In-situ measurements of MSW properties

Neven Matasovic, Rami El-Sherbiny, Edward Kavazanjian

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recovery and testing of representative, undisturbed or intact samples of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is difficult, if possible. Therefore, in-situ testing is the most reliable method for evaluation of the material properties of MSW. However, in-situ testing techniques are also subject to limitations that may significantly affect their applicability and consequently reliability of evaluated MSW parameters. Furthermore, because these measurements can only be made after the waste is in place, they are only directly applicable to analysis of existing landfills while extrapolations are required for design of new landfills. Material properties of interest to engineering community include unit weight and moisture content, shear strength, stiffness and compressibility, stress-strain behavior, hydraulic conductivity (saturated and unsaturated), and field capacity. These properties can roughly be categorized into mechanical and physical properties. Similarly, in-situ measurements may be divided into direct measurements of the behavior of MSW and indirect measurements that rely on correlations and/or back analyses to calculate properties of interest. It is generally difficult to categorize a certain in-situ test method as direct or indirect because each test method can directly measure certain properties and indirectly measures other properties. For example, wave propagation surveys are a direct measurement of wave velocity but an indirect measurement of stiffness; similarly, soundings with the Standard Penetration Test (SPT), Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and dilatometer (DMT) can be used to directly identify waste stratigraphy and indirectly to assess shear strength of MSW. Field measurements of MSW properties may also be divided into non-intrusive measurements that do not penetrate the waste mass and intrusive measurements that penetrate the waste mass. Classification of in-situ testing techniques into intrusive and non-intrusive is more distinct and will be used for categorizing in-situ test methods in the remainder of this Chapter. Over the past years, significant improvements in field measurements became possible. These include rapid and inexpensive measurement of ambient vibrations (e.g., REMI), accurate measurement of small deformations with laser beams (e.g., LiDAR), and include abundance of relatively accurate digital terrain measurements generated by regulatory-mandated annual flyovers over landfills. This is in addition to more in-situ test methods being adopted from geotechnical engineering for testing and sounding at landfills, such as SPT and CPT sounding, and testing with devices such as dilatometer and (self boring) pressuremeter. This Chapter aims to provide a critical review of the state-of-the practice of these methods as applied to waste mechanics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeotechnical Special Publication
Pages153-194
Number of pages42
Edition209 GSP
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Event2008 International Symposium on Waste Mechanics - Geotechnical Characterization, Field Measurement, and Laboratory Testing of Municipal Solid Waste - New Orleans, LA, United States
Duration: Mar 13 2008Mar 13 2008

Other

Other2008 International Symposium on Waste Mechanics - Geotechnical Characterization, Field Measurement, and Laboratory Testing of Municipal Solid Waste
CountryUnited States
CityNew Orleans, LA
Period3/13/083/13/08

Fingerprint

Municipal solid waste
municipal solid waste
in situ measurement
in situ test
landfill
cone penetration test
penetration test
Land fill
shear strength
stiffness
Testing
pressuremeter
field capacity
Dilatometers
geotechnical engineering
boring
compressibility
wave propagation
mechanics
wave velocity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Matasovic, N., El-Sherbiny, R., & Kavazanjian, E. (2008). In-situ measurements of MSW properties. In Geotechnical Special Publication (209 GSP ed., pp. 153-194) https://doi.org/10.1061/41146(395)6

In-situ measurements of MSW properties. / Matasovic, Neven; El-Sherbiny, Rami; Kavazanjian, Edward.

Geotechnical Special Publication. 209 GSP. ed. 2008. p. 153-194.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Matasovic, N, El-Sherbiny, R & Kavazanjian, E 2008, In-situ measurements of MSW properties. in Geotechnical Special Publication. 209 GSP edn, pp. 153-194, 2008 International Symposium on Waste Mechanics - Geotechnical Characterization, Field Measurement, and Laboratory Testing of Municipal Solid Waste, New Orleans, LA, United States, 3/13/08. https://doi.org/10.1061/41146(395)6
Matasovic N, El-Sherbiny R, Kavazanjian E. In-situ measurements of MSW properties. In Geotechnical Special Publication. 209 GSP ed. 2008. p. 153-194 https://doi.org/10.1061/41146(395)6
Matasovic, Neven ; El-Sherbiny, Rami ; Kavazanjian, Edward. / In-situ measurements of MSW properties. Geotechnical Special Publication. 209 GSP. ed. 2008. pp. 153-194
@inproceedings{7fbb44fff5274cfaace092a0febb2ef5,
title = "In-situ measurements of MSW properties",
abstract = "Recovery and testing of representative, undisturbed or intact samples of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is difficult, if possible. Therefore, in-situ testing is the most reliable method for evaluation of the material properties of MSW. However, in-situ testing techniques are also subject to limitations that may significantly affect their applicability and consequently reliability of evaluated MSW parameters. Furthermore, because these measurements can only be made after the waste is in place, they are only directly applicable to analysis of existing landfills while extrapolations are required for design of new landfills. Material properties of interest to engineering community include unit weight and moisture content, shear strength, stiffness and compressibility, stress-strain behavior, hydraulic conductivity (saturated and unsaturated), and field capacity. These properties can roughly be categorized into mechanical and physical properties. Similarly, in-situ measurements may be divided into direct measurements of the behavior of MSW and indirect measurements that rely on correlations and/or back analyses to calculate properties of interest. It is generally difficult to categorize a certain in-situ test method as direct or indirect because each test method can directly measure certain properties and indirectly measures other properties. For example, wave propagation surveys are a direct measurement of wave velocity but an indirect measurement of stiffness; similarly, soundings with the Standard Penetration Test (SPT), Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and dilatometer (DMT) can be used to directly identify waste stratigraphy and indirectly to assess shear strength of MSW. Field measurements of MSW properties may also be divided into non-intrusive measurements that do not penetrate the waste mass and intrusive measurements that penetrate the waste mass. Classification of in-situ testing techniques into intrusive and non-intrusive is more distinct and will be used for categorizing in-situ test methods in the remainder of this Chapter. Over the past years, significant improvements in field measurements became possible. These include rapid and inexpensive measurement of ambient vibrations (e.g., REMI), accurate measurement of small deformations with laser beams (e.g., LiDAR), and include abundance of relatively accurate digital terrain measurements generated by regulatory-mandated annual flyovers over landfills. This is in addition to more in-situ test methods being adopted from geotechnical engineering for testing and sounding at landfills, such as SPT and CPT sounding, and testing with devices such as dilatometer and (self boring) pressuremeter. This Chapter aims to provide a critical review of the state-of-the practice of these methods as applied to waste mechanics.",
author = "Neven Matasovic and Rami El-Sherbiny and Edward Kavazanjian",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1061/41146(395)6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784411469",
pages = "153--194",
booktitle = "Geotechnical Special Publication",
edition = "209 GSP",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - In-situ measurements of MSW properties

