesses, all while controlling the cosmogenic and surface stability ages of clasts by chlorine-36 and rock varnish microlamination dating methods. Our data reveal that traditional methodologies of sampling cobbles remove two-thirds of the true thickness of weathering rinds, calling into question many beliefs including the notion that clay minerals are not produced during weathering-rind formation. Comparisons of optical and electron microscope measurements support concerns that measurement of WRs by color changes, while useful as a pedagogical tool, creates serious biases in underestimating the true dynamics of WRs. In the end, we found that concordance of WR and rock coating "age trends" indicates the ideal boulder for cosmogenic nuclide dating. Offsets reveal either ongoing boulder erosion, invalidating "zero erosion" model ages, or a potential problem with "inheritance" of cosmogenic nuclides.

KW - Geomorphology

KW - Glacial

KW - Organ Pipe

KW - Quaternary

KW - Sierra Nevada

KW - Weathering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16244380807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16244380807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.011

DO - 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.06.011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:16244380807

VL - 67

SP - 97

EP - 113

JO - Geomorphology

JF - Geomorphology

SN - 0169-555X

IS - 1-2 SPEC. ISS.

ER -