In praise of touch

Mario Equicola and the nature of love

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article discusses the praise of touch as the most important of the senses in Mario Equicola's De natura d'amore (1525) and, more broadly, addresses the moral and physiological status of touch in debates about the nature of love in the sixteenth century. Although Equicola's cautious and idiosyncratic defense of touch had relatively little impact on sixteenth-century debates about either the status of sexuality or the material nature of human existence, it is nonetheless an important acknowledgment of the centrality of sexuality to human life. It sheds light on early modern ways of understanding the physical world and the relation between sexuality and love. And it demonstrates that Platonic orthodoxy on the subject was not universally accepted, even in the scholarly community.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-130
Number of pages12
JournalSenses and Society
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

love
sexuality
sixteenth century
community

Keywords

  • Equicola
  • Love
  • Plato
  • Sexuality
  • Touch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

In praise of touch : Mario Equicola and the nature of love. / Moulton, Ian.

In: Senses and Society, Vol. 5, No. 1, 03.2010, p. 119-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{314dd6d7d96147f4a5ea23b90938232a,
title = "In praise of touch: Mario Equicola and the nature of love",
abstract = "This article discusses the praise of touch as the most important of the senses in Mario Equicola's De natura d'amore (1525) and, more broadly, addresses the moral and physiological status of touch in debates about the nature of love in the sixteenth century. Although Equicola's cautious and idiosyncratic defense of touch had relatively little impact on sixteenth-century debates about either the status of sexuality or the material nature of human existence, it is nonetheless an important acknowledgment of the centrality of sexuality to human life. It sheds light on early modern ways of understanding the physical world and the relation between sexuality and love. And it demonstrates that Platonic orthodoxy on the subject was not universally accepted, even in the scholarly community.",
keywords = "Equicola, Love, Plato, Sexuality, Touch",
author = "Ian Moulton",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2752/174589310X12549020528338",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "119--130",
journal = "Senses and Society",
issn = "1745-8927",
publisher = "Berg Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In praise of touch

T2 - Mario Equicola and the nature of love

AU - Moulton, Ian

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - This article discusses the praise of touch as the most important of the senses in Mario Equicola's De natura d'amore (1525) and, more broadly, addresses the moral and physiological status of touch in debates about the nature of love in the sixteenth century. Although Equicola's cautious and idiosyncratic defense of touch had relatively little impact on sixteenth-century debates about either the status of sexuality or the material nature of human existence, it is nonetheless an important acknowledgment of the centrality of sexuality to human life. It sheds light on early modern ways of understanding the physical world and the relation between sexuality and love. And it demonstrates that Platonic orthodoxy on the subject was not universally accepted, even in the scholarly community.

AB - This article discusses the praise of touch as the most important of the senses in Mario Equicola's De natura d'amore (1525) and, more broadly, addresses the moral and physiological status of touch in debates about the nature of love in the sixteenth century. Although Equicola's cautious and idiosyncratic defense of touch had relatively little impact on sixteenth-century debates about either the status of sexuality or the material nature of human existence, it is nonetheless an important acknowledgment of the centrality of sexuality to human life. It sheds light on early modern ways of understanding the physical world and the relation between sexuality and love. And it demonstrates that Platonic orthodoxy on the subject was not universally accepted, even in the scholarly community.

KW - Equicola

KW - Love

KW - Plato

KW - Sexuality

KW - Touch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77049106098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77049106098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2752/174589310X12549020528338

DO - 10.2752/174589310X12549020528338

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 119

EP - 130

JO - Senses and Society

JF - Senses and Society

SN - 1745-8927

IS - 1

ER -