AU - Matasovic, Neven

AU - El-Sherbiny, Rami

AU - Kavazanjian, Edward

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Recovery and testing of representative, undisturbed or intact samples of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is difficult, if possible. Therefore, in-situ testing is the most reliable method for evaluation of the material properties of MSW. However, in-situ testing techniques are also subject to limitations that may significantly affect their applicability and consequently reliability of evaluated MSW parameters. Furthermore, because these measurements can only be made after the waste is in place, they are only directly applicable to analysis of existing landfills while extrapolations are required for design of new landfills. Material properties of interest to engineering community include unit weight and moisture content, shear strength, stiffness and compressibility, stress-strain behavior, hydraulic conductivity (saturated and unsaturated), and field capacity. These properties can roughly be categorized into mechanical and physical properties. Similarly, in-situ measurements may be divided into direct measurements of the behavior of MSW and indirect measurements that rely on correlations and/or back analyses to calculate properties of interest. It is generally difficult to categorize a certain in-situ test method as direct or indirect because each test method can directly measure certain properties and indirectly measures other properties. For example, wave propagation surveys are a direct measurement of wave velocity but an indirect measurement of stiffness; similarly, soundings with the Standard Penetration Test (SPT), Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and dilatometer (DMT) can be used to directly identify waste stratigraphy and indirectly to assess shear strength of MSW. Field measurements of MSW properties may also be divided into non-intrusive measurements that do not penetrate the waste mass and intrusive measurements that penetrate the waste mass. Classification of in-situ testing techniques into intrusive and non-intrusive is more distinct and will be used for categorizing in-situ test methods in the remainder of this Chapter. Over the past years, significant improvements in field measurements became possible. These include rapid and inexpensive measurement of ambient vibrations (e.g., REMI), accurate measurement of small deformations with laser beams (e.g., LiDAR), and include abundance of relatively accurate digital terrain measurements generated by regulatory-mandated annual flyovers over landfills. This is in addition to more in-situ test methods being adopted from geotechnical engineering for testing and sounding at landfills, such as SPT and CPT sounding, and testing with devices such as dilatometer and (self boring) pressuremeter. This Chapter aims to provide a critical review of the state-of-the practice of these methods as applied to waste mechanics.

AB - Recovery and testing of representative, undisturbed or intact samples of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is difficult, if possible. Therefore, in-situ testing is the most reliable method for evaluation of the material properties of MSW. However, in-situ testing techniques are also subject to limitations that may significantly affect their applicability and consequently reliability of evaluated MSW parameters. Furthermore, because these measurements can only be made after the waste is in place, they are only directly applicable to analysis of existing landfills while extrapolations are required for design of new landfills. Material properties of interest to engineering community include unit weight and moisture content, shear strength, stiffness and compressibility, stress-strain behavior, hydraulic conductivity (saturated and unsaturated), and field capacity. These properties can roughly be categorized into mechanical and physical properties. Similarly, in-situ measurements may be divided into direct measurements of the behavior of MSW and indirect measurements that rely on correlations and/or back analyses to calculate properties of interest. It is generally difficult to categorize a certain in-situ test method as direct or indirect because each test method can directly measure certain properties and indirectly measures other properties. For example, wave propagation surveys are a direct measurement of wave velocity but an indirect measurement of stiffness; similarly, soundings with the Standard Penetration Test (SPT), Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and dilatometer (DMT) can be used to directly identify waste stratigraphy and indirectly to assess shear strength of MSW. Field measurements of MSW properties may also be divided into non-intrusive measurements that do not penetrate the waste mass and intrusive measurements that penetrate the waste mass. Classification of in-situ testing techniques into intrusive and non-intrusive is more distinct and will be used for categorizing in-situ test methods in the remainder of this Chapter. Over the past years, significant improvements in field measurements became possible. These include rapid and inexpensive measurement of ambient vibrations (e.g., REMI), accurate measurement of small deformations with laser beams (e.g., LiDAR), and include abundance of relatively accurate digital terrain measurements generated by regulatory-mandated annual flyovers over landfills. This is in addition to more in-situ test methods being adopted from geotechnical engineering for testing and sounding at landfills, such as SPT and CPT sounding, and testing with devices such as dilatometer and (self boring) pressuremeter. This Chapter aims to provide a critical review of the state-of-the practice of these methods as applied to waste mechanics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953001798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953001798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/41146(395)6

DO - 10.1061/41146(395)6

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780784411469

SP - 153

EP - 194

BT - Geotechnical Special Publication

ER -